Login
or
Register
Home
»
Garden Railways
»
Forums
»
Garden Railroading
»
Agricultural vs Industrial: A new controversy?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Hi Captain Carrales <br />At the moment my line is functionless a 30' X10' loop with a couple of sidings <br />and two points for the current extension works. <br />The plan is for this to turn into an industrial line. <br />Mainly because I want a garden as well the function is to get fire wood to the gold mines in the area. <br />Because this is an Australian Busb Tramway it needs as part of that vast expances of garden with nothing but a single ine of track are required. <br />and because it is a bu***ramway it has to move passangers and freight as well as fire wood so has a conection with the government system one of these days will have to get around to going to the schoo; of mines to see if they have a drawing of a wooden head frame. <br />It means a lot of the stock will eventualy have to be scratch built and not to may large structures to clutter up the place one mine probably being the largest structure on the system and small cluster of minners cotages have concidered even having the ladies of doubtfull reputation but not so sure that is a good idea. <br />But must have a house of worship you cannot build a railway without one not to may towns or villiages don't have a house of worship <br />regards John
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Search the Community
FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER
Get the
Garden Railways
newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month
Sign up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from
Garden Railways
magazine. Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy