Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

pre-made track feeders

2607 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Delmar, NY
  • 671 posts
pre-made track feeders
Posted by DeadheadGreg on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:55 AM

Hey, i was just wondering if anyone uses an idea that I thought of the other day.  I was looking at the Atlas track feeder rail joiners, and how big and ugly they are, and I got an idea:  Why not take a railjoiner and pre-solder feeder wires to it?  That way they are already made, and you could make them look as inconspicuous as possible. 

I was thinking of soldering a wire to one side of a railjoiner, so that the wire was parallel with it, and then could be just bent straight downward to form a right angle with the rail joiner. 

is this a good idea?

PHISH REUNION MARCH 6, 7, 8 2009 HAMPTON COLISEUM IN HAMPTON, VA AND I HAVE TICKETS!!!!!! YAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!! [quote user="jkroft"]As long as my ballast is DCC compatible I'm happy![/quote] Tryin' to make a woman that you move.... and I'm sharing in the Weekapaug Groove Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world....
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:30 AM
Ummm...I may be missing something here. Atlas makes railjoiners with wires already soldered to them, both code 83 and code 100. Is that what you're referring to in "track feeder rail joiners"?? They're just regular Atlas railjoiners with wires soldered to them, so shouldn't look any worse than any other railjoiners??
Stix
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: NC, USA
  • 113 posts
Posted by Modeloldtimer on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:31 AM
If the rail joiners loosen up, you'll have a problem with loose rail feeder connections.

Modeloldtimer

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:54 AM
For a permanent layout I prefer to solder the feeders to the side of the rail.  Once the rail is painted and weathered they are quite inconspicuous.  I am not real fond of relying on a press fit rail joiner for electrical continuity.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Delmar, NY
  • 671 posts
Posted by DeadheadGreg on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:00 PM
I was thinking of doing this so that I could maybe save a step when soldering rail together on curves, or do you think it would just be easier to connect the rails with the rail joiners, and then hold a feeder wire in place and solder them together as one unit?
PHISH REUNION MARCH 6, 7, 8 2009 HAMPTON COLISEUM IN HAMPTON, VA AND I HAVE TICKETS!!!!!! YAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!! [quote user="jkroft"]As long as my ballast is DCC compatible I'm happy![/quote] Tryin' to make a woman that you move.... and I'm sharing in the Weekapaug Groove Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world....
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:09 PM

 DeadheadGreg wrote:
I was thinking of doing this so that I could maybe save a step when soldering rail together on curves, or do you think it would just be easier to connect the rails with the rail joiners, and then hold a feeder wire in place and solder them together as one unit?

Yes. That's the way to do it. When you solder your joint, the wire would have a tendency to come off. Easier just to do it all at the same time. 20/22 gauge wire is good to use for feeders.
Make sure to solder your wires to OUTSIDE of the rail so they don't interfere with your wheel flanges. Cut away a couple of plastic ties on each side of the joint so they don't melt. These can be glued back in place later. Use a higher wattage iron so you can do the joint quickly. (45 watts or so)

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:25 PM
 loathar wrote:
Cut away a couple of plastic ties on each side of the joint so they don't melt.
EEe Gads, Don't cut away plastic ties.  If one is melting the plastic ties they aren't soldering properly - probably too small of an iron.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Delmar, NY
  • 671 posts
Posted by DeadheadGreg on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 12:46 PM

Well im going to remove a few ties on the end of the rail anyways, so I dont think that will be an issue.

is there any really cheap soldering iron that you all recommend?

PHISH REUNION MARCH 6, 7, 8 2009 HAMPTON COLISEUM IN HAMPTON, VA AND I HAVE TICKETS!!!!!! YAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!! [quote user="jkroft"]As long as my ballast is DCC compatible I'm happy![/quote] Tryin' to make a woman that you move.... and I'm sharing in the Weekapaug Groove Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world....
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 1,089 posts
Posted by BlueHillsCPR on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 1:08 PM
 DeadheadGreg wrote:

Well im going to remove a few ties on the end of the rail anyways, so I dont think that will be an issue.

is there any really cheap soldering iron that you all recommend?

I would say that with the proper soldering iron, a heat sink, (MLR makes one specifically for soldering rails) and good technique no ties will melt.

I would not recommend a cheap soldering iron.  Get a weller. Smile [:)]

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:20 PM

I make up batches of these things.  Sometimes I end up soldering the track, too, sometimes not.

I do half with red wire and half with black so they're easier to connect to the proper bus beneath the layout.

I use wire that's a bit heavier than Atlas uses.

I mount the wire perpendicular to the rail joiner, at the midpoint.  That way it doesn't form a ridge which would interfere with slipping ties underneath after installing flex track.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 1,089 posts
Posted by BlueHillsCPR on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:19 PM
I was thinking.  Since our track is fastened in place and we intend to solder the rail joints anyway...why even use rail joiners?  Why not use a piece of 22-26 ga. copper wire laid along the base of each rail prior to soldering the joint instead of a bulky joiner?  For that matter would we even need the little bit of copper wire at most joints or could we simply let the solder flow along the two pieces of rail to span the joint?  I could be done as easily as when soldering feeders only use bare copper and nip off the excess.  Once the track was weathered and ballasted I doubt you would be able to see anything.  Just thinking out loud.  Any reasons why this would not work?
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Delmar, NY
  • 671 posts
Posted by DeadheadGreg on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:50 PM
people already do this.  i believe it is called "butt soldering" or something like that
PHISH REUNION MARCH 6, 7, 8 2009 HAMPTON COLISEUM IN HAMPTON, VA AND I HAVE TICKETS!!!!!! YAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!! [quote user="jkroft"]As long as my ballast is DCC compatible I'm happy![/quote] Tryin' to make a woman that you move.... and I'm sharing in the Weekapaug Groove Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world....
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 105 posts
Posted by JulesB on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 5:00 PM

 BlueHillsCPR wrote:
I was thinking.  Since our track is fastened in place and we intend to solder the rail joints anyway...why even use rail joiners?  Why not use a piece of 22-26 ga. copper wire laid along the base of each rail prior to soldering the joint instead of a bulky joiner?  For that matter would we even need the little bit of copper wire at most joints or could we simply let the solder flow along the two pieces of rail to span the joint?  I could be done as easily as when soldering feeders only use bare copper and nip off the excess.  Once the track was weathered and ballasted I doubt you would be able to see anything.  Just thinking out loud.  Any reasons why this would not work?

 

Soldering feeders to rail joiners does not amount to good electrical contact.

If you use 3' sections solder a #20 AWG feeder to the center of each section. I solder it cross ways so the feeder sticks out to the sides. After laying the section down, drill a small hole on each side down thru the base to connect to the bus. I use a utilitie knife and cut a smal channel for the feeder to the hole. After ballasting you don't see it.

For reasons of expansion/contraction, I only solder joinres on curves, staggard, to prevent kinks. Some times I may, for adding a turnout etc., cut a piece of the section, to make room for the turnout. Then I may add the piece I cut out to the other side. I will perhaps solder it to the turnouts with a bridge wire to the stock rails. In other words you want a feeder for each piece of track between un-soldered rail joiners. That way your not depending on joiners for electrical integrity. Joiners are notorious for building up resistance over time. I pre-solder 12+ 3' sections with feeders at a time. It makes it so much easyier than soldering feeders after the rail is down. 

Jules

 

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:31 PM

 Texas Zepher wrote:
 loathar wrote:
Cut away a couple of plastic ties on each side of the joint so they don't melt.
EEe Gads, Don't cut away plastic ties.  If one is melting the plastic ties they aren't soldering properly - probably too small of an iron.

Confused [%-)]Confused [%-)]Confused [%-)] Your gonna cut them on flex track anyhow. When you bend your soldered flex track around a curve, the ties are going to catch on your soldered joiners.
(and yes, I DO know how to properly solder)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:57 PM

I use Kato Unitrack and cheat a little bit by buying thier 9 inch feeder section and marking the blue side rail and the white side rail depending on which wire goes to which rail.

I cannot offer you much help on atlas, I used to get the humming 1000 gigavolt weller with it's bright lights and big solder and melt ties to get it on the rail. I finally got the fumes somewhere in my brain a little too long lol.

I miss the reassuring growl it made as it pulled on the utility company, spinning down some of the lights and other big appliances.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:29 PM

I do it a bit differently from the others, it seems.  I do run the bared, bent, tip of copper feeder inside the rails, and make it lie tight against the corner between the rail web and the foot.  I only do it this way to hide the feeder behind the rail closest to the operator.  For the far of the paired rails, I solder the feeder to their outsides, also hidden thereby. 

If/once a joiner gets to be giving me problems, I solder it.  That fixes 'em.  

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: East Granby, CT, USA
  • 505 posts
Posted by jim22 on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:58 PM

I solder my feeders to the under side of the rails, bent at a 90 degree angle so the feeders descend through the benchwork straight down underneath the rail.  After ballasting, they are invisible.  I solder track joiners between rail sections that share a feeder.  My soldering iron is a 24 watt temperature controlled Ungar.  For (HO) trackwork, I bump the temperature up a bit.  I have yet to melt any Atlas ties unless I accidently touch the iron directly to the tie.

Jim 

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 7:09 AM

 BlueHillsCPR wrote:
I was thinking.  Since our track is fastened in place and we intend to solder the rail joints anyway...why even use rail joiners?  Why not use a piece of 22-26 ga. copper wire laid along the base of each rail prior to soldering the joint instead of a bulky joiner?  For that matter would we even need the little bit of copper wire at most joints or could we simply let the solder flow along the two pieces of rail to span the joint?  I could be done as easily as when soldering feeders only use bare copper and nip off the excess.  Once the track was weathered and ballasted I doubt you would be able to see anything.  Just thinking out loud.  Any reasons why this would not work?

Pick up your roll of solder.  Pull out a small section.  Bend it back and forth a couple of times.

Now why would you expect that to be strong enough to be the mechanical connection of your rails.  Solder is just for electrical continuity.  It should be applied after you have a good mechanical connection.

Soldering is not the same as welding.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:26 AM

 wjstix wrote:
Ummm...I may be missing something here. Atlas makes railjoiners with wires already soldered to them, both code 83 and code 100. Is that what you're referring to in "track feeder rail joiners"?? They're just regular Atlas railjoiners with wires soldered to them, so shouldn't look any worse than any other railjoiners??

The Atlas joiners have a little lip of metal for the wire, so in a sense they are not just a rail joiner with a wire soldered to them  It is a delicate joint and several of mine have broken, so they almost need strengthening with some solder anyway.  I might add however that a little work with a Floquil/Testors weathering stick of rail brown makes the joiner and bit of wire inconspicuous once installed, so there are ways to address the appearance. 

The idea of wiring a lead to a rail joiner is, agreed, NOT the best for electrical conductivity but the pre-wired joiner let me add an additional feeder in some otherwise fairly inaccessible areas where I did not want to be messing with my soldering iron or gun on-site.  They have their uses.

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 1,089 posts
Posted by BlueHillsCPR on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:50 AM

 Phoebe Vet wrote:
Pick up your roll of solder.  Pull out a small section.  Bend it back and forth a couple of times.

Now why would you expect that to be strong enough to be the mechanical connection of your rails.  Solder is just for electrical continuity.  It should be applied after you have a good mechanical connection.

Soldering is not the same as welding.

Ok.  No need to be condescending in your reply. Blush [:I]

Since, as many have said, rail joiners loosen.  They can't be called a "good" mechanical connection.

If you are not getting a strong mechanical connection with solder you must be making cold solder joints.

When was the last time you grabbed your track, which is fastened to a table and bent it back and forth?

In my experience when solder joints fail it is typically NOT the solder that failed.  Rather it is the wire or other metal tab etc. that the wire is soldered to that fails.  I'll refer you to dknelsons post above. 

 

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:06 AM

Mea Culpa.

I did not mean to denigrate. My intent was merely to provide an easy to understand example.

In Navy Electronics Technician School I was taught to make a mechanical connection and then cover it with solder. The solder is not strong enough to be the mechanical connection.

A slip on joiner covered with solder is both strong and a good electrical connection. Any movement of the joint will eventually allow air into the joint which will allow corrosion.

If you would run your trains over the butt connected track without the solder, then the joint might be strong enough soldered. But if you are depending on the solder for anything other than electrical conductivity, you are making a mistake.

The dull looking "cold solder joint" only occurs if the joint moves while the solder is hot. Even a good job can go bad over time if it can move.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 1,089 posts
Posted by BlueHillsCPR on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:49 AM
 Phoebe Vet wrote:

Mea Culpa.

I did not mean to denigrate. My intent was merely to provide an easy to understand example.

In Navy Electronics Technician School I was taught to make a mechanical connection and then cover it with solder. The solder is not strong enough to be the mechanical connection.

A slip on joiner covered with solder is both strong and a good electrical connection. Any movement of the joint will eventually allow air into the joint which will allow corrosion.

If you would run your trains over the butt connected track without the solder, then the joint might be strong enough soldered. But if you are depending on the solder for anything other than electrical conductivity, you are making a mistake.

The dull looking "cold solder joint" only occurs if the joint moves while the solder is hot. Even a good job can go bad over time if it can move.

No es nada.

 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, January 18, 2008 1:20 PM
 loathar wrote:
Your gonna cut them on flex track anyhow. When you bend your soldered flex track around a curve, the ties are going to catch on your soldered joiners.
No I don't.  I never cut ties away until I get to the very last piece.  I slide the rail from the next piece into the ties vacated by the prior rail.  See the picture I've posted about a zillion times.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, January 18, 2008 1:23 PM
 Phoebe Vet wrote:
if you are depending on the solder for anything other than electrical conductivity, you are making a mistake.
Even if you are depending on the solder for electrical conductivty you are making a mistake.  The wire feeder or railjoiner should have good electrical contact to the rail without the solder.  The solder is just to hold that connection in place.  Lead is a horrible conductor.    The story would change if one switched to silver solder, but most don't want to spend the extra bucks for that.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!