Trains.com

MTH railsound differences between proto and proto 2.0

3894 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 8, 2005 2:12 PM
I just figured out that the one "offending" engine does in fact have "locosound". Not at all a good sound. I guess I may just turn the sound off for now. But I do now understand that the PS 1 and PS 2.0 are digitally recorded sounds like the railsounds on my Lionel. I will be shopping for a speed control engine with either PS 2.o ( as I understand it PS 1.0 doesn't have speed control) or a Lionel with Odyssey speed control. Thanks guys, you have been a great help.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 8, 2005 10:49 AM
"If you are running more then one engine at a time it really doesn't matter if the sound is on or not it will probably be drowned out, ..."


Very true. I tend to throw the signals sound switch on most of my loco's so I just get horn/whistle and bell sounds. Leave one steamer and one diesel in full sound mode.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Millersburg, Pa.
  • 7,607 posts
Posted by laz 57 on Thursday, December 8, 2005 9:26 AM
If you are running more then one engine at a time it really doesn't matter if the sound is on or not it will probably be drowned out, depending on the length of the consist and your layout. I run about 7 engines at once and it sounds all garbled until the engine runs close to you. Same results with about four engines at once.
Just my 2 cents.
laz57
  There's a race of men that don't fit in, A race that can't stay still; Robert Service. TCA 03-55991
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 8, 2005 9:07 AM
"And if you don't like that sound, but do like one from another engine, have it down loaded to the engine that you want."


Assuming it uses the same tach tape.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
Posted by spankybird on Thursday, December 8, 2005 8:33 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chuckn

If the sounds are extrememly important to you, I'd listen to the actual engine you are considering buying at a local shop/show/club before making a decision.


And if you don't like that sound, but do like one from another engine, have it down loaded to the engine that you want. [:p]

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 8, 2005 8:08 AM
If you didn't care for ProtoSounds (now called PS-1) you will definitely not like LocoSounds. LocoSounds are digitally synthesized sounds and bear little or no resemblence to what any locomotive (diesel/steam/electric) actually sounds like. PS-2 sounds are digitally recorded sounds of real locomotives. There are more sounds than present on most Lionel RailSounds equipped locomotives with the possible exception of Lionel's newest version RS-5.0. Lionel's sounds still have a significant edge in quality over PS-2, particularly in the horn/whistle area. People involved with the RS system are musician/recording engineers.

If the sounds are extrememly important to you, I'd listen to the actual engine you are considering buying at a local shop/show/club before making a decision.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 2,877 posts
Posted by Bob Keller on Thursday, December 8, 2005 6:54 AM
Do you have the original ProtoSound or LocoSound (only LocoSound engines, not PS1 engines, came with speed control). LocoSound was an intentionally "basic" sound package for people who wanted sound on a budget.

Either way, the difference between original ProtoSound or LocoSound compared to PS2 is night and day. Sounds are better, more elaborate, reproduction is far richer than the original system.

Bob Keller

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
MTH railsound differences between proto and proto 2.0
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 8, 2005 12:09 AM
I have two MTH railking steam engines both with proto sound. Neither is a Proto 2.0 setup. Is there a difference in the "sound" of the chuffing in reguards to quality? I have one Lionel Steam engine with railsounds and the chuffing sound and whistle is far superiour to either of the MTH engines. I'm looking at getting another engine but with either the proto 2.0 or the Lionel with it's railsound 2.0 (assuming that's the latest lionel sound). One of my MTH engines has the speed control which I like very much but I'm not at all happy with the sound of the chuffing and the whistle and bell. It just sounds very poor compared to my Lionel engine. Any thoughts on the differences I would appreciate.
George

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month