Trains.com

Check this site out .

826 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Check this site out .
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 21, 2005 6:45 PM
Check this out it could affect you buying model products. i hope this is right.
http://modelingmadness.com/tomseditorial.htm





  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 21, 2005 6:58 PM
Hmmm


Rgds Ian
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,264 posts
Posted by bman36 on Sunday, January 23, 2005 10:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by iandor

Hmmm


Rgds Ian
I'll say! Yikes. Rgds eh...Brian.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Notheast Oho
  • 825 posts
Posted by grandpopswalt on Monday, January 24, 2005 2:12 AM
Hi Ben,

Thanks for making us aware of this website. I've e-mailed Rene and asked her and Marc to take a look as well, maybe we can start a campaign of e-mails as suggested on the website.

Walt
"You get too soon old and too late smart" - Amish origin
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, January 24, 2005 9:53 AM
Read it, doesnt surprise me, its just the same as the Union Pacific licensing fee BS.

Corporate lawyers and greedy companies out to ruin the country by squeezing any possible cash source dry. Like UP, I see a large potential public opinion backlash against them.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Centennial, CO
  • 1,192 posts
Posted by kstrong on Monday, January 24, 2005 9:27 PM
I'm quite honestly not at all surprised. It stinks of corporate greed, but that's nothing at all new. Remember, the railroads in this country were built out of corporate greed. A model company can't make a Ford MustangĀ® kit without Ford's okay. Why should we be the least bit surprised when an aircraft manufacturer makes the same deal with a model company? Ridiculous? You bet! Sky falling? I don't think so.

The fact is, arrangements like this have been made for years, we just don't hear about it. If a railroad has X locomotive, and a company wants to come measure it to produce a model, there's a good chance that the railroad will say "sure, come on over, but we want something in return." Most manufacturers are more than willing to make such arrangements with owners of various locomotives. I've had discussions with Accucraft along those lines. I don't know if this is still the case, but there were (are still?) plans to have limited quantities of a version of the C-19 available only through the Colorado Railroad Museum. They would keep the procedes from those sales in return for providing the prototype for Accucraft to take measurements from. While the greedy corporations may see a minute revenue stream, such arrangements can be a tremendous benefit to tourist railroads and museums who historically struggle for income.

Hogwarts? Thomas? Ring any bells? Exclusive arrangements, my friends. Fortunately, the greedy UP lawyers can't tell a manufactuer to not make a Big Boy, at least not based on claims of copyright. They can tell a manufacturer they can't stick "UP" on the side without paying their licensing fee, but they don't have any rights to that locomotive design. It'd be like Nascar telling a model company they can't make a model of a Ford Taurus.

Now, if someone wanted to measure the Big Boy that's at the Forney Museum here in Denver, I'd bet dollars to donuts that the museum would say "sure, but we want something in return."

One more reason to learn how to scratchbuild...

Later,

K
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Notheast Oho
  • 825 posts
Posted by grandpopswalt on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 1:50 AM
I guess this is the dark side of the free market system. Nothing is done without having profit as the eventual goal, regardless of how petty it may seem.

Walt.
"You get too soon old and too late smart" - Amish origin
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Whitmore Lake, Michigan
  • 350 posts
Posted by markperr on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:22 PM
I guess I'm more surprised that they made an F-16 in 1:32 scale. Doesn't seem like I can ever find a military aircraft in anything larger than 1:48 or 1:64. Now all we gotta do is get Grumman to agree to a 1:32 F-14 and McDonell-Douglas to agree to a 1:32 F-18 and Newport News to build a 1:32 Aircraft Carrier and we got us a Navy. Of course I'll need a forty foot long pond to put the thing in. Hmmmm???[}:)]

Mark

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy