Trains.com

V-8 Steam Engine

1467 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
V-8 Steam Engine
Posted by spankybird on Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:50 PM
Did you know that there was a V-8 Steam engine [?] [:0]







Check out the story

http://www.pernet.net/~james1/v-8/v-8steam.htm
tom

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Over the Rainbow!
  • 760 posts
Posted by eZAK on Wednesday, June 22, 2005 3:16 PM
"Verrr...rry IN...TER..resting"
Relax, Don't Worry, Have a Home Brew!</font id="size2"> Pat Zak</font id="size3">
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Holland
  • 1,404 posts
Posted by daan on Wednesday, June 22, 2005 4:44 PM
Looks like the other 4 cylinders are on the other 2 axles.. I doubt if this machine would ever run properly since it takes a whole lote of tempering to get all 8 cylinders matching in power. I guess it would have a big problem with steamconsumption since 8 cylinders and 8 pipes loose 8 times as much heat as 2 big cylinders..
But the machine looks incredible!
Daan. I'm Dutch, but only by country...
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 14 posts
Posted by Bluecometk on Wednesday, June 22, 2005 6:25 PM
That is a trick set up. With modern technology ,variable valve train geometries ,timing ,lift, this thing could be very efficient and powerful. Ok now lets all pool our money together and build it. Who's up for it?
Bluecometk.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:02 PM
This could cause many engine crews to shout in unison,Wow! I coulda' had a V8!
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Morgantown, WV
  • 1,459 posts
Posted by cheese3 on Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:25 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Bluecometk
Ok now lets all pool our money together and build it. Who's up for it?


I'm in as long as i get it on the first weekend of each month[:D]

Adam Thompson Model Railroading is fun!

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 9 posts
Posted by Planes and Trains on Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:49 PM
Now which company will make a scale model first....... Lionel, MTH, or ? It would be a neat engine to have on the set!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Thursday, June 23, 2005 8:51 AM
Notice that the engines are located on the first and third axles on the left side and the second and fourth on the right. So they are all four independent. But each of them should be as smooth as an automotive V8: The cylinders are double-acting, like conventional steam-locomotive cylinders, giving each cylinder four times as many power strokes as an automobile engine's.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:24 AM
Amazing. The end of the article says a Swiss firm is planing a model - I wonder what scale. I wonder what other experiments are out there.
Enjoy
paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:38 AM
Very interesting! You've gotta love that streamlined styling, too! It really is a shame how it met it's end, though. A technological experiment as unique as this should have been put in the Smithsonian instead of just being scrapped like yesterday's garbage.

QUOTE: Originally posted by IRONROOSTER

I wonder what other experiments are out there.


Check out this site: http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/locoloco.htm You'd be amazed at all the wierd, wild and wacky steam locomotives that people came up with!
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:41 AM
odd looking locomotive. Looks like an old Marx or something. Always wonder when new coal experiments will be conducted.

BTW, in today's news today, the entire Swiss rail line shut down b/c of power outage.

They had to bring out diesels.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:23 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Sask_Tinplater

Very interesting! You've gotta love that streamlined styling, too! It really is a shame how it met it's end, though. A technological experiment as unique as this should have been put in the Smithsonian instead of just being scrapped like yesterday's garbage.

QUOTE: Originally posted by IRONROOSTER

I wonder what other experiments are out there.


Check out this site: http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/locoloco.htm You'd be amazed at all the wierd, wild and wacky steam locomotives that people came up with!


Good site. Certainly were a lot unusual steam engines.
Thanks
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
  • 8,059 posts
Posted by cnw1995 on Thursday, June 23, 2005 12:19 PM
David, I just don't see the appeal of electrics. Metra's lines out of Chicago are like the outstretched fingers of a hand - the diesel powered lines at the top of the hand run by BNSF and UP rarely have motive problems (the MP36s haved had problems with fine snow - kind of like GG1s, forcing the few F40Cs left out of retirement but that's another story). The former IC Electric lines and the South Shore and South Bend have had immense line-closing problems with cantenary and power outages. This past winter, weather and derailments closed both lines several times - with no alternatives for commuters ...

Doug Murphy 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...' Henry V.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Thursday, June 23, 2005 1:34 PM
The energy is cheaper; so, when the traffic is dense enough that the cost of power distribution can be allocated across enough trains, they are cheaper to operate. They can operate in tunnels without concern for the exhaust gasses. And they can provide very high peak power for short periods of time, as on grades and when accelerating.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
  • 8,059 posts
Posted by cnw1995 on Friday, June 24, 2005 8:47 AM
So the infrastructure cost is set against its energy efficiency when running many trains. This makes sense. And I'll bet they don't keep up or rather keep up as best can with the catenary repairs and improvements. Of course, on the south side, it doesn't help when a derailing freight tears down the towers...

Doug Murphy 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...' Henry V.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: 15 mi east of Cleveland
  • 2,072 posts
Posted by 1688torpedo on Saturday, June 25, 2005 1:10 PM
Tom! Very interesting story ! Makes one wonder what else was developed and eventually got scrapped.
Keith Woodworth........Seat Belts save lives,Please drive safely.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month