Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.
cr6479 wrote:My lionel Santa Fe engine when starting up will catch on fire where the smoking unit would be.
cr6479 wrote:OOPS!!!!! It should a been MTH. I read the box wrong.
cr6479 wrote:She is FIXED. SF SD80 or 90 is running and retired from serivce.
cr6479 wrote:Well.. I wasn't going to retiring it that was a tyepo.
This is the funniest thread I have read in a long time.
Earl
cr6479 wrote:Well.. I wasn't going to retiring it that was a tyepo. I am putting it in my large engine holding area unitl i feel like putting it back on the main line.
Glad you got that repaired so fast & just wonder if you can give us any details on what had to be fixed. Did they just have to repair something or did they have to replace any parts ?
Oh, if you ever get a digital camera, please show us some pictures of this engine. We'll be glad to help you if you're not familiar with posting pictures !!
Thanks, John
Modeling the Baltimore waterfront in HO scale
cr6479 wrote:She is FIXED. SF SD80 or 90 is running and retired from serivce. Now this thread is a officially DEAD!!!!!!!!!
cr6479 wrote:My lionel SD80 is in the shop being repaired and i hope this doesn't happen again.
Wow! Less than four days repair time. I want the name of that repairman? I bet he was cheap, too. We don't have anybody around here that can do that type of repair that fast.
Celebrating 18 years on the CTT Forum.
Buckeye Riveter......... OTTS Charter Member, a Roseyville Raider and a member of the CTT Forum since 2004..
Jelloway Creek, OH - ELV 1,100 - Home of the Baltimore, Ohio & Wabash RR
TCA 09-64284
phillyreading wrote: Sorry if I got off on the wrong foot here so to speak but when something by Lionel in the newer versions has a problem it makes me sound off about other problems that seem to be LIONEL only!! As for csmnlm, one thing for you to take note of; How many problems have been posted on this forum about MTH's problems? My answer is very few that I have read if any. The only thing that I can say is that I have heard that TMCC is better than DCS. Lee F.
Sorry if I got off on the wrong foot here so to speak but when something by Lionel in the newer versions has a problem it makes me sound off about other problems that seem to be LIONEL only!!
As for csmnlm, one thing for you to take note of; How many problems have been posted on this forum about MTH's problems? My answer is very few that I have read if any. The only thing that I can say is that I have heard that TMCC is better than DCS.
Lee F.
Lee, there are plenty of MTH problems. Atlas has problems too. I just don't own may any more and probably will not. Might be less MTH on this forum. Who knows. I think this thread should be dead anyway. Maybe it will go to page two. Marty, same response as you from several of us [emails on this subject].
God bless TCA 05-58541 Benefactor Member of the NRA, Member of the American Legion, Retired Boss Hog of Roseyville , KC&D Qualified
Trying to update my avatar since 2020
MartyE and Kodi the Husky Dog! ( 3/31/90-9/28/04 ) www.MartyE.com My O Gauge Web Page and Home of Kodiak Junction!
csmnlm wrote: Great! Now here comes 2 pages of MTH bashing
Great! Now here comes 2 pages of MTH bashing
Why not??? Will make this thread even longer. Started off wrong.
Whoa nellie !!!!!
Now you are really going to see some flames.
Remember the Veterans. Past, present and future.
www.sd3r.org
Proud New Member Of The NRA
Jon
So many roads, so little time.
ChiefEagles wrote: jimtrumpie wrote: cr6479, From what I understand, the cause of the flame is that the smoke unit was powered up dry. When you run a fan driven unit dry, the element(s) can overheat, then crack, and short out and start a fire. I had this happen to a locomotive when I left it in neutral and walked across the room to fix a derailment. I forgot about the loco being powered up until I heard a popping sound. I looked up, and my eyes almost popped out of my head! I saw a flame very similar to what you saw. Get the locomotive fixed, and never forget to put fluid in the smoke unit. I can safely say that I won't soon forget. or turn off the smoke with the off/on switch under engine at front truck. Still can not locate a Lionel SF SD80. Give us the product ###.
jimtrumpie wrote: cr6479, From what I understand, the cause of the flame is that the smoke unit was powered up dry. When you run a fan driven unit dry, the element(s) can overheat, then crack, and short out and start a fire. I had this happen to a locomotive when I left it in neutral and walked across the room to fix a derailment. I forgot about the loco being powered up until I heard a popping sound. I looked up, and my eyes almost popped out of my head! I saw a flame very similar to what you saw. Get the locomotive fixed, and never forget to put fluid in the smoke unit. I can safely say that I won't soon forget.
cr6479,
From what I understand, the cause of the flame is that the smoke unit was powered up dry. When you run a fan driven unit dry, the element(s) can overheat, then crack, and short out and start a fire. I had this happen to a locomotive when I left it in neutral and walked across the room to fix a derailment. I forgot about the loco being powered up until I heard a popping sound. I looked up, and my eyes almost popped out of my head! I saw a flame very similar to what you saw. Get the locomotive fixed, and never forget to put fluid in the smoke unit. I can safely say that I won't soon forget.
or turn off the smoke with the off/on switch under engine at front truck. Still can not locate a Lionel SF SD80. Give us the product ###.
I'm with Chief and still could not locate a Lionel SF SD80 or SD90, but I did find reference to a SF SD 90
http://www.trains.com/ctt/default.aspx?c=lc&id=94
According to CTT is was made by MTH.
wolverine49 wrote: Kooljock1, cr6479, cxt30, et al, I apologize to whatever extent I hijacked the thread. If you go back to the beginning of the thread, and page down to the sixth post, you will see that Lee F. (phillyreading) introduced the CW-80 into a discussion of something entirely different. That pushed my button, as it always does. It's just that with all the gratuitous jabs at the CW-80, the constant ringing of the bells inside my head, an entire afternoon of football teams huddling-up and talking about me -- well, it just got to be too much. I'm only glad that it is perfectly clear that a CW-80 did NOT catch fire. Do carry on.
Kooljock1, cr6479, cxt30, et al,
I apologize to whatever extent I hijacked the thread. If you go back to the beginning of the thread, and page down to the sixth post, you will see that Lee F. (phillyreading) introduced the CW-80 into a discussion of something entirely different. That pushed my button, as it always does.
It's just that with all the gratuitous jabs at the CW-80, the constant ringing of the bells inside my head, an entire afternoon of football teams huddling-up and talking about me -- well, it just got to be too much.
I'm only glad that it is perfectly clear that a CW-80 did NOT catch fire. Do carry on.
Wolverine : that's exactly why I posted what I did ! That's where the topic changed & why I wrote what I did. When they say they aren't bashing some company, what are they doing then ? !! You don't have to apologize !! I was really the next one that did it !! Hope Kooljock isn't mad too !!
Buckeye Riveter wrote: wolverine49 wrote: Do you avoid Amtrak because the "Best Friend of Charleston" blew up back in 1831? I have been trying to find a good reason why Columbus is the largest city in the U.S. without passenger rail service. I believe this must be the reeason.
wolverine49 wrote: Do you avoid Amtrak because the "Best Friend of Charleston" blew up back in 1831?
Do you avoid Amtrak because the "Best Friend of Charleston" blew up back in 1831?
I have been trying to find a good reason why Columbus is the largest city in the U.S. without passenger rail service. I believe this must be the reeason.
Wolverine, I am still glad you posted the reason to avoid Amtrak. It will give me something to say at the next All Aboard Ohio meeting in Novemeber.
Is this the model we are talking about except in Santa Fe paint? If it is, it has always been advertised with fan driven smoke units. My CSX SD 80 can smoke you out of the room, but it has never caught fire.
After I posted the above, photo and verbage, I went and looked on Lionel's web site for SD-80 locomotives in Santa Fe Paint schemes. Lionel definitely sold SD-80s, but their on line catalogs do not show a Santa Fe Paint scheme.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month