Trains.com

Coupler brand preference?

3043 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 7:28 PM
Old Dad, Other than the UV light question I would say yes. My couplers are original and ave taking abuse from coupling quite hard ( kId operators) and alot of Af cars are heavy like my metal Budd Dome passenger cars.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 7:11 AM
Hi Matt; My concern with the AF couplers is the draft gear box....will the centering springs and coupler shank hold up on the larger and heavier "G" equipment.
What would be your educated guess?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 19, 2004 6:23 PM
Old Dad, I already have a AF couplers they are attached to my AF trains though.[:D]
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Sarasota, Fl.
  • 106 posts
Posted by BudSteinhoff on Monday, April 19, 2004 8:19 AM
Started out with Aristo knuckle couplers and now have over 120 mixed mfg. cars and 20 various loco's equipped with them.
They are a little large but they work and stay connected.
Also reasonably priced.
Bud[8D]
Bud
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 19, 2004 7:15 AM
Our line uses Bachmann & K-D couplers; haven't decided on a standard. Our daughter uses the hook & loop on her Toon Town Train.

I have several sets of AMERICAN FLYER replacement couplers (these are not "S" scale) that I will be evaluating over the summer. The AF couplers are about the same size as the K-D.
Go to the F.Y.I. thread and take a look at them full size.
I'll let you know what I think of them a little later on this summer.

OLD DAD
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 15, 2004 5:38 PM
I guess so far I like Smgill's set up kadee's with moveable magnets. Has anyone else tried this?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:27 AM
Hi,

I wi***hat all the manufacturers would agree to supply a standard coupler to their products and that they supplied them with either hook & loop fitted with knuckles to transfer to or vice versa. Any body going down the kadee, loop & pin route could go on from there. It ain't rocket science - or is it??
Cheers,
Kim
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:13 AM
Some years ago I retrofitted all of my equipment to LGB because it was painless and they are reliable. If you are into a more prototypical look, they may not be your cup of tea.

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: S.Easton , Mass.
  • 593 posts
Posted by smcgill on Thursday, April 15, 2004 5:30 AM
They are the dohickies that stick to the track and the aristo track cleaner pulls up! [}:)]
They consist of two magnets and two pieces of metal(I dont know why) I just glue down the first mag. and the second sits on it.(Hot Glue)
You then slowwwwwly move the cars over and they uncouple ( I hit the train engineer's reverse button)
I like them because you can put them on any piece of track. then move them if you like.
I take the top mag. of when running track cleaner.

Mischief

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 1,264 posts
Posted by bman36 on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 11:29 PM
Hi all,
So far it's Bachmann and Aristo truck mounted. Haven't decided which one i want to standardize with yet. Probably Bachmann since I plan to install the cut bars. Then I'll make a simple tool so I can pull the pin while standing. I enjoy doing things manually. After hand bombing off a trailer load of freight at McD's I don't feel like bending over too much! Later eh...Brian.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 6:10 PM
smcgill Posted: Today, 05:35:55
My fleet uses K-dee truck mounted.
My 1:29 scale has them,along with my 1:20 scale.
I use the magnet to uncouple.

Smcgill, are your magnets electro or bar type you just pull cars over slowly to have them uncouple?
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 66 posts
Posted by jebouck on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:45 PM
I use body mounted KD 830's on all my rolling stock. They couple securely, look good, and perform as the real prototype.[^][^]
My locos use various KD's as to difference in mounting methods. I uncouple with a long flat bladed screwdriver.
John
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 3:42 PM
Using B-mann knuckles and some Link and Pin. There cheap plentifull and only need a little modification to mount.

As time goes on I see myself going to L&P exclusively but not just yet!

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:04 AM
Hi
My trains currently have LGB style couplings YUK!! they work well but the ants keep moving in too the manual uncoupling ramps and the LGB syle coupling look terrible.
So I am going over to 16mm scale center buffer and three link chain for passanger coaches and link and pin with steel pins for the freight wagons I can get localy made ones cheaper than any other brand of realistic looking coupling.
regards John
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: S.Easton , Mass.
  • 593 posts
Posted by smcgill on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:35 AM
My fleet uses K-dee truck mounted.
My 1:29 scale has them,along with my 1:20 scale.
I use the magnet to uncouple.

Mischief

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: AU
  • 320 posts
Posted by TonyWalsham on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:49 PM
I use body mounted USA Trains® knuckle couplers.
They are cheap and readily mate with Bachmann®, Delton® and Lionel®.

Depending on the height they are set they will also couple with LGB® and some Kadee's

They will not match with AC® which I don't like because AC® couplers (and some Bachmann®) do not handle backing trains very well.

My preferences have the capabilty of "pulling the pin" just like in the prototype so I use hand operated cut bars.

Tony Walsham (RCS).

Best wishes,

Tony Walsham

   (Remote Control Systems) http://www.rcs-rc.com

Modern technology.  Old fashioned reliability.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:48 PM
I'll have some comment on this on Friday, when my first set comes in.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Nebraska City, NE
  • 1,223 posts
Posted by Marty Cozad on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:29 PM

I started using body mount because I back long trains into the shop for storage . Plus I have large curves and the Kadee #830s set the cars closer so they look better. Plus I sell the stock couplers $1 each to others who like them. Thus cuts my cost on Kadees. I order a few couplers when ordering other itmes so they can be put in the box with the car. Thus saves shipping.
I cut my wire hanging down cause it looks better with out and if I do switching I use long screw driver cause I am there with the car anyway.
Roofer Marty

Is it REAL? or Just 1:29 scale?

Long live Outdoor Model Railroading.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Coupler brand preference?
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:12 PM
Wondering what brand of couplers members of this forum prefer? And why?
Also do you use an automatic uncoupler or do do it manually? Do you use body mounted or truck mounted?

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy