Trains.com

Whipped

2809 views
33 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Whipped
Posted by Fred Bear on Friday, July 6, 2007 2:04 PM
I worked withi this slip switch all day again, it will not work. It works if you contact the control rail with a piece of metal, but the trains themselves seem to do something funky to the switch. When I return from Colorado, the ole' double slip is headed to Ebay, and I'll simply build an over pass to crossover. Thanks to all of those that tried on here, especially Bob! Not your fault, what you told me to do work exactly right. Jake
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Plymouth, MI
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by chuck on Friday, July 6, 2007 5:12 PM
Is there room on your layout to replace the double slip with a pair of back to back wye's?  The inbound switch should follow normal automatic non-derail function.  The issue is throwing the second switch to accomodate the desired result.
When everything else fails, play dead
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Friday, July 6, 2007 7:10 PM

There might be Chuck, I'll have to measure it up. I never thought of doing that, in fact, I think I used two 072's back to back when I had tubular track. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll check that out. Darn shame the thing won't work like it is, it's all wired and in place, Jake

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 6, 2007 9:53 PM
It is unclear what the problem is. I saw a picture on the Atlas websight it simply has 2 standard Atlas switch machines. If it works with a piece of metal but not the train it sounds like the voltage from the capacitor is shunted to another circuit or the opposite coils are being lightly powered somehow when the train runs over the control rails.. My understanding is you are simply trying to throw them in pairs in relation to where the train is coming from. I would like to help but I am not familiar with Bobs method so I cant help you with it.

Dale hz
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Friday, July 6, 2007 10:12 PM

Jake, does it work when you connect the center terminals of the switch machines directly to the transformer's terminal B, leaving the diode, resistor, and capacitor out of the circuit?  You don't want to do that permanently.  But if you can make it work that way, it suggests that your trouble is with the capacitive-discharge circuit.  However, if it still doesn't work, there is something wrong with the control-rail wiring.  Whichever one it is, I think you might have the same problem with two ordinary turnouts.

Photographs showing how it is wired and how the rails are gapped, or a diagram like you posted before would indeed be a big help.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Saturday, July 7, 2007 7:52 AM

I'll diagram it all out, and take some photos as well and post them and see what can go from there.

You asked if it worked without the garbage all hooked up, but I was afraid to try & run the trains across that mess for fear of burning up the switches. Would it be OK to run them across it a few times, just the Engine and tender? ? Jake

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Saturday, July 7, 2007 8:33 AM

Yes.  There should be no danger in operating the coils for the few seconds that that would involve.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Plymouth, MI
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by chuck on Sunday, July 8, 2007 7:36 AM
Does the switch behave when you roll a diecast truck through it, like on a box car?  Does it work with a three axle illuminated passenger car (i.e. one with a pickup roller)?  If the switch is functioning properly under these circumstances the issue(s) are probably with the locomotives and how they interact with the switch and the circuit.  There isn't a lot of room on a double slip to accomodate all of the track pieces necessary for three rail (I'm amazed that these were even made).  The Ross version has extra wiring points and allows use of relays to energize or de-energize portion of the switch to allow for differences in distance between pick up rollers. 
When everything else fails, play dead
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 8:50 AM
I've come up with an idea for tripping the swith. I may make a small piece that will go on to the side of the track that will contact the metal and get a good connection to the switch to make that electrical connection happen to the switch. If the switch gets thrown completely, then they will work. It appears as if the switch does not get tossed all the way around sometimes. I"m leaving to fly fish Colorado with my wife for 2 weeks on Tuesday, I probably won't get a chance to work on it until I return. I also want to try conventional locomotives to see what they do. Thanks again for all the help, Jake
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 10:47 AM

What I've made is a small V shaped piece of metal from very thin stock, actually it's a feeler gauge blade from a wrecked set of guages, it's paper thin, but retains it's spring quality, It's soldered to one end of the track near the " cut " in the control rail, and as a train runs over it, it bends down and makes a very positive contact with the switch. Problem solved! Jake

PS. I hope the subsequent cars running over it will not place some weird charge into the switch. Can anyone see a problem with that?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Sunday, July 8, 2007 10:55 AM
No.  Subsequent cars will just continue to discharge the capacitor before it can recharge.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 10:59 AM
What do you think of this remedy? Jake
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Over the Rainbow!
  • 760 posts
Posted by eZAK on Sunday, July 8, 2007 11:13 AM

Jake,

Have you thought of using an IR detector to throw the switches?

Relax, Don't Worry, Have a Home Brew!</font id="size2"> Pat Zak</font id="size3">
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 11:18 AM
Is an IR detector a Circuitron thing? With the photo cells that go into the track? Jake
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Sunday, July 8, 2007 12:13 PM
Your idea is fine, Jake.  I still don't understand why the control rails don't work by themselves, however.  I have them all over my layout with no problems.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 3:06 PM

Me neither Bob, but it just doesn't want to work for some reason. Are you on Atlas track or tubular? Seems like isolated blocks of track worked better on tubular, and I know that's just plain silly. Metal is metal to a point.

Will the Circuitron thing I have throw the switch? Seems like with the photo cells, it would burn up the switches as the current stays steady until the photo cells are uncovered. Jake

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Sunday, July 8, 2007 3:36 PM

If it acts just like a contact closure and you use it to make the connections to ground that the control rails would make, then the capacitive-discharge circuit should protect the switch-machine coils.  But I don't know any particulars of the photocell gadget nor how you would be wiring it up; so I can't say.

I'd still like to see a picture or diagram of the slipswitch and its wiring.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 3:39 PM
I"m going to try & take pics later plus a digram, leaving for Colorado however on Tues, so I might have to wait until I return, Thanks much, Jake
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Plymouth, MI
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by chuck on Sunday, July 8, 2007 5:35 PM

Seems like isolated blocks of track worked better on tubular, and I know that's just plain silly. Metal is metal to a point.

The main difference is the way the outside rails are isolated on Atlas or most solid rail track.  Tubular ties both outside rails together through the metal ties.  Solid rail has a natural tendency to make isolation rails.  No need to make special track sections, but you still need to monitor placement of insulating track joiners. 

When everything else fails, play dead
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 6:38 PM
I'm wondering why when I bridge my track gap with the tip of a screw driver it works so nicely, but when the engines cross, it's incomplete? The MTH Climax worked it OK, I'm guessing I still have some little glitch somewhere in my wiring etc, I"m still going to post pics of all of this and a diagram. When I return on the 24th, I"ll try & iron this out and get these silly axx tabs of metal off my track, although they do work nicely and I'm kinda proud of the fix.  Jake
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 6:43 PM

I'm not sure how the photo cells work but they are easy to wire. Two cells are placed before your crossing, two after, they read by light sensitivity.  When the train goes over them, they complete the circuit through the board, sending electricity to your crossing gate, etc. etc. There is a ground wire as well as four leads going to the photo cells, so I'm going to guess this could all be done, but again, I'm so darned close to making this all go. Unless maybe the switch itself is not conducive to the MTH Shay or the MTH Blue Comet. I don't know. I have not tried to wire without all capacitor, resistor, and diode yet to try the train that way, although I might give that a shot before I get out of dodge.If THAT works, then I'll by a flurry of activity when I get back trying to make this all go. Jake

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Plymouth, MI
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by chuck on Sunday, July 8, 2007 6:44 PM
Check the wheel sets on the loco's in question.  Do any of them have traction tires or other odd arrangement of the wheel sets?  This could include isoaltion style (aka non conductive) axles.
When everything else fails, play dead
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 8:05 PM
I should have tried the Lionel 1666 on the thing with a tender, and I might just do that yet. Small bit of rewire to another output is all I need to do there, Might have to go try that one now, I'll report back. Jake
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 9:10 PM

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0" />

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Sunday, July 8, 2007 9:16 PM
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0" />
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Monday, July 9, 2007 12:09 AM
Jake, you've got the U terminal connected to the insulated control rails.  It should connect to all the outside rails except the control rails.  You've got the outer switch-machine terminals connected to the outside rails of the slipswitch.  The outer terminals should connect to the control rails.  The outside rails of the slipswitch should connect to the outside rails of the tracks leading to the slipswitch (but not to the control rails).

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Monday, July 9, 2007 6:43 AM

Well well well, now I see what I've done. I'll have to reverse this today before I leave tomorrow! Thanks Bob, Jake

PS. is this the problem would you guess? Why does it still work when connecting a screw driver across the gap?

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Over the Rainbow!
  • 760 posts
Posted by eZAK on Monday, July 9, 2007 12:13 PM

Jake,

Your control rail is activated by the directly opposite outside rail not necessarily from the rails fore and aft.

Click here for an IR;

http://www.lionel.com/Products/Findex.cfm

MTH also makes one.

Relax, Don't Worry, Have a Home Brew!</font id="size2"> Pat Zak</font id="size3">
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Foothills of Wva
  • 691 posts
Posted by Fred Bear on Monday, July 9, 2007 1:36 PM
Shucks, what if that rail beside your control rail is hooked to nothing????? Now I'm starting to see the problem and maybe the fix. Jake
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Monday, July 9, 2007 8:22 PM

I'll say it again, "...the U terminal...should connect to all the outside rails except the control rails."

Bob Nelson

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month