Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Manipulating a trackplan (Updated)

1631 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 11:50 AM

Hello once again,

Thanks for the quick replies, and all.  Well, here is a short story of situation.  I'm currently working on HO layout, but I'm slowly losing the interest in the layout because I had to give up to many wants at the start.  Another reason why I kept to HO is due to the lack of funding, and I already had a small collection of HO scale stuff.  

Now, I'm looking at my situation, I and wish that I would have considered switching to N scale more before I started my layout.  I'm looking more and more into now since I'm not 100% happy with my current working layout.  I'm thinking that if I switch to N scale that I'll be able to gain more of my "wants".  

To the trackplan, I always like the "feel" and all of the Ho trackplan that I posted earlier, but I do not have the space for it, roughly ~6' x ~6' island type layout.  So my thinking is that I'll try to make an N scale trackplan, I guess similiar to it.  I guess that I'm trying to rush into this all to fast again, but I thought that I would put it up for consideration.  

I guess it's time for a little more research, thanks for the help thus far everyone, 

LilBeckett 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 11:09 AM

As others have pointed out, one of the reasons you are having trouble is that the original plan was not drawn accurately to scale. That's a challenge with other plans on that site as well.

A more interesting design that takes up a bit more space but offers a similar theme is the Appalachian Central, adapted by Lionel Strang for an MR project railroad in the January and February, 2000 issues. Operating the plan was discussed in the April 2001 issue.

For subscribers of the magazine, the trackplan is part of the on-line library.

Byron
Model RR Blog

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:45 AM
 LilBeckett88 wrote:
<snip>and scale it down to N scale

I am assuming you want a similar trackplan on a smaller footprint.  In that case I would go to 2 3x6 pieces of wood.  I would suggest maybe considering two 30-36' wide doors as baseboards.

You could scale it down directly but using standard sized pievces would be simpler.

I would like to take out the top mine near Hardy, and leave just the one near Bellfry. Add a small rural town below where I took out the Hardy mine. 

The Hardy mine covers staging.  If you remove that you will lose the staging or at least make it visible.  If you daylight the staging then you will have to consider what to do with the larger mine on the top side of the layout, since that his the other connection to staging.

One thing to consider is that the original plan isn't intended to be operated by a train runing "around" the layout.  It is intended to be an out and back arrangement.  A train of empties comes out of staging through the tunnel portal, works the mines and then goes back into staging through the tunnel.  The only time you would run a train around the loop is just for fun or for display.

 I would also like to add an industry or two on the inside of the L on the long side where there is a siding already.  

That shouldn't be a big deal.

I've played around with it some with the Atlas RR program, but I can't get the trackplan to remotely resemble the one that I found.  

Try pencil and paper or print out some 1/2 or 1/4 scale switches from the program and then use a large piece of paper to draw the plan 1/2 or 1/4 scale.  Even at 1/2 scale, it should fit on a typical dining room table.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Colorado
  • 472 posts
Posted by Greg H. on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 11:01 PM

HO cheeper than N ?

That might be true if your counting nickles or buying unusual rolling stock, but, for the most part, the price is with in a few dollers - close enough that it's a guess as to which one is actualy going to be cheeper at any given time.

In then end, HO is for rivit counters, and N is for people that want to have some scenery to go along with their trains.

Greg H.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 9:05 PM
Well I my self LOVE HO scale. It is the best scale you could possibley go with. I would consider going into HO scale if you have not already bought N scale products. Ho is (well in my experience) cheaper then N scale and you can actually see the train because its not so small. GO WITH HO MAN!! 
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Colorado
  • 472 posts
Posted by Greg H. on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 8:45 PM

Forget the Atlas program, it limits you to much as it only considers Atlas products, and IIRC, doesn't include flex track in it's data base ( which you would probably use quite a bit of for this project ).

OTOH, if you leave the layout size as is, and just do it in N scale, those curves will look real nice.

Greg H.
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 1,752 posts
Posted by Don Z on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 8:38 PM

Another item you'll need to clarify for your request.....do you plan on keeping the 2 4x8 sheets of plywood as in the original, or are you planning on scaling down the size of the layout as well?

Don Z.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 594 posts
Posted by Gandy Dancer on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 8:14 PM
 LilBeckett88 wrote:
I would like to take out the top mine near Hardy, and leave just the one near Bellfry. Add a small rural town below where I took out the Hardy mine.  I would also like to add an industry or two on the inside of the L on the long side where there is a siding already.
That is not changing it a little.   As originally drawn, the continuous run track goes "through" the Bellfry mine and is not intended to be used for normal operations.  By removing the Hardy mine and replacing it with a town virtually eliminates the hidden staging area.     

I've played around with it some with the Atlas RR program, but I can't get the trackplan to remotely resemble the one that I found.
Hmmm, the problem is that the drawing you found is not drawn to scale, it is drawn with single line rails instead of full width track, and non-standard turnouts, and you are trying to use sectional track.  To get it exactly like the drawing would require one to custom build turnouts and use flex track. 

Layout in N-scale drawn with Atlas Right-Track.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Phoenix, AZ
  • 1,835 posts
Posted by bearman on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 6:59 PM
HO scale is 1:87 and N scale is 1:160, so there is not a 1:1 increase when the scale is changed.  Would assume however, that you should be able to get something roughly approximating the original HO plan in N by using 11"N radii and doing what you are trying to do.

Bear "It's all about having fun."

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Manipulating a trackplan (Updated)
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 6:38 PM

Hello all,

I need a little bit of help with formulating a trackplan.  I've found a nice little trackplan for a HO scale layout, but I would like to change it a little, and scale it down to N scale.  I've come up with a few ideas, but would like to ask for your opinions.  Here is the trackplan that I found.

Now I don't know if I can actually do what I want with this plan.  I would like to take out the top mine near Hardy, and leave just the one near Bellfry. Add a small rural town below where I took out the Hardy mine.  I would also like to add an industry or two on the inside of the L on the long side where there is a siding already.  

I've played around with it some with the Atlas RR program, but I can't get the trackplan to remotely resemble the one that I found.   Thanks for the help, and if you need anything else just comment

Thanks,

LilBeckett 

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!