Trains.com

LGB Electric Uncouper 10560.

870 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
LGB Electric Uncouper 10560.
Posted by ttrigg on Sunday, September 16, 2007 10:55 PM
I'm going to be wiring several sections of track this week.  In particular the yards.  I am planning to experiment with wiring four LGB Electric Uncouplers 10560 in parallel so that they will all rise or fall from one switch.  Has anyone done this before?  If so how well/poorly did it work/not work?  Can anyone think of why it would not work?  I have 4 of them and they are fairly close together as can be seen here:

I'm trying to avoid getting another control box.

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Monday, September 17, 2007 9:30 AM
Four? Four? Why might I ask are you using four? Is that just the way you want to do it? I would only use one located probably right before the main turnout going into the yard. That would increase operations potential by making you have to use just the one, and push the cars into the yard......but that's just me. I do think doing it that way would be more prototypical. I might be so far off base I ain't even in the ball park.
It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 76 posts
Posted by bobgrosh on Monday, September 17, 2007 10:37 AM

How would you push them without them re-connecting back together?

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 17, 2007 12:31 PM

ttrigg, I don't see why they would not work.

I do like the one switch idea though.

Toad 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Monday, September 17, 2007 4:15 PM
Any car can be slowly pushed without coupling. That's a big part of the challenge.
It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:09 AM
Since I use the LGB "Hook and Loop" on the vast majority of my stuff, pushing is almost out of the question.  Especially after just disconnecting.  One disconnect would work if it was a hump yard, but did not have the room for that, even considered it.

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:29 AM
See? I just knew I was off base. LOL
It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:37 AM

Yeah hook and loop kills the idea of one Whistling [:-^]

Any one have a G Gauge hump yard...like to see that, Trigg, How big would you have made your hump yard if given the grounds and had it?

Toad in da Swamp

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 9:08 PM
 ToadFrog WhiteLightn wrote:
  How big would you have made your hump yard if given the grounds and had it?
Toad in da Swamp


I had thought about making the hump about 8 inches tall, until I calculated that I would need about 20 foot to ramp up to  the top, and then another 20 feet down the other side and another 15~20 ft worth of yards.  Then I calculated the cost of rails to do the job would run about $1,700 US.  SWMBO vetoed that even before I had the opportunity to ask, she saw the plans and cost work up.  Of course by that time I had already given up simply because there was not sufficient room available.

Tom Trigg

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy