Trains.com

what kind of camera do you use to take pic of your layout

1606 views
25 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Bethpage
  • 56 posts
what kind of camera do you use to take pic of your layout
Posted by sanman0516 on Sunday, July 9, 2006 12:45 PM
i just up graded to the Canon digital Rebal XT and what a differance from the canonpower shot A70 which is a good camera too.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Near Atlanta, GA
  • 288 posts
Posted by luther_stanton on Sunday, July 9, 2006 12:58 PM
I have a Canon Digital Rebel XT as well; awesome camera. I selected thus model primarily for railfanning. I started with a Nikon CoolPix but found it did not have a fast enough cycle time (i.e., the time between snapping a photo and when the camera is ready for the next shot). The CoolPix took about three seconds, which typically gives you one good shot of a moving train.

- Luther
Luther Stanton ---------------------------------------------- ACL - The Standard Railroad of the South
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Frankfort, Kentucky
  • 1,758 posts
Posted by ben10ben on Sunday, July 9, 2006 1:00 PM
I use a Canon FD 50mm 3.5 Macro lens on any one of my five FD mount bodies(A-1, T70, T90, TX, FTb). For film I like to use 400UC for ambient light or E100G with flash. Also use a Vivitar 283 flash where apropriate, and always off camera.
Ben TCA 09-63474
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Southwest Georgia
  • 5,028 posts
Posted by dwiemer on Sunday, July 9, 2006 3:40 PM
Have several high dollar cameras for other work ( photography is another one of my hobbies), but for most layout items, I go with the Kodak Easy Share. Simple, yet takes good photos with little messing around.

Luther, and everyone else, you can speed up to some degree, the shots per minute of most digitals by using fast, high memory cards. There is a huge difference between a 120 meg card and a 1 GB card. Plus you can get more, higher quality photos..
Dennis

TCA#09-63805

 

Charter BTTs.jpg

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 3,176 posts
Posted by csxt30 on Sunday, July 9, 2006 4:29 PM
I have a Fujifilm S5200-S5600 digital, & I think a 256 GB card.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: New England
  • 458 posts
Posted by guilfordrr on Sunday, July 9, 2006 6:29 PM
Mine is a Kodak EasyShare DX7630 digtal camera, 6.1 megapixels.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 9, 2006 7:39 PM
Nikon Coolpix 5600 digital from Ritz Camera.
5.1 Megapixels
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • 1,634 posts
Posted by pbjwilson on Sunday, July 9, 2006 8:17 PM
I use an Olympus D-540. Great for low light photos. I've always been interested in photography. The Digital cameras are really marvels of technology.
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: usa
  • 687 posts
Posted by thatboy37 on Monday, July 10, 2006 7:36 AM
sony dsc-s50, 6x's precision zoom, cyber shot with 2.1 mega pixels. this thing takes great pictures in really low light and i havent had a problem with it yet.
LIVE LIFE AS IF YOU ONLY HAVE ONE LIFE TO LIVE ! UNTIL NEXT TIME PEACE !!! REGGIE thatboy37@hotmail.com
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: cincinnati, oh
  • 8 posts
Posted by purduepete1 on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:44 PM
Canon 10D with 17-40 & 28-135 Canon lenses
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Apache Junction, Arizona It's a dry heat!
  • 351 posts
Posted by perry1060 on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 5:11 PM
I use a Sony  MVC-CD500 Digital Still Camera with a 5.0 megapixel resolution and a Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar 3X optical lens.
Enjoy the hobby Perry
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Adel, Iowa
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by jonadel on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 5:45 PM
Three years ago I started out with a very nice Olympus that didn't break the bank and I think did a fine job. Last January I made the giant leap to a Nikon D70s which is just an incredible camera. I do have a web site now and soon will post that url with the new pics of the train rooms.

Jon

Jon

So many roads, so little time. 

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,475 posts
Posted by overall on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:34 PM

a kodak easyshare p880 set on the flower ( close up ) mode

 

george

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:16 PM

I use a Kodak EasyShare DX7630.  No layout yet, but have taken some railfan pic's with itSmile [:)]

This is my second 7630 - I left the first one on an Amtrak ride to Chicago.  $400 mistake!

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Jelloway Creek, OH - Elv. 1100
  • 7,578 posts
Posted by Buckeye Riveter on Thursday, July 13, 2006 3:45 AM

An old HP 720 and they don't make them anymore.  It is a very rugged camera, ideal for taking into the field for my work.

I was fortunate enough to use CSX John's camera at my last visit and it is awesome.

.

Celebrating 18 years on the CTT Forum. Smile, Wink & Grin

Buckeye Riveter......... OTTS Charter Member, a Roseyville Raider and a member of the CTT Forum since 2004..

Jelloway Creek, OH - ELV 1,100 - Home of the Baltimore, Ohio & Wabash RR

TCA 09-64284

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 3,176 posts
Posted by csxt30 on Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:38 PM

Thanks Buckeye!! I was trying to get the same exact camera as Spankybirds, so I could get as good a pictures as him !! Maybe another 20 years of practice I'll have it !! Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]

Thanks, John

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Bethpage
  • 56 posts
Posted by sanman0516 on Friday, July 14, 2006 9:56 AM

The reason I ask this question is that I was looking at CTT the other day at the photo album section. Where it said to send it to they ask [name, add, phone #,a description of image and the type of equipment used]. Then it said digital photo must be taken with a 3.3 megapixel or higher.

How come ????  or Why

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Adel, Iowa
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by jonadel on Friday, July 14, 2006 10:34 AM
The more pixels the better image. Magazines want the highest resolution possible.

If you could take a magnifying glass to a digital image you would see thousands of little dots (pixels) thus the more dots (pixels) crammed into that picture the better the resolution.

Jon

Jon

So many roads, so little time. 

 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: New England
  • 6,241 posts
Posted by Jumijo on Friday, July 14, 2006 10:34 AM
I use a Sony Cybershot digital camera.

CTT needs large digital image files so that they will look good when printed. A small file will tend to pixelate.

Jim

Modeling the Baltimore waterfront in HO scale

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Frankfort, Kentucky
  • 1,758 posts
Posted by ben10ben on Friday, July 14, 2006 11:01 AM
Truthfully, more pixels don't really make all that much of a difference. In order to see a significant difference when  comparing two images side by side, you would need to quadruple the number of pixels. In other words, 4 megapixels are noticably better than 1, 8 better than 2, 16 better than four, and so one.

What does make a big difference is the physical size of the pixels on the sensor. 12 megapixels on a chip the size of your pinkie fingernail will look like crap. This is because each pixel is so small that it's not very sensitive to light, and the camera has to amplify the signal more. This increases noise(digital grain) so it looks bad. 12 megapixels on a sensor 16mmx24mm look really good because each one does not have to be amplified so much. 12 megapixels on a 24mmx36mm sensor looks great for this same reason.

There's a reason why Nikons current DSLR meant for photojournalists(D2H) only has 4 megapixels. This allows it to perform really, really well in low light without flash and not get noisy at high ISOs.
Ben TCA 09-63474
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
Posted by spankybird on Friday, July 14, 2006 11:07 AM
I have a Fujifilm S3100. It is a 4 magpixal camera with 6 to 1 opical zoom. I also have a 256 mg card for it. This is the older version of John (csxt30) camera. It has 4 basic setting that each one can be programed. This makes taking pic really easy, as you just have to make one or two chnages to get your pics.

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 14, 2006 11:46 AM

 pbjwilson wrote:
I use an Olympus D-540. Great for low light photos. I've always been interested in photography. The Digital cameras are really marvels of technology.

Oh my gosh! your avatar scared me there a sec.!  Is that an emu?  correct spelling??

  • Member since
    October 2011
  • From: Central North Carolina
  • 99 posts
Posted by JeffPo on Friday, July 14, 2006 12:09 PM

My main camera is a Nikon Coolpix 995 (3.3mp).  I haven't used my film cameras in a few years.  My Coolpix 995 has performed well.  However, I have been considering getting a Canon Rebel XT (or a 20D if I could afford it).  Another hobby of mine is astronomy and people have been using digital SLR cameras with wonderful results.

http://im1.shutterfly.com/procserv/47b6d935b3127cce8b1d9a7466e400000016100AbOHLhw3cMWPg" border="0" />

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Michigan - Nevada in winter time
  • 249 posts
Posted by IronHoarse on Friday, July 14, 2006 12:23 PM
I have a Can PowerShot A40.  2 MP and has optical zoom.  128 MB card that holds about 100 high quality pictures.
Ironhoarse "Time is nature's way of preventing everything from happening all at once."
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • 1,634 posts
Posted by pbjwilson on Friday, July 14, 2006 11:06 PM
 daniels wrote:

 pbjwilson wrote:
I use an Olympus D-540. Great for low light photos. I've always been interested in photography. The Digital cameras are really marvels of technology.

Oh my gosh! your avatar scared me there a sec.!  Is that an emu?  correct spelling??

My 10 yr. old son found this on the internet. Good picture to send to his friends. And yes its an emu.

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9 posts
Posted by tapstrains on Saturday, July 15, 2006 10:59 AM

My daughter gave me an Olympus Fe 100, 4 megapixel digital camera last Christmas. It takes great pictures but I find the built in flash lacking in taking photos of my layout.

 

I prefer to use my Nikon 8008 SLR with an SB24 flash unit or even use my studio flash and umbrella modeling lights to really get the high quality, realistic lighting that I desire.

I can have both photos (prints) and a CD made. The quality of the SLR photos when digitized far surpasses anything available in a digital camera.

Steve

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month