Trains.com

If you could do it all over again...

4019 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
If you could do it all over again...
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 14, 2008 4:04 PM

I am building my first garden railroad. I have G scale stuff (Aristo U25-B and some cars) inherited from my dad. I don't have the track, nor the power supply yet. I am going to install about 150 feet of track with a long steady incline from the ground level up to about 4 feet off the ground and then at the opposite end, have it circle decend back to ground level. I am also going to build a waterfall/fountain system.

So.... any advice to a newbee? What brand of track, switches, etc.?

If you could do it all over again, what would you do the same? Different? 

I'll take any and all observations, opinions, advice, etc.

 

Thanks

 

Jake 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Shire Counties UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by two tone on Friday, March 14, 2008 4:40 PM
Hi JakeSign - Welcome [#welcome]  I use LGB brass track ive had no problems with it  I would recomend R3 curves and turnouts with electric switching.  My layout is controlled by the train engineer (AristoCrest) all my accessoies are by this company no probs with any of their products.   Hope this helps

                Age is only a state of mind, keep the mind active and enjoy life

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Spartanburg SC
  • 86 posts
Posted by calenelson on Saturday, March 15, 2008 8:52 AM

click here for a link to how I am doing "it"

A few things I would do different?....

Keep grades as minimal as possible...I have been rebuilding the main grade recently!

not build a tunnel that runs downhill..so does the water when it rains (and everything else!)

start with a Train-Li track bender!

do all heavy landscaping (retaing walls, etc...) first.

try to comprehend just how much work is involved in making this happen!

Study more!  Read up on layouts, plantings, operations, etc...(I did my homework on powering my trains and settled upon Battery and RC!).

Good luck! 

 

cale 

the Z... your Positive Alternative.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Omaha Ne
  • 37 posts
Posted by Don H on Saturday, March 15, 2008 1:06 PM
I'm going to do it all over again. After 24 years with he same layout, it's time to rebuild as soon as the frost is out of the ground. When I started I used 2x6 ceder for the road bed, Aristo 3 foot straight track and LGB 4 foot radius curves, that's all that was available at the time. I had very little to no problems with the old layout. I ran track power for about 18 of the years, then I converted to battery.  I used a lot of conductive grease in the joints.  The new layout is going to have 10 foot radius curves, on ladder roadbed. I using USA trains #6 switches on the mainline and LGB 1600 switches in the yards.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Saturday, March 15, 2008 1:22 PM

 chicagojake wrote:
   If you could do it all over again, what would you do the same?  Different?  

Instad of digging down for the pond, I would build up for the pond and GRR.  Then I could have much more bridge work getting down to ground level for the run through the rose beds.

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Saturday, March 15, 2008 10:11 PM
I DID do it all over againWink [;)],  and made several changes, a larger loop that over and under,  a different approach to yards and sidings, and a more scenic master plan.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: West Texas
  • 108 posts
Posted by imrnjr on Saturday, March 15, 2008 10:34 PM
 chicagojake wrote:

If you could do it all over again, what would you do the same? Different?

 

Jake -- I'm still building on my first railway, but if I could start over I'd utilize much bigger curves with 8' radius at a minimum and 10'+ radius as a standard.Tongue [:P]  I'd also reduce the grades to 2 or 3% max.... I've got one area that the grade is 4.5 to 5% which really reduces the length of trains.Black Eye [B)]

I'd make the track plan a lot simpler to start with and branch off with more complex expansions after getting the trains up and running.  Waiting *** near a year to run trains is no way to stay focused on the build, and needless to say it doesn't get the grandkids involved.

I'd also get better quality engines and not spend the money on the starter sets....I've not been very happy with the issues I've run into with mine.

Other n'at I wouldn't change much.......other than .....well maybe go DCC to begin withTongue [:P]

Mark Cowboy [C):-)]

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Notheast Oho
  • 825 posts
Posted by grandpopswalt on Monday, March 17, 2008 11:41 AM

We're moving in a couple weeks so I'll also get a chance to start over again. This time ALL of the track will be elevated. Layout will be built on modular platforms or "tables" (much, much easier to disassemble when it's time to move again ...... there's a 99% chance that the new owner will not want any hint of a garden RR in the backyard, he'll want to see a lawn). Main line minimum radius at least 6ft. (that's radius, not diameter). #6 turnouts on the mainline. RC/battery power. Trackplan designed to allow the trains to just run unattended as opposed to an operations based design (I've found that I prefer to just watch the trains run through the scenery than to play engineer/brakeman). And finally, I'd stress doing everything (locos, rolling stock, right-of-way, structures, etc) with quality rather than quantity and size in mind.

Good luck,

Walt 

 

"You get too soon old and too late smart" - Amish origin
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Monday, March 17, 2008 11:59 AM
by far the greatest mistake in my entire life was wasting my time for years on model trains before I went 7/8" scale in the garden. So saaaaaaad
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Oakley Ca
  • 1,407 posts
Posted by dwbeckett on Monday, March 17, 2008 5:16 PM
I would go to On30

The head is gray, hands don't work , back is weak, legs give out, eyes are gone, money go's and my wife still love's Me.

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Hurricane Alley, Florida
  • 469 posts
Posted by EMPIRE II LINE on Monday, March 17, 2008 5:43 PM
 chicagojake wrote:

So.... any advice to a newbee? What brand of track, switches, etc.?

If you could do it all over again, what would you do the same? Different? 

I'll take any and all observations, opinions, advice, etc.

 

Thanks

 

Jake 

Well Jake,

I am doing it all over again, the fourth, scratch that, the Fifth time, for that matter, in "G" gauge, once in Florida originally, in 95, than in Ohio 96 thru 98, again in Florida 98 thru 04, again after the hurricanes of 04 thru 06, and now for the fifth time 07 to the present.

I for one have chosen to use all Stainless Steel track, this time, as I use track power, a necessary "EVIL" some might say. However I don't think there is a feasable way of doing battery power for the equipment consists that I choose to run.

And I hated the constant cleaning of Br-***...track...

I have also chosen to do a semi-raised/modular layout. Because I have a bad back, and don't like to bend down constantly, and I live in a rental mobile park. All ponds are pretty much built up also, except for the initial drain back/sump pond, 4.5 feet down, 300 gallons.

I plan to power all mainline #6 switches with under mounted Tortise type switch machines, I use only #6's on the main line. And all wide radius 10 ft diameter switches in the run through, ladder track designed yards, in the 11 by 35 foot train storage room. I got tired of removing trains from the tracks all the time on the former layouts when ever the whether turned bad, and at night.....All housed 10 Ft switches  in the two ladder storage yards use LGB switch machines.

I know there are those who have their own personal opinions and will readily voice them. But I have for the time, chosen to use the Kietco, Loco-Linc RC system, in-conjunction with MTH's DCS system. Kiethcos system allows for RC control of the switches on the mainline also. So does the MTH, DCS system. I have designed a toggle switch system of control for the yard areas switches. 

My mainline has no curves less than 14 foot in diameter, except for only one bypass into the yard area for storage, two tracks 11.5 and 12.5 ft diameter, side by side, roughly at the halfway point in the 2000 ft long main line.

My line is divided/switched into five separate loops though-out, so that on guest "club meet" weekends, I can have separate trains on each section running un-attended, if I want. That also means visitors can run their "out-of-the-box-engines" on the track powered layout also, as well as battery powered RC units. Very versitile...... 

I like to run long consists of 33 inch long, USA streamliner passenger cars, pulled by ABBA lashups of F-3's, 50 to 60 foot long trains. As well as long 30 to 50 car freight trains, pulled by multi lashups of Dash-9's and 8's, SD-45's, Geep 38's, 9's and 7's.

That requires quite a bit of power to run train consists the likes of these. I have invested in GOOD power systems, Bridgewerks, TDR-25's, 18's, 15's and a 10. And would recommend that consideration definitely be given to that end, as to what you plan to do, run, and model.

Byron         PS: E-mail me if you'd care to talk about specifics.

        

     Here is an indication of how user friendly the Loco-Linc RC system is, My neighbors little four year old Daughter, Harley, is running a double headed Dash-9 lashup pulling a 44 car drag, about 75 foot in length , Loving the sound of the horn all the while as she moves it out....... I snapped this just 20 minutes ago.......Wednesday 7:30 PM the 18th, March, 2008....Byron

 

    

He Wore Arrow Shirts Too
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:10 AM
another thing I'd do is not purchase any trains. Much more fun to build them yourself
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Oklahoma
  • 20 posts
Posted by alamosa on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:12 AM
....I originally started with a flat surface and raised it up between 8" and 1', if I did it today it would all be raised at least 3'.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 209 posts
Posted by SandyR on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:41 PM

I originally built my small garden railroad 16" above grade. Over the past 15 years it has subsided to some 9" above grade. Now that I'm a senior citizen, I dearly wish that I had been able to build it some 24" above grade. It isn't fun leaning over or kneeling, to get the trains on the track, and sitting on the ground to watch them isn't as easy as it was years ago. Moral: plan ahead for old age!!

SandyR 

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: San Francisco Bay Area
  • 1,090 posts
Posted by on30francisco on Sunday, March 23, 2008 8:41 PM

 dwbeckett wrote:
I would go to On30

I modeled On30 before switching to large scale. Ever since I built a few structures and rolling stock in large scale, I found it very difficult and frustrating to go back to working in On30 due to the size differential. Large scale spoiled me so that I can't to go back to anything smaller. It's too bad because I think On30 is neat.  

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, April 4, 2008 6:32 PM

Track:  I vote Stainless Steel with split jaw clamps at all connections and use feeders to ensure you don't have voltage drop issues.  Go with the largest diameter curves you can get away with.  Brand, you can get 332 code SS from Aristo and www.hrtrains.com  Currently, SS rail price is cheaper (even when Aristo track is on sale at 4 for 1) through HRtrains.  I would get HRtrains rail and Aristo plastic tie sections.  SS is virtually maintenance free.

Power: Get the largest Amp power supply you can afford.  Prefer the throttle type from Bridgewerks.

Sound and control:  Went with MTH DCS and love it!

Not sure I can think of anything else. 

Good luck.

Raymond

www.rayman4449.dynip.com

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: West Australia
  • 2,217 posts
Posted by John Busby on Saturday, April 5, 2008 1:59 AM

Hi chicagojake

If I where to start again

 I WOULD NOT use anything smaller than R3 curves.

I would make sure the garden edge that should have gone in as the track bed did, its now a pain geting it installed.

Make sure I remembered to put that end cap on the exposed end of the pipe work for the wiring

I now have to rewire the whole railway (because I forgot that end cap) so I can just run a train mice did a good job of chewing up the wiring

So I have to get trains running again before I can do any more about extending the railway.

I would STILL try and blend the railway into the garden to try and create a collective whole

rather than to just have a railway in the garden.

I would also be far more selective about the trains I aquired, I have quite a mix that doesn't quite gel together.

I think I would also try to make more of the bits and pieces also some rollingstock myself

regards John

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 7, 2008 9:23 PM

First thing I would change is not spending good money on stuff I wanted at the time, but ended up selling at a loss because they didn't quite "fit" with the rest of my stuff. (have a plan, and stick to it, bargain stuff is really no bargain if you can't use it)

 I also wouldn't have purchased those 1st 2nd and 3rd generation Big Hauler sets that I ended up parting out after they crapped on me.

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 147 posts
Posted by lownote on Sunday, April 27, 2008 6:23 PM
I'd commit to 1:32 and MTH. I like the American mainline stuff,  big classic 2oth century steam, but you really need a lot of room to make it look good. I don't care for the "old West" look of narrow gage, but narrow gage stock looks muh better on smaller layouts. So the answer for me would be 1:32--the smaller size works better for modest sized layouts, and I'd go with MTH because their locos come with sound and remote and a very high level of functionality. Probably stainless steel too, and I'd start with a track bender--no more sectional track
Skeptical but resigned
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 27, 2008 9:26 PM
 EMPIRE II LINE wrote:
 chicagojake wrote:

So.... any advice to a newbee? What brand of track, switches, etc.?

If you could do it all over again, what would you do the same? Different? 

I'll take any and all observations, opinions, advice, etc.

 

Thanks

 

Jake 

Well Jake,

I am doing it all over again, the fourth, scratch that, the Fifth time, for that matter, in "G" gauge, once in Florida originally, in 95, than in Ohio 96 thru 98, again in Florida 98 thru 04, again after the hurricanes of 04 thru 06, and now for the fifth time 07 to the present.

I for one have chosen to use all Stainless Steel track, this time, as I use track power, a necessary "EVIL" some might say. However I don't think there is a feasable way of doing battery power for the equipment consists that I choose to run.

And I hated the constant cleaning of Br-***...track...

I have also chosen to do a semi-raised/modular layout. Because I have a bad back, and don't like to bend down constantly, and I live in a rental mobile park. All ponds are pretty much built up also, except for the initial drain back/sump pond, 4.5 feet down, 300 gallons.

I plan to power all mainline #6 switches with under mounted Tortise type switch machines, I use only #6's on the main line. And all wide radius 10 ft diameter switches in the run through, ladder track designed yards, in the 11 by 35 foot train storage room. I got tired of removing trains from the tracks all the time on the former layouts when ever the whether turned bad, and at night.....All housed 10 Ft switches  in the two ladder storage yards use LGB switch machines.

I know there are those who have their own personal opinions and will readily voice them. But I have for the time, chosen to use the Kietco, Loco-Linc RC system, in-conjunction with MTH's DCS system. Kiethcos system allows for RC control of the switches on the mainline also. So does the MTH, DCS system. I have designed a toggle switch system of control for the yard areas switches. 

My mainline has no curves less than 14 foot in diameter, except for only one bypass into the yard area for storage, two tracks 11.5 and 12.5 ft diameter, side by side, roughly at the halfway point in the 2000 ft long main line.

My line is divided/switched into five separate loops though-out, so that on guest "club meet" weekends, I can have separate trains on each section running un-attended, if I want. That also means visitors can run their "out-of-the-box-engines" on the track powered layout also, as well as battery powered RC units. Very versitile...... 

I like to run long consists of 33 inch long, USA streamliner passenger cars, pulled by ABBA lashups of F-3's, 50 to 60 foot long trains. As well as long 30 to 50 car freight trains, pulled by multi lashups of Dash-9's and 8's, SD-45's, Geep 38's, 9's and 7's.

That requires quite a bit of power to run train consists the likes of these. I have invested in GOOD power systems, Bridgewerks, TDR-25's, 18's, 15's and a 10. And would recommend that consideration definitely be given to that end, as to what you plan to do, run, and model.

Byron         PS: E-mail me if you'd care to talk about specifics.

        

     Here is an indication of how user friendly the Loco-Linc RC system is, My neighbors little four year old Daughter, Harley, is running a double headed Dash-9 lashup pulling a 44 car drag, about 75 foot in length , Loving the sound of the horn all the while as she moves it out....... I snapped this just 20 minutes ago.......Wednesday 7:30 PM the 18th, March, 2008....Byron

 

    

Jake,

Don't listen to E-2-L he is a wild Floridian! Big Smile [:D] Brass track is fine if you want it.

Master Toad Frog

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Hurricane Alley, Florida
  • 469 posts
Posted by EMPIRE II LINE on Monday, April 28, 2008 2:31 AM
 ToadFrogWhiteLightn wrote:

 

Jake,

Don't listen to E-2-L he is a wild Floridian! Big Smile [:D] Brass track is fine if you want it.

Master Toad Frog

An not Clean'in any track......BUTTT.....an YOU still just think'in about it.....BUTTT.....

Up an RUNN'IN, really good, TOO !!!!!

Mist'a Freaky Frog......

 

Byron C.

He Wore Arrow Shirts Too
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 28, 2008 8:12 AM
 EMPIRE II LINE wrote:
 ToadFrogWhiteLightn wrote:

 

Jake,

Don't listen to E-2-L he is a wild Floridian! Big Smile [:D] Brass track is fine if you want it.

Master Toad Frog

An not Clean'in any track......BUTTT.....an YOU still just think'in about it.....BUTTT.....

Up an RUNN'IN, really good, TOO !!!!!

Mist'a Freaky Frog......

 

Byron C.

Yeah, if I had the money for a building it would have been built by now...Mr. Shish K Bob Big Smile [:D]

And about cleaning track....you killed a LGB engine while doing so! Laugh [(-D]

Toadster

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Johnston, RI
  • 90 posts
Posted by sfcgadget on Monday, May 12, 2008 12:38 PM
I am on my 2nd rebuild at this time. The first layout and rebuild was at ground level and under a large amount of trees. All the wiring was buried under the track for power and low voltage lighting in about 30 buildings. Wrong ideas for my situation. I have since developed back problems and my knees get too wrecked crawling around for track maintenance. Leafs, pine needles and acorns along with squirrels were killing me. An electrical problem meant digging for wires. I am now starting my construction of a raised layout using cement deck supports with 4x4s to get the presure treated 2x6s that form a basic support grid up to waist level. this will be covered by a plastic coated chicken wire and weed block to form a table top. Then Tufboard will be bent to support the track and structures. A wiring bus will be secured to the 2x6s. Then dirt, sand and ballast will cover the layout. Small plants and dwarf trees will be kept in their pots and supported from underneath so they are at ground level. It is kind of like building a layout the same way you would in your basement, but outside. The nice part is maintenance will be so much easier and water will pass right through where you don't want a puddle. Landscaping won't require tons of materials and a Bobcat to move it. A pond will be set up so it looks like a delivery point for the saw mill. The track will also enter my new shed via tunnels to facilitate storage of trains. The shed was built to store trains along with a workshop for the trains and all my power tools. No more 2 hours of cleaning and moving engines and cars from the house to the layout and back every time you want to operate. This works for me. Just things to think about for others.
SFC Gadget (Ret.)

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy