Chip
Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.
Dave
Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow
Dan M wrote: Must have been distracted by my Daytona Breach and Bikini Central plan I was working on!
Must have been distracted by my Daytona Breach and Bikini Central plan I was working on!
Please feel free to post a copy of that plan...
I have figured out what is wrong with my brain! On the left side nothing works right, and on the right side there is nothing left!
Since I just noticed that the one I submitted is my 12 x 12, remove it since I did not make the adjustments to the room size. I had just designed that basic layout for a co-worker to fit a 12x 12 area and forgot about the 12 x 10 or 10 x 12 room size. As the creator of the track plan, scap the submission and let the best one win, with in the guidlines of the rules supplied.
There, no more dilemmam to ponder.
Sfdsmokeeater
Oh Yeah, I thought I designed it for HO Scale.
exPalaceDog wrote: vsmith wrote:how about an Unlimited Class competition!Great ideal! ...would love to see a competition based on "If I won the lottery"
vsmith wrote:how about an Unlimited Class competition!
exPalaceDog wrote: The Old Dog's manifesto on layout design<snip>
The Old Dog's manifesto on layout design
<snip>
xPD:
"I bring you these nineteen..." *smash and a half* "....Oy. These ten commandments."
Folks: I'm going to have to agree with whoever stated the S & PF looks like HO scale, at least partly. The tracks appear to be on 2" centers, and the 24" radius is really broad for N. Maybe it's TT.
exPalaceDog wrote: For example, the Old Hound would reccommend that no turnout be further then say 30" from an aisle or access openning. Many of the submissions appear to have major access problems that would probably result in their early demise.Have fun
For example, the Old Hound would reccommend that no turnout be further then say 30" from an aisle or access openning. Many of the submissions appear to have major access problems that would probably result in their early demise.
Have fun
Yep, I noticed that too, some had big reach issues, need 5' long arms on a couple...
Have fun with your trains
Texas Zepher wrote: vsmith wrote:I got a schematic 40'x40' retairement layout sketched out somewhere...Doesn't everyone? Mine is AT&SF Raton Pass from Trinidad to Raton. I did it in 1970 for my "final" in 7th grade drafting class.
vsmith wrote:I got a schematic 40'x40' retairement layout sketched out somewhere...
Los Angeles, 1940, ATSF, UP, SP, LARR and PE RRs, Downtown, Harbor, San Bernardino, Fullerton, Pasadena, even Santa Barbara are all included to one degree or another
First, to get back to the original question, if a submission violates the "rules", the Old Dog would suggest adding a text box next to the submission, quoting the "rule" that was violated. The voters then should be free to access what penality they feel is appropriate while voting.
Second, for the next contest, the Old Mutt would suggest that all the "rules" be placed in one post. Perhaps the "rules" could be passed by several reviewers by e-mail before posting to try to eliminate any ambiguities or confusion.
Third, one item that should be included in the rules are some standard for access to allow for construction, maintenance, and operation. For example, the Old Hound would reccommend that no turnout be further then say 30" from an aisle or access openning. Many of the submissions appear to have major access problems that would probably result in their early demise.
Folks:
Somebody up there ^ mentioned a shelf layout for the next contest. That would be cool. I think it would be best to start with a table size for one of those...maybe 24" x 96".
I really like the "pick a theme" feature that is being used in the current competition.
If we were to do a "shoot the moon" contest at some time, I think we'd need a lot more time for the design-submission stage. I'm not sure if I'd submit an entry; my designs tend to be small or medium-sized. I probably would.
concretelackey wrote: My thoughts....just call this current contest "the best in show". Since the stated room size/door location/door functionability guidelines were overlooked I'd say we vote for the best overall entry AS IS. Any future competions can be clearly outlined as far as the room requirements and each entrant would need to ask themselves if they met each one.As far as PV's suggestions on a theme based contest, if you were to state a set dollar minimum/maximum then all entrants should be required to submit prices for the items they used. This could become an accounting nightmare.
My thoughts....just call this current contest "the best in show". Since the stated room size/door location/door functionability guidelines were overlooked I'd say we vote for the best overall entry AS IS. Any future competions can be clearly outlined as far as the room requirements and each entrant would need to ask themselves if they met each one.
As far as PV's suggestions on a theme based contest, if you were to state a set dollar minimum/maximum then all entrants should be required to submit prices for the items they used. This could become an accounting nightmare.
I would LOVE a contest based on $ investment! With my semi-vast stock of stuff bought with 1960s dollars, my preference for (CHEAP!!!) hand-laid specialwork, my use of DC rather than DCC (most of my locomotives originally cost less than the decoders I'd need to convert them to DCC!) and other cheap frugal building practices, I could fill a garage or small barn for what most of my competitors would need for the present 10x12 designs. (Does that make you think it's a not-so-smart idea? I do, even with my hypothetical advantage.)
Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)
Is there money involved? Otherwise, I'd say forget about it.
As I view the various entrants there are several designs that look good on paper, but don't make sense in reality. One N-scale layout in particular appears to have 6-inch wide walkways around two of it's perimeters, which also just happen to hold staging yards. I don't know about you, but if I tried to fit through that spot I'd shortly need the services of the Jaws-of-Life. (And in the interest of full disclosure, I do have an an entry in that category.)
Hopefully our judges are smart enough to spot these discrepancies and take them in account when they vote. However as an aid, perhaps you could post a banner on the page of any layout that is not in strict compliance with the rules, indicating how exactly the designer deviated from the rules.
The contest could be recurring:
One time with a size limit. One time with a dollar limit. One time with a portability limit.
Then, occasionally have a themed contest. Passenger. Traction. Mining. Logging. High speed.
... and every once in a while the If cost was no object and my favorite uncle died and left me a warehouse .......
How about best layout designed by a person younger than 16.
How about best layout designed FOR a person younger than 10.
vsmith wrote: Ha ha! Thats a good idea!, I was going to suggest a Microlayout competition but instead, how about an Unlimited Class competition! No holds barred! I got a schematic 40'x40' retairement layout sketched out somewhere...
Ha ha! Thats a good idea!, I was going to suggest a Microlayout competition but instead, how about an Unlimited Class competition! No holds barred! I got a schematic 40'x40' retairement layout sketched out somewhere...
Great ideal!
The Old Dog would love to see a competition based on "If I won the lottery"
I guess I should adopt this symbol from now on
selector wrote: It is only a dilemma in your head, Mouse. It is as clear as a ringing bell to me.
It is only a dilemma in your head, Mouse. It is as clear as a ringing bell to me.
By definition, a dilemma is a forced choice between two or more mutually exclusive options where the implementation of either will create a detriment/harm.
I don't see this as a forced choice, one could argue that there could be harm either way, as well as argue that the two are mutually exclusive. It all comes down to the rules. Were they only guidelines after all, in which case greater variation should have been evident in the various entries. But, there is not that range, and precisely because it was not meant to give them so much leeway....the rules were there to force every contestant into a sandardized format so that a comparison of the results could be carried out evenly and fairly.
You can't fairly alter the rules to suit an entry, or entries, that have not complied with the confines that the majority agreed to abide by when they generated their own plans. How can you judge any of the entries on its own merits when the entire process has been reduced to one of complete arbitrariness?
And on a strictly utilitarian basis in ethics, will you generate enough goodwill thereby to encourage participation in any further contests unless you leave them rule-free from now on? Once bitten, twice shy...so to speak.
SpaceMouse wrote: A lot of the responsibility is mine as well. If I had not been so far behind, I wouldn't have let the layouts slide by. As it was, I was in so much of a hurry, I just wanted to get it done before another titmouse appeared.
A lot of the responsibility is mine as well. If I had not been so far behind, I wouldn't have let the layouts slide by. As it was, I was in so much of a hurry, I just wanted to get it done before another titmouse appeared.
Did someone say Titmouse?
Afterthought:
How about another contest with a 12x12 room size. After all, you already have one entry.
The only fair thing to EVERYONE is to disqualify any plan that does not meet the rules.
Otherwise there is no point in making rules.
I'm sure the compliant entries would have been better or at least different if they had used that extra space.
Picture a football team being allowed to keep a victory even though they played 12 men because, after all, they did score the most points............
Leave em be. There was a great deal of ballast weighting these plans, labor put in and the contest should stand.
Let us weigh the plans based on thier offerings and leave off the battleship size and weight. Some are heavier, others fatter and a couple have glass jaws.
Chip - since this was just for some 'serious' fun, I would agree with your thoughts here: one tally for overall regardless and one for just those that complied with room specs,etc. There are lots of good ideas in the entire collection of entries no matter if the author followed the 'rules' or not.
Charles
Rules are rules. Without them, it's not much of a contest. Since you are also a contestant and would feel uncomfortable if you won, I would turn the decision over to a well respected person or, even better, panel of forum members and let them make the decision. Their decision would be final.