Trains.com

What elements do you think define a "classic" toy train layout?

7082 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: NORTHERN ALBERTA
  • 11 posts
Posted by marx3railer on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 9:45 PM
 Birds wrote:

I have been pondering this question for a while.

If one wanted to create a "classic" postwar looking layout, what elements would one need to include in the layout?

Here are a few I am including:

  • Tubular track
  • Plasticville buildings
  • "Traditional" sized engines and cars

Chris

My dream layout would use many different elements:

  • Marx Roadbed track and tubular track.
  • Tin buildings by, Marx of course, Skyline, Hafner
  • Cardboard buildings by BiltRite, Skyline
  • Diecast cars and trucks vintage only, Londontoy, Tootsietoy, Midgetoy
  • vintage background prints
  • Bridges, lights, tunnels and Telephone poles
  • People to add the right character, Lincoln, Marx,

Now if I had about another 800 sq.ft. I could put this all together

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Saint James, Long Island, NY
  • 666 posts
Posted by msacco on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 2:54 PM

Jim: email me at: occasm@aol.com.

Guys thanks for checking my layout out.I'm a little further than that now, with a lot of accessories wired.
   As far as the grade I have had no problems. Of course I don't run a ton of cars down it and I have the descending voltage set lower on it's own block and output on my new zw.  I don't run postwar steam down it although I have on occasion run a 681 with magnetraction but it can get away easily. Can motored locos with traction tires and postwar twin motors seem to do best.
A spur drive postwar steamer like a 2056 sans magnetraction would be a no-no for sure unless your manning the throttle and even then I would be nervous. I calculated the grade to a hair over 4%.

   My aerotrain with cruise creeps up and down beautifully of course.

 

Mike S.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 6:47 AM

To: MSACCO

I Tried the email link at the bottom of the post but I have no way to tell if it went through. My email has changed and I can't find a place in the update profile to change it. Thanks,

Jim

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: New England
  • 6,241 posts
Posted by Jumijo on Wednesday, March 7, 2007 5:33 AM

Great video, Mike! Nice layout!

Jim 

Modeling the Baltimore waterfront in HO scale

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 11:30 PM
 msacco wrote:

JIm,

Email me offline for more specifics but here's a video of two train operation on my layout. I did make a couple of mods from the original layout in MOdel Railroading. Added two spurs and shifted two switches' positions.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7560649863011664165&q=lionel+train+in+action&hl=en

Mike S.

I love that layout Mike, that was a nice touch cutting the corner on your trestle bridge instead of just following the wall.  One question, how careful do you have to be to keep your trains on the track on that long down hill run; looks like that could be an accident waiting to happen.  Very nice, and good use of space. 

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Southwest Georgia
  • 5,028 posts
Posted by dwiemer on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 7:38 PM

Chris,

     I have about the entire 1949 catalog worth of trains and accessories.  Of course I have since aquired a number of new items as well, but if you are going for the classic look, I would also suggest getting  a copy of a catalog from the 40's or 50's.  You may also want to get the two tone blue book on operations.  These have classic layouts and show several ideas for layout design and accessories.  I echo the classics like the log car, the milk car, cattle car, and perhaps accessories like the gateman, crossing gates, flood lights, revolving light, log loader, coal loader, etc.  One idea that I have seen that works real well, is that you have a separate track set up for the operating cars.  They were hard to get adjusted "just right" and if you could park the cars on a siding, with fixed power, you could enjoy the operation and just run the trains around the rest of the layout.  The operating cars don't get into the consist.

Dennis

TCA#09-63805

 

Charter BTTs.jpg

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Saint James, Long Island, NY
  • 666 posts
Posted by msacco on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 6:57 PM

Chris,

Personally I think the elevated section is a big part of it. I just had to have this even on my small layout. Trains crisscrossing over and under is just so cool to watch. I gave up a realistic grade just to get this kind of look and to me it's well worth it.

 Mike S.

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Mid Atlantic
  • 614 posts
Posted by Birds on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 6:46 PM

Thank you all for the responses.

I see a lot of elevated track sections in some of the old display adds.  I haven't had great success with elevated sections.

Another feature that stands out to me is that often time buildings seem to be placed as an accent piece for the track, rather than trying to be a realistic placement of the building as a building (such as next to a road wide enough for a car, on a slope that a car could climb, etc.)

Chris 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 12:12 PM

Plastic trucks.

 

Hyuck, hyuck, hyuck, hyuck.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Kaukauna WI
  • 2,115 posts
Posted by 3railguy on Monday, March 5, 2007 8:40 PM

King size matchbox trucks from the 60's goes well with a postwar layout. They are approx 1/64 scale but don't overwhelm the scene either. They are something I would put next to an oversize Xing gate or O scale figure but they do look good on background settings.

 If you scratchbuild structures, consider bright water colors and strathmore bristol board for that "Skyline" look.

John Long Give me Magnetraction or give me Death.
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 237 posts
Posted by BDT in Minnesota on Monday, March 5, 2007 7:38 PM
trestles and bridges.....Santa Fe Warbonnets,,, any steamer, and a Pennsy GG1
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Saint James, Long Island, NY
  • 666 posts
Posted by msacco on Monday, March 5, 2007 5:22 PM

JIm,

Email me offline for more specifics but here's a video of two train operation on my layout. I did make a couple of mods from the original layout in MOdel Railroading. Added two spurs and shifted two switches' positions.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7560649863011664165&q=lionel+train+in+action&hl=en

Mike S.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 5, 2007 5:00 PM

To MSACCO

The plan you showed looks very similar to the one that I am getting started on. Do you have any pictures and do you have any advice? I may have room to add another table to the right side of the layout. I would also like to have some of the outer loop elevated.It looks like I could run 3 seperate trains which would be ideal for my 3 grandkids Thanks for any help. 

Jim Eight Ball [8]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 5, 2007 4:55 PM

Plasticville? Bah!

Skyline!

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Middle o' Nowhere, MO
  • 1,108 posts
Posted by palallin on Monday, March 5, 2007 4:51 PM
"Colorful" is often used to describe postwar trains, but the rolling stock was predominately red, black, silver, and brown.  Sure, the 6464 boxcars and kin added a splash of color, and green and yellow snuck into the scheme at times, but the overall effect was really quite subdued and (dare we say it) prototypical.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: 28 Sager Place Irvington, NJ 07111
  • 265 posts
Posted by LS1Heli on Monday, March 5, 2007 4:46 PM
The 1949 showroom layout is what defines classic for me. My layout is a replica of it and for me there is no other definition. That is as classic as it gets for me. Pick up a copy of Lionel's "Model Railroading" and you will see what I mean.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Saint James, Long Island, NY
  • 666 posts
Posted by msacco on Monday, March 5, 2007 4:28 PM

Well, while I'm going to go a little beyond green sawdust when I'm up to scenic work, my track plan is all postwar. It's as stated above, tubular with more oval, geometric track shapes. Also, a fair amount of switches and a lot of track verse scenic open areas. Lots of accessories and a flagrant disregard for scale too.

Sort of like my plan based on Bantam's & Lionel's MOdel Railroading Postwar Book:

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: The Netherlands
  • 132 posts
Posted by More to restore on Monday, March 5, 2007 2:44 PM

Hello Chris,

I fully agree with the tubular track, plasticville buildings, the bright colors, the non-scale cars and buildings, etc. I just would like to add a few operating cars to finish a "classic" lay out. You can pick from many like: the Bronx zoo car with the giraffe, milk car with platform, cattle car with platform, etc.

Perhaps also "classic" is the train composition: I believe they are called the horizontal rules. Classic is in my perception also having a engine and a caboose from one railroad company and a few cars in between from different companies. That gives it a colorful classic appearance.

Good luck with the layout and send us some pictures when you are finished!

Egbert 

Nothing beats a finished and restored train car......
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 5, 2007 2:24 PM
I would add:
022 switches
A formal control panel with a ZW and lighted switch controllers
trackage that usually runs parallel to the table's edges rather than softer curves and organic shapes.
unballasted / unpainted track
bright colors - nothing weathered
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Plymouth, MI
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by chuck on Monday, March 5, 2007 1:35 PM

Tubular track and Plasticville buildings.  Multi-Colored sawdust (green for grass, brown for dirt, tan for "sand") or the green "carpet" stuff LifeLike used to make.  Bright green lichen for trees/foliage.  Oversized people and light fixtures/crossing gates/signals.  Mirrors for skating rings, maybe with magnets underneath to move the skaters.

When everything else fails, play dead
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • 1,774 posts
Posted by Dr. John on Monday, March 5, 2007 12:55 PM
Either Lionel or Flyer tubular track and accessories, prewar or postwar trains, simple, colorful scenery, and Plastiville buildings.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: New England
  • 6,241 posts
Posted by Jumijo on Monday, March 5, 2007 10:10 AM

Tubular track, painted roads and green saw dust for grass. Plasticville structures, die cast vehicles and figures, and working accessories. Semi-scale locos and rolling stock.

Jim 

Modeling the Baltimore waterfront in HO scale

  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 3,584 posts
Posted by Sturgeon-Phish on Monday, March 5, 2007 10:08 AM

Chris

When I was planning my layout my goal was to have a layout that would look like a snapshot from the 50's, using all American Flyer.  The layout is even a design from a advertising flyer.  See  the picture below.  I have stayed very close to that goal.  Granted there are things that do not look "real" i.e. a cow on the track that is half as tall as a loco, but I want the nastalgia effect so I am OK with it.  My personal guides have been original equipment, (many redone), plasticville buildings, and people, and structures I build.  Vehicles are my departure from vintage.  I use vehicles for the era made by modern manufacturers.

Simple answer, vintage accesories, equipment, track.  To stay affordable, I use less than perfect and restore to original.  At the same time, my layout is not a museum piece, I enjoy it with my grandkids.

Jim 

 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 1,991 posts
Posted by Frank53 on Monday, March 5, 2007 10:02 AM
 Dave Farquhar wrote:

I don't know if Lionel plans to reissue the K-Line figures, which were made from old Marx molds and were very nice. Vehicles and figures add a lot of life to a layout.

There is a large assortment of K-Line figures in the latest catalog.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
  • 8,059 posts
Posted by cnw1995 on Monday, March 5, 2007 10:01 AM
Those three elements are about as good as any - how about a few oversized working accessories - a gateman, coal loader, or rotating beacon.

Doug Murphy 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...' Henry V.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: MO
  • 886 posts
Posted by Dave Farquhar on Monday, March 5, 2007 10:01 AM

I would include Renwal, Marx, or other toy vehicles from the period to the list. Of course it's nice to have figures too. Too Bachmann doesn't seem to be making its figures anymore, and I don't know if Lionel plans to reissue the K-Line figures, which were made from old Marx molds and were very nice. Vehicles and figures add a lot of life to a layout.

As far as the scenery, while there were people making detailed layouts back then, the classical layout everyone had (or everyone's neighbor had) in the basement often had the roads and grass painted on.

Dave Farquhar http://dfarq.homeip.net
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Mid Atlantic
  • 614 posts
What elements do you think define a "classic" toy train layout?
Posted by Birds on Monday, March 5, 2007 9:42 AM

I have been pondering this question for a while.

If one wanted to create a "classic" postwar looking layout, what elements would one need to include in the layout?

Here are a few I am including:

  • Tubular track
  • Plasticville buildings
  • "Traditional" sized engines and cars
Chris

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month