Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Rise VS Run, Math, Trains @$)(*%(%...

1403 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Renton, WA
  • 93 posts
Rise VS Run, Math, Trains @$)(*%(%...
Posted by Gryphon on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:53 AM

Okay, I have been doing some thinking and came up with a couple of ideas for my layout. My table size is limited by spacew constrictions of wall and space in the apartment. so where I can not go out I will try to go up.

If I put 12" between the two levels, how long (in inches please) would my sloping track have to be in order to maintain a 1-2% grade. Thinking of putting a staging track/ sorting yard below and  maybe a  loop  to give trains longer  run time.

 

Thanks for the help in advance. 

"Remember, if women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." Red Green THE MAN'S PRAYER "I'm a man, but I can change. If I have to. I guess." Gryphon aka: Little Lone Coyote HO Scale Modular Group Rio Pacific Railroad
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:19 AM
 Gryphon wrote:

Okay, I have been doing some thinking and came up with a couple of ideas for my layout. My table size is limited by spacew constrictions of wall and space in the apartment. so where I can not go out I will try to go up.

If I put 12" between the two levels, how long (in inches please) would my sloping track have to be in order to maintain a 1-2% grade. Thinking of putting a staging track/ sorting yard below and  maybe a  loop  to give trains longer  run time.

 

Thanks for the help in advance. 

A 2% grade will give you one inch rise in 50 inches forward. For a 12 inch rise at 2% grade, just multiply 50 inches by 12 and you need to go forward 600 inches (50 feet). An old trick to lay out an aprox 2% grade is to take a 2 foot level and tape a 1/2 inch shim to one end. Keep the shim at the lower end of the grade and the bubble will center when you have the 2% grade. A 1% grade is a one inch rise in 100 inches forward, which is the 1 to 100 ratio to make this a percentage.

Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,238 posts
Posted by tstage on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:25 AM

For a 1% grade: It's 1" of rise for every 100" (or 8'-4") of run; 2%: 2" for every 100", and so on.  So, if you want a 1% grade to climb 12", you'll need 1,200" (or 100') of track. 1/2 that for 2% grade (50').  1/3 that for 3% (33.3').

Here's a handy site: http://www.urbaneagle.com/data/RRgrades.html

Tom 

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:50 AM
And that stark reality ought to make clear why so many of us lesser mortals with small layouts resort to 3% grades.  Even if we only want to elevate our track so that we can run trains over a lower track with about 3.5" of vertical separation for a bridge deck, we have to climb quickly in the space we can afford.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Renton, WA
  • 93 posts
Posted by Gryphon on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:59 AM
THis seems to be the case do to layout constrictions.
"Remember, if women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." Red Green THE MAN'S PRAYER "I'm a man, but I can change. If I have to. I guess." Gryphon aka: Little Lone Coyote HO Scale Modular Group Rio Pacific Railroad
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 1,223 posts
Posted by jeffers_mz on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 11:52 AM

Dead minimum, 612 inches. 

Don't forget the transitions. 

;-)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 1:58 PM

1 to 2% huh?

You need a bigger room, house or shop.

Or go to 3% and buy additional engines for helper service.

Some folks rely on a Helix, round and round straight up.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 2:22 PM

Boy, can people make things complicated!

The first post specified a height difference of 12 inches, aka 1 foot.

1% grade = 1/100 = 100 foot run Shock [:O]

2% grade = 2/100 = 1/50 = 50 foot run Sad [:(]

3% grade = 3/100 = 1/33.3... = 33 foot run Whistling [:-^]

Note that the distance may be a straight line, line with a loop (Tehachapi style,) sidewinder track, pretzel shape (don't laugh - I have one) or simple spiral with or without short tangents between the end curves to keep the grade from going astronomical.

Note also that the length of run makes no allowance for a vertical curve to ease into and out of the grade.  Rough cut - add 1 foot of run per percent of grade.

A 24 inch radius spiral will gain 3 3/4 inches on a sustained 2.5% grade - good for reasonable overhead clearance if you use a thin subgrade.  Widen it (or lengthen the laps by making them oval) and the grade can be reduced.  Tighten it and you'll have to run Shays or install a rack (Mount Washington style.)

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Westcentral Pennsylvania (Johnstown)
  • 1,496 posts
Posted by tgindy on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 2:55 PM
 tomikawaTT wrote:

Boy, can people make things complicated!

The first post specified a height difference of 12 inches, aka 1 foot.

1% grade = 1/100 = 100 foot run Shock [:O]

2% grade = 2/100 = 1/50 = 50 foot run Sad [:(]

3% grade = 3/100 = 1/33.3... = 33 foot run Whistling [:-^]

Thanks again to you, Chuck!

You have a way to turn the  "@$)(*%(%"  into  "%)%*()$@"  by "simplifying the mustard" that we many times seem to inject into our layout planning.  Your explaination is going to be placed into some of the layout spirals I am currently planning.

Keep up the insight & perspective!

Conemaugh Road & Traction circa 1956

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 2:59 PM
 tomikawaTT wrote:

Boy, can people make things complicated!...

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

I don't understand, Chuck.  Can you be more specific?  I thought that we had covered the question pretty well.  He specified restricted space, a loop, and 12" of rise, but mostly he wanted the distance in inches to yield that rise.  We gave him the three common grades to help him to visualize it.

Maybe I am missing something.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Renton, WA
  • 93 posts
Posted by Gryphon on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:39 PM

This is what Texas Zepher drew out for me. I am wondering inf I can squeeze a small staging yard and helix under the main layout? 

 

 

"Remember, if women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy." Red Green THE MAN'S PRAYER "I'm a man, but I can change. If I have to. I guess." Gryphon aka: Little Lone Coyote HO Scale Modular Group Rio Pacific Railroad

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!