Trains.com

Compare the advantages and disadvantages of tubular track and fastrack.

26471 views
131 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:51 AM
Hey grayson well i'm glad you made a final decision on track. So when are we gonna see some pics of your progress? Can't wait to see it!
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Monday, July 9, 2007 12:49 AM

I believe since I started this post, I should announce MY FINAL DECISION, it is O gauge tubular track.

 

Long live tubular!!!!!!!!!!

Grayson

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 18, 2007 4:59 PM

ooooookay well good luck anyways......

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Monday, June 18, 2007 3:47 PM

Well zeke, you'll have to be patient! Wink [;)] I probably wont get around to starting the benchwork and bus wiring until august-november. Im building a new house, and will have a upstairs bonus room, 15ft x 20ft. , just for my layout. I will probably be completely done until decmeber or january. But i will post pics, dont worry!

Oh, and you did come across as talking bad about my choice. Disapprove [V] But, I dont really care.

 

Grayson

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 18, 2007 12:51 AM

sorry to burst your fast track bubble but i outsmarted the nosie. I put a foam/rubber material under my sheets of ply wood in between the plywood and two by 4's and i dont hear anything. Some minor noise from when a train runs threw a switch but nothing like what youll experiance.

Hey im not trying to talk bad about your choice, if im coming across that way i am sorry. I was just messing around. I cant wait to see how you doctoer it all up. So when you getting started? I wanna see pics.....im impatiant....

good luck to ya on the track.

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Monday, June 18, 2007 12:32 AM
Actually, you have to add insulating board with tubular too. Or it will be just as loud as fastrack.

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 18, 2007 12:24 AM

lol you guys crack me up...........

 

i have a question about fast whatever its called....

ok, if you use this track you have to put something under it to silence it up.....its pretty high already wouldnt that make it like rise way above the rest of your layout?

 

just wondering thanks

zeke,

totally tubular          

in california

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 1,991 posts
Posted by Frank53 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 11:39 PM
 DJSpanky wrote:

I'd start a new thread on this subject: let this one die, otherwise you'll have Frank denigrating FasTrack in every reply he makes. 

it's all in fun dennis, if it's become overwhelming, I'll back out of this discussion.

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 11:30 PM

Ok, thanks.

 

Yes Frank, YOU.

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 10:37 PM
What? What is "moi"? Internet slang?

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 1,991 posts
Posted by Frank53 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 10:29 PM
Moi?
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 10:26 PM
 Frank53 wrote:
 magicman710 wrote:

How do you create power districts in fastrack? Do you use the block sections and hook up from a bus wire and connect it to the fastrack in the block? Do you need a tpc or powermaster?

sorry, I only know how to do that with tubular - the most venerable and time-proven of all track systems. Whistling [:-^]

 

I think your trying to tell me something............................. Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 1,991 posts
Posted by Frank53 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 10:08 PM
 magicman710 wrote:

How do you create power districts in fastrack? Do you use the block sections and hook up from a bus wire and connect it to the fastrack in the block? Do you need a tpc or powermaster?

sorry, I only know how to do that with tubular - the most venerable and time-proven of all track systems. Whistling [:-^]

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 9:38 PM

How do you create power districts in fastrack? Do you use the block sections and hook up from a bus wire and connect it to the fastrack in the block? Do you need a tpc or powermaster?

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Sunday, June 17, 2007 7:01 PM

Cracking shouldn't be a problem with concrete ties.  They're prestressed, so that the entire tie is always in compression.  Any crack that existed would be pulled closed.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 4:56 PM
i'm sure that with the cost of track, ballast and wooden ties, tubular 027 may get up to $2 to $3 worth, and O gauge #3 to $4 worth, about the same as fastrack.

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 17, 2007 4:47 PM
 magicman710 wrote:

 

Hand cranked #97 coal loader ------------------------------------ automatic #97 coal loader

Box couplers----------------------------------------------------- knuckle couplers

No smoke -------------------------------------------------------smoke

 

Grayson 

 

first i know a guy who works on the railroad repalcing them ties, he sits under this cool loking maching and switches them out. He said he replaces alot of concrete ones because they are handling the wieght well. i think the wood ties are best myself.

 

i dont know about the coal loader.

 

i dont understand what you mean by the smoke or really the couplers

 

cuz i can hit a button and my cars uncouple, i dont have to touch them, and smoke , i dont get were that fits in with track, am i missing soomething?

 

you must have deep pockets to afford all that track you need. I bout 160 pieces total now all new off ebay for under 100 shipped. That came with swithes, crosses and multiple uncoupling sections, and 20 + lock ons...

 

im glad you made your choice though, cuz it was yours you werent influenced by anyone to decied your track. I choose mine for 3 reasons mainly...

 

1. Classic look, nothing beats the original.

2. flexibillity- I am free lancing my layout so i need that.

3. cost. i bought way more track then ill use and for under 100 bucks brand new. about 160 pieces of new track.

 

but hey im sure the ft will look good,  as i look at a layout i notice the track first and then the scenery and trains.

 

but hey i wasnt putting you down i was just giving you a hard time......

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Sunday, June 17, 2007 4:34 PM

Well, zeke, I'll agree with you that newer is not always better, but here's what I think. Most real railroads today are using cement ties, building and replacing with them. I've never heard of somebody arguing whether concrete or wood is better, but since cement cant rot, its good in one way, but it can crack, which is its own weakness. Wood cant crack, but it can rot. Thats how I think of fastrack and tubular, both have there advantages and disadvantages.

It's not a great analogy, but thats what i thought of. Smile [:)]

Zeke, I think you choice of tubular is a great one, and i have nothing against tubular track, I just decided i would go with fastrack.

 

Hand cranked #97 coal loader ------------------------------------ automatic #97 coal loader

Box couplers----------------------------------------------------- knuckle couplers

No smoke -------------------------------------------------------smoke

 

Grayson 

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 17, 2007 12:40 AM
 magicman710 wrote:

I think I'll go with fastrack, but I have nothing against tubular, so everybody dont get mad at me for making this decision. I will add extra ballast to make a realistic look though.

Grayson

 

well nobodys perfect..... Indifference

 

j/k I hope it works well for you. Its whatever works for you.

when i think of the differences of track i think about cars. new vs. old.

 

heres my thinking.....bare with me...lol

ya take a (random btw) 2007 mustang fully loaded vs say mine a 1964 1/2 convertible loaded..

 

 

tubular                                                    fast track

1964 1/2----------------------------------2007 mustang

classic                                                    newer

just amazing to look at                               nice to look at but missing the classic look 

cheaper                                                   expensive

parts cheaper             (switches)                   parts are expensive

people look and amazed at the detail put in                     ya its nice and pretty

flexibillty of parts                                                       has to have exact same part or piece

trustworthy  you can replace a bad piece                         cant fix or cut on 

 

this is how i look at track, maybe its more convienant to drive a new car but, when your behind the wheel of a classic muscle car there is a feeling that can never be replaced with a new style.

 

just how i look at it

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Saturday, June 16, 2007 11:42 PM

I think I'll go with fastrack, but I have nothing against tubular, so everybody dont get mad at me for making this decision. I will add extra ballast to make a realistic look though.

 

Thanks for everybody's imput, this has been a long forum, but I think i've made my final decision to go with fastrack. Oh, and If you didnt know, 153c contactors CAN work with fastrack, but the 145c contactor wont, since it has the adjustment nut on the other side of the contactor, it will prop the sectiuon up. I dont know why lionel makes you spend an extra $25 to buy a infrared controller. 

 

Grayson

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 1,991 posts
Posted by Frank53 on Saturday, June 16, 2007 10:49 PM
 magicman710 wrote:

Well, its hard to decide.

After six pages of every pro and con every thought of (and some made up), I would think you have more than enough information myself -- regardless of which way you go.

At this point, might as well flip a coin, as this has long ago gone from pros and cons to good spirited jousting.

"a good plan today is better than a perfect plan tomorrow"

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Savannah, Georgia
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by magicman710 on Saturday, June 16, 2007 10:33 PM

Well, its hard to decide. Chuck, all of the accessories and cars will operate in fastrack. The operating track section has removable roadbed for things like horse corrals, milk platforms, ect.

 

But i'm stongly going towards tubular now. You can bury the ties with ballast cant you? I like the look of just rails showing.

 

Grayson

"Lionel trains are the standard of the world" - Jousha Lionel Cowen

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 16, 2007 10:00 PM

Frank your da man!

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 3,176 posts
Posted by csxt30 on Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:54 PM
 Frank53 wrote:

Chuck - agreed on the switches. Mine work great and they're 60 years old. They have nice positive snap, and they have yet to not switch back on incoming. I admit, some can be "clunky" due to the design as in noisier as F3's make their way through. But as far as performance goes, they're still tip top.

FastTrack has it's place . . .

however, since youngsters may stumble onto this site, I will refrain from naming it. Big Smile [:D] 

Fodder for Friday night chat !! Laugh [(-D]

Thanks, John 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 1,991 posts
Posted by Frank53 on Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:53 PM

As for the lack of realism of tubular track:

looks pretty real to me, that Dennis Brennan's crushed granite ballast, and there is no confusing it with molded plastic.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:49 PM
SUPER-O
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:41 PM

 magicman710 wrote:
Zeke what happended last night? How did his kids react? Is he doing better today?

well should prolly keep this train related. My last post got deleted about him. but it did go ok and i did post about it on the pot...

 

so have you thought about which track your gonna use?

 

i like the tubular track its smooth, you get the authentic sound of train running over rails, its not very expensive, i like the way it looks much better, sorry even paint you cant hide it being plastic, may look nice but its still plastic. Plus the flexibillity, and my switches run flawlessly.

 

I also think if you buy used switches you may get someone else headache, (i know i bought 2 of ebay) but new you shouldnt have any problems. Plus how you take care of your track is a big factor i think as well.....just my My 2 cents [2c]

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 1,991 posts
Posted by Frank53 on Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:35 PM

Chuck - agreed on the switches. Mine work great and they're 60 years old. They have nice positive snap, and they have yet to not switch back on incoming. I admit, some can be "clunky" due to the design as in noisier as F3's make their way through. But as far as performance goes, they're still tip top.

FastTrack has it's place . . .

however, since youngsters may stumble onto this site, I will refrain from naming it. Big Smile [:D] 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: S.E. Ohio
  • 5,434 posts
Posted by Blueberryhill RR on Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:24 PM

Frank53.....Very well spoken.

I like tubular, because I like my PW Operating Milk car, my PW Operating Log Dump car, my PW Operating Coal Dump car, and my PW #497 Coaling Station. They all need tubular track. I've never seen them set up on Fastrack. And 022 switches, if well lubricated and maintained, will run very smoothly and have the " 2 way " nonderailing feature since the 50's. "And they are still ticking."

Chuck

Chuck # 3 I found my thrill on Blueberryhill !!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month