Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

New to the forum and overview of my small HO Layout plan

5929 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • 621 posts
New to the forum and overview of my small HO Layout plan
Posted by dsmith on Monday, February 25, 2008 4:17 PM

I am new to this forum and have been reading many of the helpful hints over the last few months.  After a 30 year absence from HO,  I finally started this small layout and I would like to share my experiences so far.  My overall concept is to cram as much action and layout variation into a small space as possible.  I am not trying to make a scale prototypical layout, but just a small fun layout.

Here is the idea for the plan that I came up with.  There is an 8' pool table in my basement with a wood top that was added so that it could be used as a table.  I settled on 2, 3' x 4' modules that could be easily bolted together to form a 7' x 4' L shaped layout.  In the event the pool table was needed, the 3' x 4' sections could be unbolted and stacked underneath.  The base was made from 3/4" pine boards with 1/8" hardboard paneling glued and nailed to the top.  Layers of 1" styrofoam were white glued to the top for contouring the landscape.  After a week to let them dry, I have begun to cut, carve and sand the foam. 

The track plan consists of an outside loop that elevates toward the back of the layout and an inside figure 8 that goes up and under.  Before starting the layout I experimented with the engines and cars that I hope to run to make sure they can handle the very steep inclines and declines that I hope to use.  Both loops are intended to operate only in one direction, so inclines are about 4 degrees and declines are about 5 degrees.  I am going to use separate blocks to add power to the inclines and decrease power to the declines so that I won't have to constantly adjust the transformers.  Track diameters are 25" and 30" which is also very tight, but the tests with my short trains have shown that they can handle the tight turns and 5 degree inclines.  Also, because this is a layout intended to come apart for storage, I am going to use multipin connectors to electrically connect the 2 modules together and to connect to the transformers/control panel.

Since I am trying to get all I can in a small layout, I devised a way to have a trolley that will travel back and forth using a timing circuit to reverse the polarity, but when I need to use the siding, the trolley can be stopped at "trolley stop B", "stop A" disabled and the siding can be used for the railroad, either as a siding or to switch from one loop to the other.

I do have one question.  When connecting the two modules together, there are 5 tracks that need to be connected.  What is the best way to do this?  I am using code 100 flex track.  Can I just cut the track between the modules and add track connectors?  It seems that it would be difficult to line up all 5 tracks when mating the modules, especially the one that crosses the 2 modules at about a 45 degree angle. 

Here are a few photos...

 

 

 

 

To be continued...............................

  David from Dearborn  

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: ARCH CITY
  • 1,769 posts
Posted by tomkat-13 on Monday, February 25, 2008 6:00 PM
 dsmith wrote:

 

I do have one question.  When connecting the two modules together, there are 5 tracks that need to be connected.  What is the best way to do this?  I am using code 100 flex track.  Can I just cut the track between the modules and add track connectors?  It seems that it would be difficult to line up all 5 tracks when mating the modules, especially the one that crosses the 2 modules at about a 45 degree angle. 

 

      Cut your flex-track back  on each side so one of the standard straight track sizes can be used to bridge the gap....use what ever size you want.

     9" Straight Track

     6" Straight Track

     3" Straight Track

     1-1/2" Straight Track

 

I model MKT & CB&Q in Missouri. A MUST SEE LINK: Great photographs from glassplate negatives of St Louis 1914-1917!!!! http://www.usgennet.org/usa/mo/county/stlouis/kempland/glassplate.htm Boeing Employee RR Club-St Louis http://www.berrc-stl.com/
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 8:59 AM
 dsmith wrote:

 

Track diameters are 25" and 30"

if you use 30" r curves a 180 degree "U" turn will be 5' wide it will not fit

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:25 AM

He said 25 and 30 in DIAMETER.  So he is using 12.5" and 15" radius.  As long as he is doing trolley or 0-4-0's (maybe an 0-6-0) and 30 ft cars it will work if the track is good and the speeds are very, very low.  Anything larger than that will not work or will not work reliably.

That size benchwork is more suited towards N scale.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 152 posts
Posted by train lover12 on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 5:01 PM
 dehusman wrote:

He said 25 and 30 in DIAMETER.  So he is using 12.5" and 15" radius.  As long as he is doing trolley or 0-4-0's (maybe an 0-6-0) and 30 ft cars it will work if the track is good and the speeds are very, very low.  Anything larger than that will not work or will not work reliably.

That size benchwork is more suited towards N scale.

Dave H.

my bad

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: The mystic shores of Lake Eerie
  • 1,329 posts
Posted by Autobus Prime on Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:44 AM

ds:

Nice little layout.  I'm glad you did tests.  That's the best way to see what works and what won't.  If in practice you find it doesn't work as well as you'd hoped, the plan is small enough that you shouldn't be set back too far. 

I think this will work fine with very small equipment and trolleys.  You might want to go entirely with trolleys if you want lots of action in a small space.

By the way, while we usually deprecate alternate routes, a trolley layout is the one big exception.  You often want alternate routes for your city cars.  One nice, simple trolley plan is a pair of forked routes, back to back, with a double-tracked or passing area in the middle.  It allows cars to run on four distinct routes.  This type of plan can also be bent into a loop.

Trolley modeling is very different from mainline modeling.  You're not running a relatively simple set of complicated trains; you're running a complicated set of simple trains.

 Currently president of: a slowly upgrading trainset fleet o'doom.
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • 621 posts
Posted by dsmith on Sunday, August 24, 2008 11:03 AM

Here is an update on my layout.  Everything has been working out very well.  Because of the tight track radius (12" and 15") I have modified the front and rear engine trucks to rotate further.  This involves filing the truck sides and engine frames.  Also, some of the couplers needed there coupler housings filed to allow greater rotation.  Once these modifications were made I have had no problem with derailments.  I am running shorter diesels, up to 50' boxcars and 60' passenger cars. 

Also the steep inclines haven't been a problem either.  Both tracks have 3" rise over 60" of curving track.  Neither engine has traction tires and I can pull about 8 freight cars and caboose before slipping becomes a problem. 

The siding works well both as a train siding-switch track and as a trolley line.  There are stop tracks at both ends of the siding to allow the trolleyto stop at each end for a preset time and then reverse direction.

There is still lots more landscaping to be done and I'm having lots of fun constructing and running the layout.  I have learned a lot reading this forum, thanks everyone who has posted questions and answers.

  David from Dearborn  

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Central Georgia
  • 921 posts
Posted by Johnnny_reb on Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:18 PM

Dsmith, your layout looks great but I have one question? Did you use guide pins to help with the re-alignment of the two modules after they are unbolted, stored away and then reassembled later?

Johnnny_reb Once a word is spoken it can not be unspoken!

My Train Page   My Photobucket Page   My YouTube Channel

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Monday, August 25, 2008 12:34 AM
COOL! That turned out really nice!Thumbs Up [tup]I like all the little touches like the drive in, jet and blimp.
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Maryville IL
  • 9,577 posts
Posted by cudaken on Monday, August 25, 2008 7:55 AM

 I like the retaining wall my self. Just goes to show what you can do with limited spaces.

                      Cuda Ken

 

I hate Rust

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Phoenix, Arizona
  • 1,989 posts
Posted by canazar on Monday, August 25, 2008 11:02 AM
Wow, what an outstanding job.  You made some incredible progress.   Very well done as other noted, nice touches.  Like the design, feel to it.   You managed to pack quite a bit into a small space and pulled it off well.  Nice!

Best Regards, Big John

Kiva Valley Railway- Freelanced road in central Arizona.  Visit the link to see my MR forum thread on The Building of the Whitton Branch on the  Kiva Valley Railway

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • 621 posts
Posted by dsmith on Monday, August 25, 2008 11:48 PM
 Johnnny_reb wrote:

Dsmith, your layout looks great but I have one question? Did you use guide pins to help with the re-alignment of the two modules after they are unbolted, stored away and then reassembled later?

The two modules are held together with 2 bolts and wing nuts.  The holes for the bolts are slightly oversized so the modules need to be lined up by eye and then the bolts tightened.  There is no mechanical connection between the rails between modules,  The tracks were just lined up and glued down well at the intersecting points.  I have not had any problems with this technique even with the track that crosses the modules at about a 45 degree angle.

Thanks everyone for all the compliments, it is a fun layout.

  David from Dearborn  

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 649 posts
Posted by AltoonaRailroader on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 7:47 AM
David, that is one fine little layout wow!!! That really looks great, congrats.
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 30 posts
Posted by shlbygt500 on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:51 PM
great job on your layout, you had limited space and you made it look really good.Thumbs Up [tup]
favre is #1 drive for 5 for jeff gordon 08

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!