Trains.com

How clean

637 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Virginia Beach
  • 2,150 posts
Posted by tangerine-jack on Saturday, July 30, 2005 1:54 PM
I live very close to the Norfolk Southern trackage and corporate HQ and I've seen that most of thier locos and equipment are very clean and well kept. BUT, even for this Fortune 500 company, there are the grungy beat to H**l engines and rolling stock freely roaming the rails.

I guess it just depends on what the wife will eventualy get........................


[oX)]

The Dixie D Short Line "Lux Lucet In Tenebris Nihil Igitur Mors Est Ad Nos 2001"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 26, 2005 2:03 AM
Thanks for that, it's a bit awkward when you live in a few thousand miles away from your favourite RR location. On the whole our railways in the steam era were kept fairly clean, especially passenger steamers, but there was always a grimy one around somewhere. I can well imagine that the stock got in a heck of a mess in the depression era with funds tight but I do suppose there were plenty of proud crews who tried to keep everything clean, just glad they where working and earning.
Cheers,
Kim
[tup]
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, July 25, 2005 10:31 AM
Depends on the era.

19th cent railroads, even small ones took great pride in there engines and passenger cars, and were often kept "spit n polish" clean, however , this was like pushing a rock up a hill, railroading is an inherently filthy business, especially if your coal fired, coal dust gets everywhere, cinders, ash, dust kicked up from the roadbed, weather, etc. could make even the cleanest lokie look a real mess by the end of a run.

Later into the 20th cent when budgets got tighter, and particularly during the depression, maintanence and "spit n polish" became job #309 out of 310 items on the To-Do lists of railroads around the country, it became increasing clear that it didnt matter how dirty an engine was, as long as the engine was servicable.

Look at pics from the end of renivue service and you'll see some grimy engines, beat to hell cars, and not the best of maintained ROWs...

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: West Australia
  • 2,217 posts
Posted by John Busby on Monday, July 25, 2005 8:13 AM
Hi Kim
Steam Loco conditon varied conciderably depending on age when last overhaul and the financial state of the railway.
It is possable to find OY!! DON'T TOUCH THE DUCO GRR!! and Oh my god look at the state of that on the same railway.
Of course if the railway is run on a piece of string and some chewing gum it is more interesting to try and create working delapitasion but partners for some reason don't like that.
regards John
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
How clean
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 25, 2005 7:00 AM
Hi guys,
How clean, or dirty, were the standard run of the mill loco's operating on the narrow guage Rio Grande. I have a lot of old shots from the internet and my screen saver shows a C16 backing down a string of gons at a mine and the loco looks very clean. Was there regulations about washing the engines down or was it if and when? Lots of corrosive muck shoots out of an engines stack so was this washed off when they took on water or..................?
I'm asking this because I want to 'weather' another couple of locos but Gail likes them as they are, so do I give them a slight 'wash' to grime them up a bit or would it be dust and grime hanging off every rivet. I suspect Gail will win this one but I might just manage to grime the black loco's up without her really noticing!
Cheers,
Kim
[tup]

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy