Trains.com

To what Scale?

2192 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Vermont
  • 540 posts
To what Scale?
Posted by ondrek on Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:53 PM
I started with 1:20.3 because of the Bachmann set we bought, but when we got the Marklin engine, it was 1:32, I have a few pass cars and boxcars and flat cars, they are all 1:20.3. We do pull them behind the marklin as we never run the bachmann anymore since the marklin is so much nicer. I am torn, I want to model the 1:20 because the items seem more available, but the next engine i really want, is from USA, their 0-6-0 steam, but they are 1:32 as well. I am not sure, should i model 1:32 because of that or not?

Kevin
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:07 PM
My first and only steam locomotive was the Bachmann narrow gauge Consolidation, so I try to stay with that scale for the rolling stock. Putting a 1:32 box car behind the 1:20.3 locomotive looks very out of place.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:26 PM
I guess its somewhere around 1/20.3 and 1/22.5.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Notheast Oho
  • 825 posts
Posted by grandpopswalt on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 12:56 AM
I voted 1:24 scale. I've been collecting 1:24/1:25 scale autos and trucks, both plastic and diecast, for a long time and have about 90 items so far. However most 1:20 and 1:22 scale narrow gauge locos are way too big for the 1:24 autos. So I've started bashing the Bachmann Industrial 2-6-0 using the Big Hauler cab and tender . This yields a loco that looks "right" next to any of the 1:24 scale autos. I also replace the wheels on the rolling stock with B'mann's small diameter steel wheels . This makes the cars look smaller, because they're now lower and the smaller wheels just make the car look smaller. I've also standardized on Sunset valley code 250 aluminum rail.

This puts all the components of the railroad into the proper proportion to each other. I haven't been able to find the right combination of loco's, rolling stock , autos, and track in any other scale that's as pleasing, to me at least, as what I've described above.

Walt

"You get too soon old and too late smart" - Amish origin
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 1:52 AM
Hi guys,
I voted mix. If I like it & I can afford it then I buy it. I bought a USA pipe load flat car a couple of weeks ago & that can run in with Bachmann's 1:20.3 (allegedly) cars without any problems. I'm a great believer in the 'if it looks right then it must be right' school of railroading.
Cheers,
Kim
[tup]
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Centennial, CO
  • 1,192 posts
Posted by kstrong on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 1:52 AM
I started out doing the 1:22.5 / 1:24 thing, as that's what was available "in the beginning." Heck, when I started, we weren't even too concerned about that--american prototypes were scarce enough. That got me headed down the "narrow gauge" road, and my affection for the East Broad Top Railroad certainly helped as well. Most of my models were built to 1:24, because the math and measuring was easy.

Then, Bachmann started out with their 1:20.3 stuff. I got the Shay, but that wasn't really what turned the tide for me. That loco was to be rebuilt into a 50 ton Shay, which was a large beast to begin with, and would have scaled out very nicely in 1:22.5. What did it for me was the Bachmann Centennial mogul. I sat that next to my two 1:24 locos, and it simply dwarfed them. I knew right then that I had to "upsize" my railroad. There was just no comparison. This loco--despite its narrow stature--looked narrow gauge.

Fortunately, I didn't have a lot of rolling stock. Perhaps a dozen cars and four locos, all scratchbuilt or kitbashed. I built a tank car to 1:20.3 to test the waters, and found I really liked the size. It looked "right" sitting on the track. The rails were where they were supposed to be, so from then on out, everything I've built has been to 1:20.3. Two of my existing locos were rebuilt to the larger scale (new cabs), one loco was set out on display with a string of token 1:22.5 East Broad Top equipment, and the rest was shipped back east to my dad for service on his railway, which is still done to 1:22.5.

I've only been doing the 1:20.3 thing for four years now. My rolling stock collection is slowly building back up to where it was before I "saw the light." Since I'm scratchbuilding and kitbashing everything, I find I do a lot more research into the prototype before I sit down to build it. For me, that's much of the fun. I find I don't worry at all about what the manufacturers are going to do next. If it fits into my grand scheme, I'll perhaps buy it. Otherwise, it can sit on the shelf with all the "smaller scale" stuff. There's some beautiful stuff being produced in all the scales, and I can see why folks have a hard time choosing what they want to do. It's a great time to be getting involved in this hobby. It's certainly come a long way since the days of "If it has a cow-catcher, we'll buy it."

Later,

K
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 2:28 AM
I can only run LGB wether I wan t to or not and its 22.5 and it is all very uncomplicted and thats how I like it.

Regards

ian
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 5:29 AM
Mixed make the eye do the unthinkable.

Make it Extreme G Scale in your Garden and don't stop to look back!
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Burke, Virginia
  • 185 posts
Posted by TheJoat on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:21 AM
I started out with the Bachmann Annie and also picked up some of their rolling stock. I got some 1/24 die-cast vehicles and some 1:22.5 buildings. Then I discovered the AMS 1:20 cars and decided that 1:20 would be my future direction. Since then I've acquired the Bachmann 2-8-0 and Shay. I won't be getting rid of anything but won't be getting any of those other scales in the future!
Bruce
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: North of Chicago
  • 1,050 posts
Posted by Tom The Brat on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:02 AM
1:29, or whatever fits in.
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,264 posts
Posted by bman36 on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 4:26 PM
Hey guys,
Made my buildings at 1/24 for outdoors. I run various equipment so this puts me somewhere in the middle. As long as it looks OK I'm happy with that. Just having fun running trains. Later eh...Brian.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Notheast Oho
  • 825 posts
Posted by grandpopswalt on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:10 PM
Bruce,

I did a google search for AMS 1:20 model cars and came up empty. Can you steer me in the right direction?

Thanks

Walt
"You get too soon old and too late smart" - Amish origin
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:51 PM
I said 1:20.3 but I'm not sure exactly, what ever 9/16 works out to the foot. I don't own the loco yet, but the boxcars I'm building are built to about 9/16 to the foot. I just hope they look good behind the LGB 260 or someone may get them for a birthday or X-mas[:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 14, 2004 3:55 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by carpenter matt

LGB 260 or someone may get them for a birthday or X-mas[:D]

Was that a hint? [:D] Really Matt I thought about getting that mining kit and add cars to it so one BIG kit comes in at same time. Can you see the foam on there mouths? [}:)]
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: East Bedfont; England
  • 238 posts
Posted by powlee on Thursday, October 14, 2004 4:24 AM
I voted for mix. I ran 1/29 then I saw the Bachmann Climax and had to have it.
As I do not have any buildings on the garden layout only flowers and shrubs, the different scale does not matter as long as the train is all the same scale. I have bridges of course but as long as they of the bigger scale every thing looks okay. I run trains for fun and try not to get too serious about scale.
Cheers IAN

Ian P - If a man speaks in a desert where no woman can hear, Is he still wrong?

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Australia
  • 84 posts
Posted by Gary Crawley on Thursday, October 14, 2004 6:09 AM
Walt
I to like AMS 1-20 rolling stock, if you are looking for it it is distributed buy Accucraft, also "Rio Grande Southern Railroad Hobbies" carry a great range. (rgsrrhobbies.com)
For me 1-20 is the only scale as my layout has lots of curves and 4% grades.
If I had a large backyard I would consider standard gauge.
Also I like gear driven loco's. eg Shay.Heisler etc.
Regards
Gary
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 16, 2004 8:26 AM
Hi
I voted mix
I have all sorts but am moving towards 1:19 scale at a snails pace
regards John
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 209 posts
Posted by SandyR on Saturday, October 16, 2004 9:52 AM
I voted mix, because my locos are small. LGB/Lehmann Porter, which I think is 1:20 or so, LGB industrial steam locos, Chloe...they're all small and who knows what scale. Cars, I build to 'whatever looks right'. Buildings are mostly birdhouses, with the exception of a water tower, tipple, and train-order station, which I scratchbuilt to my own designs. And not to rivet-countin' standards, either.
I try for the effect, to get the essence of something. And it's easy enough to do when you model small industrial equipment (four-wheel shorty cars) as I do. And they go so nicely with my small garden railroad that I wouldn't change scales even if I could.
SandyR
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 16, 2004 12:10 PM
I run mostly LGB which is I think 1:22 to 1:24.However anything goes as long as it looks OK.I do have a 1:1 cat that does'nt fit in with anything.I think it has this sort of Godzilla complex!

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy