Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

I'm terrible at layout design!

17278 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
DJO
  • Member since
    April 2009
  • 88 posts
Posted by DJO on Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:14 AM

Sir Madog

 Leafing thru some old track plans, I found the one you see below. It was designed for a 9´ by 11´ room, but I guess it could be adapted to fit your requirements.

  

Could the 1:87 Walthers streamline cars go around these curves on this 9x12 plan?
DJ Route of the Zephyr
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:25 AM

 Minimum radius is 22", with the main lines having more than 24", so it should not be a problem to run a 85` scale feet long passenger car on this layout, IMHO.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:49 PM

Here is the one I threw together after expanding to 9x12.   Obviously still needs some work.  The little "lower" industrial area is not "modern".  Still probably some grade issues especially on the left side, but is easily fixable.   Hidden area could be made much bigger.   Industrial areas easily changed to meet what industries you would want to include.  In Oklahoma I figured in addition to the grain elevator a gravel/sand company would be common as would a lumber yard or automobile unloading area.

There are some intentional design elements here I should point out.  Yard is small is an industrial staging yard.  The lead is the inside "main".  The track at the left end is a former caboose track now used for RIP.  

The layout is actually three loops.  The third loop is the hidden area and a passing track for the outer "main".   Notice that to get from staging to the yard one must first circle the outside loop.  Likewise coming from the yard one must cross over to and circle the outside loop once before a train can arrive at staging.

There are three separate industrial areas in addition to the national guard station.  This makes a reason for the small yard.   Take a train from staging.  Take it to the yard.  Break the cars into separate trains on the tracks for each of the industrial areas.  Take returning cars from the yard.  Make the train continue on to the other end staging.   Using the local loco work each of the "trains" to the industries.  Bring the cars back from each industrial area and classify them as to which end of staging they are headed.   The local train would have to stay out of the way of other through freights or Amtrak.  Should keep one busy for a few hours.  Of course one could just throw on three trains and watch them orbit too.    

But it was just to give some ideas....    

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • 11 posts
Posted by BNSF1979 on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:30 AM

That's a very interesting layout! The fact you managed to fit not only two, but three continuous runs into it, is amazing. I like the staging area alot. I need to find some pics of tracks heading down to staging, as I have very little idea how to do a second level staging area.

I really like the yard, espicially it's functionallity. It looks like it takes care of my and the railroad's needs. Did you keep the grain silo and the outer loop track seperated from the yard so that you have to transfer over to the inner loop before you can drop anything off in the yard to propagate more of a sense of distance travelled? Just trying to understand the design so I can mayhaps not suck so much at it. :)

The "lower" industrial area is at a lower level than the yard above it? Is that how you're seeing it? So the grade raises on the bottom side, maintains around the right and then the top, then comes back down when you exit the yard on the lefthand side? How many industries could be fit inside the industrial area? 3 or 4 at the outer limits of car storage?

Yeah, we've got tons of cement and gravel industry here, there's one in my town. So I can definitly model that with interest.

 It's a very interesting design, and it puts alot of things in perspective for me! Thanks!

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:02 PM

BNSF1979
Did you keep the grain silo and the outer loop track seperated from the yard so that you have to transfer over to the inner loop before you can drop anything off in the yard to propagate more of a sense of distance travelled?

Yes.  And to get cars to the grain elevator they have to come from staging to the yard and then be assigned to a local to go back to the grain elevator.  Once again adding operational interest and distance.

The "lower" industrial area is at a lower level than the yard above it? Is that how you're seeing it?

Yes, a very non-Oklahoma thing, but I have seen this configuration in Omaha NE, Wichita Kansas and also Fort Worth, TX.

So the grade raises on the bottom side, maintains around the right and then the top, then comes back down when you exit the yard on the lefthand side?

Yes, and as drawn from the end of the yard on the left down and back to the beginning of the straight tracks in the hidden area is about 2.5% grade.  One of the places that could use some work.

How many industries could be fit inside the industrial area? 3 or 4 at the outer limits of car storage?

Unknown.  Depends on the exact industry one would want to put there.  In the era I am used to working with I can just deal with 40' box cars.  In the modern era a lumber yard is going to need some of those really long (80'?) skeleton cars, so I'm out of my off the top of my head knowledge level here.

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • 11 posts
Posted by BNSF1979 on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:05 PM

Wow, neat, I actually could see all that from your design. I'm not all that worried about being very prototypical, even in regards to having being set in Oklahoma.

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Heart of Georgia
  • 5,406 posts
Posted by Doughless on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:07 PM

It looks like things are progressing well.  In terms of designing a layout, it seems sometimes we as modelers can get involved in certain aspects of design, only to carry us away from our original ideas and druthers. Something struck me when I read this exchange.

BNSF1979:
Did you keep the grain silo and the outer loop track seperated from the yard so that you have to transfer over to the inner loop before you can drop anything off in the yard to propagate more of a sense of distance travelled?

Yes.  And to get cars to the grain elevator they have to come from staging to the yard and then be assigned to a local to go back to the grain elevator.  Once again adding operational interest and distance.

Were prototypical operations the reason you wanted to have multiple mainlines?  I thought originally, it had to do with your daughter running a throttle while you switch cars.  My observation about the above exchange is, that while you'll technically be gathering distance on two separate mainlines, your eye may not really distinguish a difference when the train runs through the same scene twice on tracks that are three inches apart. 

In my opinion, distance is created on model railroads when a train runs through a scene only once.  Unfortunately, a basement sized layout works best for this.  For those of us with less space, a certain amount of imagination must be used, in which case, running multiple laps on a single mainline accomplishes much the same thing as running though the same scene multiple times on different tracks.

On the other hand,if you want your daughter to be able to run a train while you run another, not concerned about coordinating operations to avoid collisions, that's a reason to have multiple mainlines on a smaller layout.  Perhaps as you receive feedback and go through this process, your ideas and druthers change as well.  Sometimes we have to step back and reevaluate what we are really looking to accomplish. 

- Douglas

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Eau Claire, Wisconsin
  • 7 posts
Posted by stp1000 on Thursday, April 30, 2009 1:46 PM

buy rr maazines and find a small layout that you like and copy it then expand.  it's what me and my dad did.  it woked out great so maybe you should try it

Scott Perry
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:10 PM

I'm thinking it's about time you take a stab at a new design. We can help so you feel like you are going down another wrong path. Take the ideas you like and put them together the best you can. We'll help you tweak them.  

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • 11 posts
Posted by BNSF1979 on Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:25 PM

Alrighty, I'm gonna give it a shot. I've got Xtrackcad loaded, will try that first, and if that doesn't work, back to pencil and paper! Thanks for the help.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:30 PM

BNSF1979

Alrighty, I'm gonna give it a shot. I've got Xtrackcad loaded, will try that first, and if that doesn't work, back to pencil and paper! Thanks for the help.

Be sure to run the tutorial. It is quite good and your chance of success without it are no where near as good.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!