Why? Track mfg. decision

[Anonymous]

Why, why, why, do I hear so many layout builders say they use Ross switches with Gargraves track. I am planning a layout and I want realistic, good running track. As I research this issue I keep seeing posts with Ross switches and Gargraves track in that combination.
1. Are Gargraves switches substandard compared to their track, or to Ross switches?
2. Is Ross track substandard compared to their switches, or to Gargraves track?

I can't seem to reconcile the combination choice. Why not just use all of Ross stuff or all of Gargraves stuff? What's the scoop? I'm new and in the research phase, so be nice.[%-)]

[Anonymous]

I think it came about because originally Ross only made switches. Their switches, unlike Gargraves, have individually spiked ties. They also made a number of different sizes and types while GarGraves had only one size. So if you wanted the best, you used GarGraves Flex track with Ross switches. Over the years, GarGraves has made some other sizes and Ross has added track to its line. So, now it's possible to use just Ross for both track and switches. Today people still use both because GarGraves makes flex track and Ross doesn't. That's only important to those who want to bend their own.

Now, of course, you might also want to consider Atlas O, who makes the most realistic looking track and has a variety of switches and other track related products. I suggest getting information from each manufacturer and then deciding what will work best for you.

Dennis

[ben10ben]

The big reason why people don't use Ross track is because its expensive, especially when compared to Gargraves flextrack. Most agree that Ross switches are worth the added cost, but their track really offers nothing more than individually spiked rails for its much higher cost. Many people will also get the same look by adding spikes to their Gargraves flextrack.

[Anonymous]

Nothing at all wrong with using all-Ross track and switches. The track is more costly, but the switches are generally reported to be the best made in O gauge. If you can afford to go with both, then surely that is a wholly appropriate solution. Gargraves switches are a bit more problematic, so going with an all-Gargraves layout may not be as viable a solution (which is why many folks tend to mix the two).

I use Atlas track and switches now, for any Hi-Rail layout I build, but would probably go with an all-Ross layout if I was building my "dream pike" and knew that it was going to remain in place for a long time.

[Roger Bielen]

The Ross switches also look a bit more protypical.

[overall]

I have not had very good luck with the GarGrave switches. Some of my O gauge cars tend to pick the points of Gargrave switches so there are de-railment problems with them. I took the dremel tool with a grinding wheel to one of my Gargrave switches which seemed to help.I have also had compatibilty problems with Lionel 072 switches, especially with me Willams E-8's. Atlas switches are the best I've tried. I cannot speak to the Ross custom switches because I have never tried them.

George

[ChiefEagles]

I think a lot has to do with personal preferences.