Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Athearn Open Frame Motor and Digitrax DZ123

6111 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: St Clair Shores, Michigan
  • 98 posts
Posted by steve58 on Friday, January 25, 2008 11:55 AM

One last thing you can try to quiet it even more is get some CRC 2-26. It's an electrical contact cleaner/lube. You can get it at Home Depot, I had a hard time finding it, but if you ask they do have it. Do a search on these forums, some folks seem to think it works wonders help quiet Athearn motors. It sure doesn't hurt. Just put a touch on the com after you are done cleaning it.

FWIW, I've used the 2-26 on other stuff around the house and it seems better than many of the spray cleaner/lubes you buy.

**** 'course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong ***********
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Friday, January 25, 2008 11:00 AM

Just an update for any one who cares (and/or posterity). I finally got a multimeter that will measure up to 10A. I measure the stall current at just below an amp (.90-.95A), she runs around with an average (unburdened) draw in the .3 -.4A range. Everything looks to be a "go" for the DZ123.

 

I'm still waiting on the new flywheels. I installed the new motor pads, and that made a huge difference...I wouldn't say it runs quiet now, but it also doesn't sound like a jackhammer circling my layout!

I hope to install the decoder and lights this weekend. Thanks again to all who offered guidance.

Richard

Richard
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 7:51 AM

After searching and search and searching the 'net I finally found a link to the info. The info is actually on the Walther's site, but not linked to from the item search results for some reason. Here it is (for posterity) http://www.walthers.com/exec/productinfo/712-1033

It would appear that this is the way to go. The flywheels are sold singlely per the Walthers rep that I contacted.

Thanks again

Richard

 

Richard
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: St Clair Shores, Michigan
  • 98 posts
Posted by steve58 on Monday, January 21, 2008 10:17 PM

Apparently Timewell doesn't have a website either. Doesn't seem to be much other than the description at Walther's that says "fits Athearn S12 - SW1500".

I have one Protopower 20013 flywheel laying on my workbench. Also have one STOCK Athearn, which oddly enough I haven't thrown out yet. The stock one is 0.735" at the big end and tapers down to 0.700". It is 0.310" thick. The Proto one is 0.680" at the big end and tapers down to 0.630". So, overall it is slighly smaller than the original. The thickness is 0.375", so it is slightly thicker (longer 0.065") than the Athearn. Since the Proto is 0.070" SMALLER at the small end, I don't think the little extra length will hit anything. This is the same flywheel that I have in one of mine, but it's on a can motor.

I guess if I were doing it and not going with a new motor, I'd get the 2.4mm hole and just ream it to 0.125" BY HAND with a 1/8" drill.

One thing you'll notice, the old Athearn flywheels did not actually attach to the motor shaft. The plastic coupling went through the flywheel and the coupling was actually on the shaft. The new flywheels are nearly a press fit to the shaft (usually cemented on with loctite of some type) and then the coupling just presses on and fits in the recess in the flywheel.

**** 'course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong ***********
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Sunday, January 20, 2008 10:59 AM

I finally got around to pulling the flywheel off, and it is indeed 1/8" (0.125" / ~3mm)...Now I don't know where I will get my flywheels. Could someone with the latest Walthers catalog tell me if they list the dimensions for the Timewell Precision part #1033 in the catalog? I'm living out of last year's edition (Timewell not represented), and they don't list the info online. All of the other flywheels with 3mm shafts I can find in the old edition are too long or too wide. I guess I could get one with the appropriate external dimensions, and a smaller shaft diameter and try to drill it out to 3mm, but the less work the better!

 

The dimensions that I came up with for the current flywheels are shaft- 3mm (1/8"), OD - tapered 18mm - 20mm (11/16" - 3/4"), L - 8mm (5/16"). The OD is going to be critical as well. The shell tapers towards the cab, and a 20mm will probably rub the shell at the narrowest point, so an 18 mm OD is probably more correct.

Thanks again

Richard

Richard
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: St Clair Shores, Michigan
  • 98 posts
Posted by steve58 on Friday, January 18, 2008 11:25 PM

That's interesting. I felt like a real putz, posting info that I was unsure of. Last night I measured the shaft on two locos, a GP9 and F45, both vintage of the late 70s. In both cases, the shaft measured 0.125 inch. I guess maybe I should pull the body off the SW7, since that's the one being questioned anyway.

When I was working on the SWs, I could have also sworn that the shaft was 2.4. But then again, the larger locos have a longer motor.

**** 'course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong ***********
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Maryland
  • 178 posts
Posted by mikebo on Friday, January 18, 2008 4:57 PM

Thats interesting, I have 8 or 9 old athearn locos from the 70s' and 80's and they are all 2.4mm. I also have a few Stewarts with athearn drives and they too are 2.4 mm.

  

Mike Modeling Maryland Railroads in the 60's (plus or minus a few years)
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Friday, January 18, 2008 8:12 AM
 steve58 wrote:
 Reformed Grownup wrote:
 steve58 wrote:

Check out http://ppw-aline.com/

They make re-motoring kits, flywheels, drive line stuff, just about anything you might need.

It's their motor and flywheels that I put in the Cary bodied SW1500 (ex-SW7). They do have flywheels to fit the Athearn motor. Shaft is 2.4 mm on it.

Thanks for the link. Just so I am clear, the current "old school" shaft is 2.4 mm? I'm all set to order, but I want to make sure I'm getting the right part.

 

Thanks

Boy am I glad you posted this comment. I humbly apologize, but apparenty posted incorrect information. It looks like the shafts on the old style Athearn open frame motors are actually 1/8 inch, which ends up slightly over 3mm. I'm surprised that no one caught my mistake. I got a litttle confused, most of the flywheels listed are specifically for can replacement motors. I've been playing with several locos, cleaning, re-motoring and such. Seems like the majority of the can motors are 2mm, with a few of them at 2.4 mm.

It looks like the Timewell you found are direct replacements. If you are not changing the motor as well, they may be a good idea.

You say it takes quite a bit to start the motor. That they do. A can replacement starts at a much lower voltage, thus better starting and slow speed operation. If you rummage around (http://www.1stplacehobbies.com/cgi-bin/prod.asp?pn=116-80321), you'll find the repower kits for under $40. That takes care of several issues. Isolating the brushes, fixing flywheels, high start voltage. It's an easy job, pretty much just use silicone and glue a new motor in place.

The other small benefit is the can motor is slightly smaller, allowing just a little more room to mount a decoder and wiring.

No sweat, no humble apology necessary. I emailed Athearn, and this was their response...

"Thank-you for your inquiry. Please note that due to the fact that over the years incremental changes have made to our models we cannot tell with certainty what the diameter of the drive shaft of your locomotive is. Typically the diameter has been .125" but again we have no way of being able to tell with any certainty that this the diameter of your drive shaft."

I wish I had a set of calipers, or a micrometer...but I've formulated a creative solution...origami...I'll take a couple of small paper tabs, and cut out notches of approximately 2.4mm, 2.0 mm, and 1/8" and see which one will fit around the shaft...I may just throw out my shoulder patting myself on the backTongue [:P]

Richard
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: St Clair Shores, Michigan
  • 98 posts
Posted by steve58 on Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:19 PM
 Reformed Grownup wrote:
 steve58 wrote:

Check out http://ppw-aline.com/

They make re-motoring kits, flywheels, drive line stuff, just about anything you might need.

It's their motor and flywheels that I put in the Cary bodied SW1500 (ex-SW7). They do have flywheels to fit the Athearn motor. Shaft is 2.4 mm on it.

Thanks for the link. Just so I am clear, the current "old school" shaft is 2.4 mm? I'm all set to order, but I want to make sure I'm getting the right part.

 

Thanks

Boy am I glad you posted this comment. I humbly apologize, but apparenty posted incorrect information. It looks like the shafts on the old style Athearn open frame motors are actually 1/8 inch, which ends up slightly over 3mm. I'm surprised that no one caught my mistake. I got a litttle confused, most of the flywheels listed are specifically for can replacement motors. I've been playing with several locos, cleaning, re-motoring and such. Seems like the majority of the can motors are 2mm, with a few of them at 2.4 mm.

It looks like the Timewell you found are direct replacements. If you are not changing the motor as well, they may be a good idea.

You say it takes quite a bit to start the motor. That they do. A can replacement starts at a much lower voltage, thus better starting and slow speed operation. If you rummage around (http://www.1stplacehobbies.com/cgi-bin/prod.asp?pn=116-80321), you'll find the repower kits for under $40. That takes care of several issues. Isolating the brushes, fixing flywheels, high start voltage. It's an easy job, pretty much just use silicone and glue a new motor in place.

The other small benefit is the can motor is slightly smaller, allowing just a little more room to mount a decoder and wiring.

**** 'course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong ***********
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:30 AM
 mikebo wrote:

Richard,

 There is a good clinic in the Yahoo Group "RPMclinics-RickBell".  It's in the files area labeled Athearn Blue Box.pdf. Rick goes over a tuning an athearn engine as well as installing a decoder.

  

Thanks for the info. I signed up and I'm waiting to be "approved" by the moderators in charge.

Richard
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:27 AM
 steve58 wrote:

Check out http://ppw-aline.com/

They make re-motoring kits, flywheels, drive line stuff, just about anything you might need.

It's their motor and flywheels that I put in the Cary bodied SW1500 (ex-SW7). They do have flywheels to fit the Athearn motor. Shaft is 2.4 mm on it.

Thanks for the link. Just so I am clear, the current "old school" shaft is 2.4 mm? I'm all set to order, but I want to make sure I'm getting the right part.

 

Thanks

Richard
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Maryland
  • 178 posts
Posted by mikebo on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:22 PM

Richard,

 There is a good clinic in the Yahoo Group "RPMclinics-RickBell".  It's in the files area labeled Athearn Blue Box.pdf. Rick goes over a tuning an athearn engine as well as installing a decoder.

  

Mike Modeling Maryland Railroads in the 60's (plus or minus a few years)
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: St Clair Shores, Michigan
  • 98 posts
Posted by steve58 on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 7:09 PM

Check out http://ppw-aline.com/

They make re-motoring kits, flywheels, drive line stuff, just about anything you might need.

It's their motor and flywheels that I put in the Cary bodied SW1500 (ex-SW7).

 

Corrected incorrect information (1/18/08)

**** 'course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong ***********
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Orig: Tyler Texas. Lived in seven countries, now live in Sundown, Louisiana
  • 25,640 posts
Posted by jeffrey-wimberly on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 1:34 PM
You should do well with the DZ123. It's rated for 1 amp, 2 amps peak.

Running Bear, Sundown, Louisiana
          Joined June, 2004

Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running Bear
Space Mouse for president!
15 year veteran fire fighter
Collector of Apple //e's
Running Bear Enterprises
History Channel Club life member.
beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam


  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:20 AM

 steve58 wrote:
Not sure how much it contributes to noise or anything, but one area that always comes to my attention on the OLD BB Athearns is those junky flywheels. Todays seem to be mostly turned brass. On the old ones I have, most flywheels seem to vibrate and wobble. Seems like the newer flywheels also contribute quite a bit to smooth and quiet operation

UPDATE:

The SW& showed up last week and I started working it over. (My cheapy multimeterBanged Head [banghead] only measure up to 250mA, so no idea what the stall current is yet) I disassembled the whole unit and cleaned it up a bit. It looked like it had seen very minimal use. It made one hell of a racket when I test ran it (prior to the overhaul). It ran fine, but took quite a bit of juice to get it moving. Upon disassembling it I discovered that one of the motor pads has hardened a bit, and wasn't properly seated in the mounting hole. This is allowing a whole lot of "play" in the drive train, and there is evidence of the flywheels rubbing on the shell. I have to pick up some motor pads on my next trip to the big city, and I assume that will go a long way towards quieting things down. Just watching it run without the shell it looks like things are a bit off balance, probably due to the flywheels as mentioned above. The truck seem to roll free and easy when removed from the frame - no binding or chatter, so the noise is likely the universals chattering (it is REALLY LOUD with the shell on, and flywheels rubbing!) due to the bouncing flywheels?

 

My questions is this: Does anyone know who makes replacement flywheels to fit this model? I found flywheels in the Walthers catalog by Timewell Precision (part #712-1033) to fit SW12/SW1500's, but I'm not sure if they would do the trick. Are there others out there?

 

Thanks again for your collective wisdom.

 

Richard

 

Richard
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: St Clair Shores, Michigan
  • 98 posts
Posted by steve58 on Monday, January 7, 2008 6:41 PM
Not sure how much it contributes to noise or anything, but one area that always comes to my attention on the OLD BB Athearns is those junky flywheels. Todays seem to be mostly turned brass. On the old ones I have, most flywheels seem to vibrate and wobble. Seems like the newer flywheels also contribute quite a bit to smooth and quiet operation
**** 'course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong ***********
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Maryland
  • 178 posts
Posted by mikebo on Monday, January 7, 2008 3:45 PM
Also, if you have more than one look at how noisy or quiet they are. I've found that some of athearn drives tend to be quieter than others. They also tend to run smoother.  I have a number of old athearns that I've repowered with cans and they do make a big difference, but not an absolute necessity for DCC.
Mike Modeling Maryland Railroads in the 60's (plus or minus a few years)
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Monday, January 7, 2008 2:25 PM

Thanks to all who responded. I feel better about the possibility of the DZ123 working for this application. I will do as was suggested and clean 'er up and check the current draw. Hopefully I've got ane that draws on the lower end. I bought it on eBay as NOS, so I'm hoping it won't require too much of a rebuild.

Thanks again

Richard

Richard
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Maryland
  • 178 posts
Posted by mikebo on Monday, January 7, 2008 1:49 PM

I have an old athearn sw7 that I am using with an NCE D13SR decoder with no problems. My recommendation is to tune the loco, clean the wheels, commutator etc before you install your decoder, Replace the brushes if they are very old. If you have a DC ammeter you can test the loco to se what the stall current draw is. I found different locos to be significantly different. Mine was just over an amp at stall.

After you install the decoder you will need to fine tune the performance, the starting voltage will need to be set pretty high and the top voltage lowered to about 50%. The loco by it's limited traction and weight won't pull too many cars so by limiting the top speed you will limit the current draw.

 I don't remember exactly what the current draw running under DCC but I know it maxes under .5 amp on my RRampmeter.   It draws a lot more than any other loco I have but still way under one amp.

 

Mike Modeling Maryland Railroads in the 60's (plus or minus a few years)
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: The mystic shores of Lake Eerie
  • 1,329 posts
Posted by Autobus Prime on Monday, January 7, 2008 1:35 PM

Folks:

Don't decoders have any sort of current limiting?  I really know nothing about them, but you'd think it would be a good idea, considering that DCC is used with a rather high-current supply (often much higher than cab control) and a load that can draw quite high currents when stalled.

If they don't, how about a fuse?

 

 Currently president of: a slowly upgrading trainset fleet o'doom.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: St Clair Shores, Michigan
  • 98 posts
Posted by steve58 on Sunday, January 6, 2008 10:49 PM

I have two old Athearn BB SW7s.

One of them has a TCS MC4 and the stock motor. The decoder is tiny and to be honest, I still had a hard time getting it to stay nice in the cab and route the wires neatly so I could install the body. Yes, the big issue is to isolate the motor on the bottom. Before installing the decoder, I cleaned the motor up and lubed it. May have even put a shot of CRC 2-26 on the com. I also completely cleaned and relubed the gearboxes. At full slip, it pulls a little over .6 amp.

The other one I remotored with a Protopower kit (should be able to find for around $35 or less). One of the advantages to this is you end up with more room. The can motor takes less room that the stock open frame. I was able to install a Soundtraxz LC series decoder, putting a 3/4 inch speaker in the cab. Not sure what the current draw is on this one, but it RUNS better. On this one, I use a Cary SW1500 body.

**** 'course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong ***********
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Sunday, January 6, 2008 10:09 PM

IIRC, the Athearn SW7 would draw slightly less than one amp in full slip, so the decoder should be OK - especially if you clean up and lube the drive system before putting it into service.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Sunday, January 6, 2008 8:52 PM

 bogp40 wrote:
You could very easily repower with a decent can motor. I think you would be much happier with the overall performance and the decoder will work without worries.

I hadn't thought of that. I'm really not looking to invest too much in the loco. How much would a "decent can motor" run me? Is it much of a job to swap out? Things like this always seem to get infinitely more difficult to me once I am in the middle of them!Dunce [D)]

Thanks again.

Richard
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Ma.
  • 5,199 posts
Posted by bogp40 on Sunday, January 6, 2008 8:35 PM
You could very easily repower with a decent can motor. I think you would be much happier with the overall performance and the decoder will work without worries.

Modeling B&O- Chessie  Bob K.  www.ssmrc.org

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 196 posts
Athearn Open Frame Motor and Digitrax DZ123
Posted by Reformed Grownup on Sunday, January 6, 2008 8:31 PM

I recently bought an older HO Athearn BB SW7 with an open frame motor. I am planning to add a decoder and run it on DCC. I have read about the limited space available under the shell of this and other switchers, so I was looking for a small decoder. I came across the DZ123 on sale at Walthers. It is rated at 1 Amp (2 Amp PEAK). This is where it gets interesting...I have read that the open frame motors draw considerably more current than the newer can motors. I believe I read that the start up current is about 1.5 Amp, and stall current even more...I haven't yet received the loco, so I can't confirm the current draw.

My questions to you all are:

1) Would it be a safe assumption that the DZ123 would sizzle and fizzle in a tiny puff of smoke if I tried to run it with this motor? What is the significance of the PEAK power?

2) Does anyone have experience with this motor and DCC? (what basic, "inexpensive" -2 FX decoder has worked for you in this application?)

3) is there anything else I should be aware of (motor isolation aside) when switching this to DCC?

Thanks in advance

Richard

Richard

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!