OK, I thought I'd start a new thread since my RECOMMENDATIONS post has gotton so large.
Here is the question: How do you ensure even voltage throughout the main line system when distances from the transformer range from a few feet to over 35 feet? Is more than one power clip to the tracks required?
Also, explaine how switches are insulated so that the spur running off the switch is controled by a seperate power source. What happens when a train on the spur line crosses the switch and enters the main line?
Class in session.......................
SRS 4501 wrote: Here is the question: How do you ensure even voltage throughout the main line system when distances from the transformer range from a few feet to over 35 feet? Is more than one power clip to the tracks required?
The easiest way is to make sure you've got really good continuity betwen each rail joint. Simply relying on the press-fit rail joiners isn't going to cut it. You need a good mechanical connection. There are variouls methods for doing this. You can solder the rail joints themselves (permanent), solder jumper wires around the rail joints (semi-permanent), or use some kind of rail clamp or screw through the rail joints (easily reversable). Many folks suggest running jumper wires, but the cross-section of the rail is far larger than the cross-section of the feeder wires, so your voltage drop as you go along the length of rail will be less than that of the feeder.
Also, explaine how switches are insulated so that the spur running off the switch is controled by a seperate power source. What happens when a train on the spur line crosses the switch and enters the main line? Class in session.......................
I recommend getting one of the myriad books on wiring your model railroad. Wiring is something that doesn't lend itself to forums, as drawings are absolutely necessary for proper interpretation. Fortunately, the wiring techinques that work for HO and N scale work just as well for large scale; it's just that you'll need a beefier power supply in the garden.
Good luck!
Later,
K
Yes well i can only endorse what has been said about continuity and voltage levels. I have about 200 m or 660' of track and you can go anywhere on the layout and the difference in voltage is not discernable; as brass track is an excellent conductor of electricity.
i run DCC and having maximum voltage on all parts of the track at all times brings good conductivity into an even more prominent position..
As far as using the points (switches) to conduct electricity to certain blocks of the track; this is a well used and popular idea, which just switches one leg of the circuit to the required block section depending on which way the point is operated.
I personally do not support this idea; for my preferred method of use, as it ruins the points internal conductivity.
Rgds ian
Thanks mate. Not sure what you said but will file it away in the memory bank. I think I'm going to just lay low for a while because I can't do anything until the Spring anyway. My head is getting so full of tips, advice, how-to's and how-not's I can't keep up with it.
So, when I can get back outside and begin work you'll be hearing more from me for sure. Thanks to everyone for all the help. I've kept a "printed" copy of every reply to my questions so it wasn't in vain you may be sure............
Happy Railroading everyone!
Modeling the Pennsylvania Railroad in N Scale.
www.prr-nscale.blogspot.com
Conductivity is measured in Mhos which is only ohms spelt backwards and it is the opposite of resistance.
You can do what you like but you will never under normal circumstances beat normal brass track for conductivity.
The problem is and always has been the joins in the track. I use 3.69m (12") track sections which means not many joins and what joins i do have except at points (switches) i use LGB joiners which are then properly soldered when they are new.
For points i use Hillman clamps, not he split jaw type they are toohard to get on. This is what is covered in the text book on the matter.
I regularly go over my track with a voltage meter and i cannot detect any worthwhile voltage drop across any of my joins unless in the rare event of a problem joint.
Regards ian
Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.
More than one feeder is sorta what I was thinking. When the time comes this is the approach I will use. (multiple feeders)
Brass track for sure. Joiners not sure about yet. Will have to study some more on that subject.
Thanks everyone...................(from a low and simple "Gandy-dancer")
GP9 man,
My LHS has 1' sections of Aristocraft track for $2-3. You might want to see if yours does the same. You can then try soldering feeders on to that section of track and see what works well for you. Remember, metal conducts heat well so if you try to solder in place you might just have a big heat sink.
Conversely (a related question so I won't start a new thread), would using heatsinks like vice grips also serve to concentrate the heat in a specific area?
The idea that you need multiple feeds to your railway is quite wrong; why would you? if barss rail is oneof the best electrical conductors you can get?
As stated previously i have about 200m or 660' track and i only have one connection and you can measure the voltage between the rails all over the set up and you always get the same about 22.7 V AC.
If this is so what would you gain from running wires to the rails.
If anyone disagrees with this i would like to hear some actual voltage drop figures ie put some facts too your opinion!
Rgds Ian
Tom Trigg
ttrigg: Would you explaine how the switches are insulated, so that the spur line running off the switch is controled by a seperate power source. What happens when a train on the spur line crosses the switch and enters the main line?
If you understand what I mean? Here it is another way:
Main line loop has two switches in it to allow trains to leave the line and enter a smaller secondary line with its own loop. This inter loop has a spur running off of it that is a dead end line going nowhere. It is used to pull trains off the loop and park.
The spur is not connected to the main power supply. It operates on its own independent power source. The siding switch is insulated so that when power is applied to the main line the spur is not affected. The engine sitting on the siding remains idle.
Now, what happens when you apply power to the spur so the "parked" engine can be pulled into the main line? Will it transition smoothly accross the insulated switch and onto the main line with out stopping or reversing? How does that work?
Hope I've made myself clear. Many thanks.
SRS this is pretty easy to do, you can remove an internal strap in the switch, so that one leg of the siding track is isolated. you then get a separate power supply with one leg in common with your main power supplly you then connect the other leg up to your siding and you have created what many refer to as an island voltage and this throttle for that section can be preste to any speed yoy like. When you throw the switch in retain direction it will remove power from thwat section you have controlled separately.
As stated previously i am not in favout of this as it damages your switches. If you go to DCC this is not rquired.
Thanks Iandor; now explaine, in the King's English, just what is DCC? How is it different from just DC? And, finally how do you operate your switches in DCC, or DC for that matter?
Thanks.
ttrigg wrote: GP-9_Man11786 "Prior to rewiring with the 14-guage wire I had terrible voltage drop from one end of the layout to the other despite having brass rails." How far, give it to me in feet or meters. I have 500 feet of track between power connections and have very little power loss. What kind of track connections? Those brass slip on's with a little grease so they can slide off quicker? Brass slip on with solder? Some type of screwed clamp? What? How do you make the power connection to your rails? I solder an "eyelet" wiring connector on the wire and pull one of the screws out of a Split Jaw Rail Clamp, pass it through, after shinning everything up nice and clean, tighten it back up, add a little flux, and a touch of solder. "I was merely copying the wiring plan from my O-Gauge club layout. I felt it was better to buy the best wiring and over-design the electrical system and not have to replace it a third time " Yes, I agree, it is better to over design than to under design, but why build the QE2 when the pond is only a stones throw wide? "(the first time I used speaker wire, BIG mistake)." YEP! Got to agree with you on that one, figured that one my self about 40 years ago. Speaker wire is for some one else's speakers. Not mine!
The main line is about 200' roughly, but I only used the stock rail joiners. The track is Aristo-Craft and USA Trains and srews together. Hindsight is always 20/20 and maybe I should have used rail-clamps but I was a junior in high school when I built the line and made some dumb decisions.
SRS mate, I have explained it as easily as i can; this is a very simple thing but not so easy to understand if you do not have the stuff in front of you and can see it with your own eyes.
I use DCC; and i am a great adherent of it and if you follow what is happening in Germany, and more affluent USA, this is the way of the future.
A DC layout is referred to as analogue and DC Direct current is applied across the rails to control the speed and direction of your loco. This is done by altering the voltage or polarity of the the DC, very simple and it has been working for as long as there has been electric model railways. It has many disadvantages but it is understood by just about everyone and is cheaper to start but not in the long run.
However DCC is to do with Digital Control and in this instance you have full AC (Alternating Current) power across the rails at all times and in all places and this by itself is a tremendous advantage.
Each piece of equipment you have must have a decoder and as you send out commands from a central station you control these items by so doing through the decoder. You can run as many trains as you like on the same set of rails and they can all be doing different things. As well you can conrol as many on board functions as you like on each loco individually. i do it with up to 8 functions, on say 4 locos at once.
As well i also control 8 sets of points (switches) through the rails, all remotely; 2 of the sets are in parallel so they both operate together. a changeover network and a siding.
Best of all, you will be open to a whole new world of control, that you cannot even dream of, such as automation, reversing loops, computer control, mimic panels and it jsut goes on.
Almost everyone on this forum will disagree with me but i think it is the only way to go!
SRS 4501 wrote: ttrigg: Would you explain how the switches are insulated, so that the spur line running off the switch is controlled by a separate power source. What happens when a train on the spur line crosses the switch and enters the main line? If you understand what I mean? Here it is another way: Main line loop has two switches in it to allow trains to leave the line and enter a smaller secondary line with its own loop. This inter loop has a spur running off of it that is a dead end line going nowhere. It is used to pull trains off the loop and park. The spur is not connected to the main power supply. It operates on its own independent power source. The siding switch is insulated so that when power is applied to the main line the spur is not affected. The engine sitting on the siding remains idle. Now, what happens when you apply power to the spur so the "parked" engine can be pulled into the main line? Will it transition smoothly across the insulated switch and onto the main line with out stopping or reversing? How does that work? Hope I've made myself clear. Many thanks.
Thanks Ian;
You responce has triggered new questions in my mind about DCC control. I will post those questions in the proper forum, not in this one.
Let's assume however, I will not be able to set up my layout using DCC control. I will instead probably go with conventional design and will require some of my sidings to be insulated against the primary power source on the main line.
I will be looking for resources on this subject. Any hints would be appreicated.
Regards,
Tom, take it easy buddy, you're not a spring chicken anymore. You might need that wind for the next installment of the newsletter.
SRS, methinks you think too much, and I mean that in a good way. Sometimes we just have to go outside and get our hands dirty and see what works by doing. It's perfectly acceptable to change your mind and your plan as you progress. The key is to START, set up some track over the winter and experiment a little, you'll learn very quickly what you like and dislike.
The Dixie D Short Line "Lux Lucet In Tenebris Nihil Igitur Mors Est Ad Nos 2001"
Tom: Wow, what a responce. I have printed a copy for my files so can refer back to it when construction of my RR begins. I think I'd like to do
DCC but afraid the cost will be too hight for me right now. I want something simple so I can GET STARTED, if you know what I mean....
Phase one will be one small loop just to get things rolling. Expansion later on, phased two, will see a larger outer loop with tunnels, bridges, and other features. The inner loop (phase one) will then have some sidings added for parking and what ever else I can think of. It will also have connecting lines joining it to the phase two outer circle.
But for now, phase one is all I can do...............still, getting my ducks in a row is important and that is why I am asking so many questions.
Thanks to all of you who have offered your advice and or experience...
I support what has been said here, get out and get somethoing going round and go from there wherever you interests and pocket cantake you;
Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month