Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Sierra Valley Railroad Remodel

1649 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: California
  • 36 posts
Posted by innocent_gentleman on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:36 AM
Well I am putting the layout in my parents house and as such get over ruled a lot.  Thankfully  my wife cares not for what I do with the trains but my lil' girl loves them both big and small. 
aav
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Cincinnati,OH
  • 88 posts
Posted by aav on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:11 PM
 innocent_gentleman wrote:

Thanks for the comments.  I will pass them up the line and see what "they" think so I can see if I can get it to a more realistic operation as I am only a peon in this endeavor and have to bend a lot to the family's wishes.

 

Don

             Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]       I'm thinking i should be glad that my wife and son want nothing to do with the trains.

aav
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: California
  • 36 posts
Posted by innocent_gentleman on Monday, January 21, 2008 7:04 PM

Thanks for the comments.  I will pass them up the line and see what "they" think so I can see if I can get it to a more realistic operation as I am only a peon in this endeavor and have to bend a lot to the family's wishes.

 

Don

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Monday, January 21, 2008 12:31 PM

Hi,

I have two impressions. The first is that the track uses the space. The second is that the track uses the space without much regard for function. What I mean by that is that if you are going to build a plywood layout and put a few hills tunnels and trees, it will work fine for the kids. But as soon as you put buildings, you'll run into issues of not being able to make it look realistic.

This may or may not be a problem if you are just building a layout for your kids. But if you are trying for a realistic looking model railroad, you have to plan for buildings, access roads, parking etc. which will be difficult with your design.   

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Saskatchewan
  • 2,201 posts
Posted by last mountain & eastern hogger on Monday, January 21, 2008 11:25 AM

Whistling [:-^]

Nice to meet an innocent Gentleman, 

This is just my My 2 cents [2c]worth, I think it is a great plan. If it were mine I would look at a double crossover somewhere on the long wall so that you could change directions both ways.  I've worked hard on my layout to get a reverse loop in so that I can run head first back into staging or interchange yards.

It is worth the effort and I think you'll be pleased with the result.Smile [:)]

Johnboy out..............

James:1 Verse:5 

from Saskatchewan, in the Great White North.. 

We have met the enemy,  and he is us............ (Pogo)

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: California
  • 36 posts
Sierra Valley Railroad Remodel
Posted by innocent_gentleman on Monday, January 21, 2008 2:09 AM

Please comment on my "families" HO scale fictional railroad in the 1980's.  The old DC three layered layout is being torn down for the addition of a Corvette in the garage. 

New scheme will be SF and SP plus a shortline fictional Sierra Valley RR.  Locomotives primarily SD40T-2, SD40, SD45, SD9E, GP38-2, GP9E, GP7.  Rolling stock no longer than 72' hoppers or bulkhead flats. 

Lumber milling on the south with industrial area on the north.  North east area (tip of upside down "J") has three stall engine house with two siding next to it.  Double main is a must per step-dad for the grandkids to watch trains go around in different directions.  Center line between the double mains for switching and freight movement.  All turnouts Atlas #6.  Minimum 19.5 degree radius.  New layout will be DCC.

Layout "border" is fixed except for the small area in the north east tip of the upside down "J".  That may be extended an additional three feet.  The west side tracks may snake and climb 2.5% grade to 3" and back down again for "scenic separation". 

Any comments would be appreciated from those that like to tinker with these things.

Don

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!