rtraincollector Plate Rail I am obviously behind in all things Lionel since I've just become aware that nothing they offer these days is straight TMCC. So my previous comment about TMCC making LC+ redundant is not a fair comparison. Once TMCC is taken out of the equation I see why it makes sense that Lionel is offering LC+. It's sort of like TMCC lite. After scanning the current catalog it's apparent that the LionChief Plus offerings are relatively less expensive than their Legacy controlled counterparts. Compare the LC, NW2 at roughly $300 to the same sized Legacy equipped Alco S2 at $650. A substantial difference to be sure and makes the NW2 look like a real bargain. I suppose the LC+'s ability to be operated in conventional mode makes it somewhat compatible with TMCC or Legacy when using a TPC, so I'm almost sold on LC+. I do like that little Camelback too. Bruce I see where your coming from but my question since you want to compare apples to oranges in my mind what are the real differences. Legacy has lot more detail so I know your comparing a $300 engine to a $600+ engine but you need to compare equals and to be honest you can't between the 2 you can compare similarities and see which fits you best and which you can afford/like better but to compare a Legacy engine to a lionchief plus is not even in the same class. To me It just doesn't suit my needs If I had little children the chance of entertaining them then maybe but to me your trying to compare a Volkswagen beetle to a Cadillac.
Plate Rail I am obviously behind in all things Lionel since I've just become aware that nothing they offer these days is straight TMCC. So my previous comment about TMCC making LC+ redundant is not a fair comparison. Once TMCC is taken out of the equation I see why it makes sense that Lionel is offering LC+. It's sort of like TMCC lite. After scanning the current catalog it's apparent that the LionChief Plus offerings are relatively less expensive than their Legacy controlled counterparts. Compare the LC, NW2 at roughly $300 to the same sized Legacy equipped Alco S2 at $650. A substantial difference to be sure and makes the NW2 look like a real bargain. I suppose the LC+'s ability to be operated in conventional mode makes it somewhat compatible with TMCC or Legacy when using a TPC, so I'm almost sold on LC+. I do like that little Camelback too. Bruce
I am obviously behind in all things Lionel since I've just become aware that nothing they offer these days is straight TMCC. So my previous comment about TMCC making LC+ redundant is not a fair comparison. Once TMCC is taken out of the equation I see why it makes sense that Lionel is offering LC+. It's sort of like TMCC lite.
After scanning the current catalog it's apparent that the LionChief Plus offerings are relatively less expensive than their Legacy controlled counterparts. Compare the LC, NW2 at roughly $300 to the same sized Legacy equipped Alco S2 at $650. A substantial difference to be sure and makes the NW2 look like a real bargain.
I suppose the LC+'s ability to be operated in conventional mode makes it somewhat compatible with TMCC or Legacy when using a TPC, so I'm almost sold on LC+. I do like that little Camelback too.
Bruce
I see where your coming from but my question since you want to compare apples to oranges in my mind what are the real differences.
Legacy has lot more detail so I know your comparing a $300 engine to a $600+ engine but you need to compare equals and to be honest you can't between the 2 you can compare similarities and see which fits you best and which you can afford/like better but to compare a Legacy engine to a lionchief plus is not even in the same class. To me It just doesn't suit my needs If I had little children the chance of entertaining them then maybe but to me your trying to compare a Volkswagen beetle to a Cadillac.
I beg to differ there, RT. Look over both examples and you'll see both engines have only one motor, are pretty much exact scale and seem to have an equal amount of added detail. OK, the NW2 is a PW copy but there's probably no closer pair to compare with. The main, if not only difference being the mode of control...which is what the topic is all about.
Not trying to add any fuel, but I would thing an easy fix to running more than one of the same trains on a track could be resolved with a couple of dip switches. The ceiling fans in my train room are operated with a remote. (fairly common). You can have multiple fans in the same room and control each one of them seperately, just by changing the pattern on a dip switch. One in the fan, and one in the controller. Then if you have two grandkids they BOTH could have Thomas. And avoid a fight.
Don
Buckeye Riveter KRM and like SJ said how often do you run more than one train. Those forum members that have visited my layout have seen three to five trains run on a single track using TMCC. The key ingredient is the cruise control. Trains sometimes wait on my layout for a switch to clear in order to proceed. As Blueberry once said, "Buckeye really does run trains."
KRM and like SJ said how often do you run more than one train.
and like SJ said how often do you run more than one train.
Those forum members that have visited my layout have seen three to five trains run on a single track using TMCC. The key ingredient is the cruise control. Trains sometimes wait on my layout for a switch to clear in order to proceed. As Blueberry once said, "Buckeye really does run trains."
No argument here Buckeye, but,,,,,,,,,,, I choose to keep an open mind on the LionChief system with 6 grand-kids. Regardless what Blueberry or whoever once said. Not to say TMCC and the other big buck stuff does not have their good points but,,,,I got to deal with the what I have here. Six grand-kids.......Once I see LionChief I will let you know.
I think in the video they say you can run more than one train on the same track at the same time.
Heck who knows,,,maybe someday I will even try the big buck stuff but conventional still works for me. "Sit" at the transformer "really" run the trains. It is what ever you want to do,,,,,Right??????
Joined 1-21-2011 TCA 13-68614
Kev, From The North Bluff Above Marseilles IL.
Celebrating 18 years on the CTT Forum.
Buckeye Riveter......... OTTS Charter Member, a Roseyville Raider and a member of the CTT Forum since 2004..
Jelloway Creek, OH - ELV 1,100 - Home of the Baltimore, Ohio & Wabash RR
TCA 09-64284
RT,,,,,You must of done okay after the surgery, Good on that,
Did you watch the video link I posted in the start of the thread? It tells a lot of the reason and thought behind the LionChief system,
I ordered one and when and if it ever shows I will let you know what I think. Not worth the time till I have one in my hand, and like SJ said how often do you run more than one train. TMCC is history today and by design..Like cell phones and computers, wait 6 months and what you have is redundant. . I want to get the grand kids started,,,Hope this will be the ticket.
I have no idea if it can up-grade or not what alone that would cost. Good question though,
More to come.
How many trains do most of us run at one time with a remote? I don't see a problem with having separate ones for each engine type. As stated earlier these are good engines without the added expense of a TMCC/Legacy add- on.
"IT's GOOD TO BE THE KING",by Mel Brooks
Charter Member- Tardis Train Crew (TTC) - Detroit3railers- Detroit Historical society Glancy Modular trains- Charter member BTTS
I see where your coming from but my question since you want to compare apples to oranges in my mind what are the real differences
I can take a legecy or TMCC engine over to my friends place that has TMCC an run it with out worrying about bring the controller also
I don't need a different controller for each engine even if color coated it will be just to many after while if you go just this.
Can't run two of same engine together with out some problems from what I understand.
I understand where some this may be nice for and great for them. I don't have a problem with the product as long as they market it as what it should be as a beginner stage into command control but there should be some way with out it costing $150-$200 to upgrade to TMCC. Legacy I doubt you will see as from my understanding you as a individual can't get parts for legacy only authorized dealers can and can work on them.
With all said I may be wrong on some but this is how it has been explained to me.
Life's hard, even harder if your stupid John Wayne
http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/
I think my concern somehow has gotten turned inside out. My concern was what about the guy, who doesn't have any grandchildren, and would like to expand engine roster without spending $500 +. By sacrificing some of the detail and purchasing say a Lion Chief + engine. And IF it was possible to run it in a TMCC environment you wouldn't need ANOTHER handheld. Gosh, I would buy a Camelback too.
I guess I'm asking too much, not trying to take anything away from the little ones. And I'm REALLY happy that they are available as marketed as they have been. .
What will you do when you need a smart phone or pad to run your trains? It's coming faster than one thinks.
http://resources.bachmanntrains.com/ihobby2014/html5/index.html?page=1
I am the monster in your head...And I thought you'd learn by now, It seems you haven't yet.I am the venom in your skin --- Breaking Benjamin
I agree with Sir J. That's what is intriguing to me about the sets.
Doug, glad to hear that Thomas, Percy and James could all run at the same time with no frequency interference.
Doug Murphy 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...' Henry V.
Most has been said but buying a set with remote and nothing else to buy is a big winner for first time buyers. Not having TMCC keeps the cost down in set price and no remote system to buy.
How about giving us applied details and scale examples for basically the same price as these "entry level" toys for kids? Allow me to go digital if I choose. I think the affordable price of a TMCC hand held and base kinda makes these LC offerings redundant. What market there might be will probably be killed off when Bachmann Williams starts selling their I-phone gizmo.
Upon reviewing the video, and the comments. I can see where it has appeal to the entry level. I think it was an oversight to exclude TMCC compatibility. Especially when you consider the cost of ERR TMCC upgrade. However, I really doubt that it was a simple oversight, and must be an effort to protect the other products from a lower cost engine. Would have thought that with a TMCC compatibility the sales volume would be justifiable for the Lion Chief product lines. (Grandpa may have enjoyed running some of those engines when the kids aren't around. And, what happens if both grand kids want Thomas as opposed to one having to run Percy or Diesel. Just my opinion.)
dbaker48Can anyone shed some light on the application of Lion Chief & Lion Chief +, my primary concern is why are they not forward compatible to the TMCC or Legacy formats. I can see the need of having an entry level remote capability. But, wouldn't it be desirable that it be upgradable to the TMCC or Legacy? Secondly, why would you want specific controllers for each engine?
dbaker48 I can see a real quandary if someone wanted to buy a grandchild a system for Christmas, and be able to run it on Grandpa's layout.
I can see a real quandary if someone wanted to buy a grandchild a system for Christmas, and be able to run it on Grandpa's layout.
Don, The LionChief remote, basic or +, communicate directly with the loco. No "command base" type of electronics required. As long as "Granpa's" layout is three rail and is carrying sufficient power, operating with TMCC/Legacey/DCS, the Lionchief loco's will function just fine. Even operating at the same time as Gramps. The only problem might be if Gramps gets the same Lionchief set for multiple grandkids and they all show up to run on his layout at the same time.
Edit: Just saw Brent's post. If you plan on getting a second Thomas set you will run into operating issues since all of the Thomas engines use the same frequency. Maybe opt for a Percy or James instead.
Remember the Veterans. Past, present and future.
www.sd3r.org
Proud New Member Of The NRA
Don,Not everyone wants to 'upgrade' to Legacy. I plan on buying another of the Thomas sets (have Thomas for Christina) for Matthew and then building them a small layout for just their use. I won't put them on the same track, nor have switches to 'join' the two loops. I am planning to add a few animated accessories though.I see it as a way to get them interested in trains. Christina absolutely LOVES her Thomas set and has been hammering to play with it.At some point I may buy them each their own engine to run on the main layout, but that won't be for at least 5 years.
https://brentsandsusanspicutures.shutterfly.com/
I agree with you , Bob. My statement was based on the premise that a certain engine or road name was available only in LionChief, and that price is no object to get an engine converted to operate on the TMCC/Legacy systems.
Larry
Larry, while many things are possible, I have not heard of anyone who has converted one to TMCC. I'm not sue that the cost of the components and installation would not be more than the locomotive. If someone on the forum has done this, I'd like them to post their comments on how it was achieved (ease/cost/time).
Bob Keller
The LionChief series of trains are designed to be an inexpensive introduction into remotely controlled trains. As such, they are made as simple as possible, and yet retain some of the features of the more expensive and sophisticated trains. To engineer the LionChief trains to be upgradeable to Legacy would be possible if chassis wiring, plugs and sockets were standardized for both remote systems. The use of different remotes for every train is a cost saving measure also. To be able to assign different frequencies to different trains using only one remote would add complexity and cost. In the end, these simple systems are no different than the simple 3 or 4 channel remote systems that entry level RC planes have. If you want the 8 or 10 channel planes, you get the requisite remote system. It is understood and accepted that the starter system remotes will be replaced when you step up into a more sophisticated model.
If you like a locomotive that is only available in LionChief, I am sure that they can be upgraded to the latest technology to run on the TMCC and Legacy systems.
Don, This video should help. I checked this out before I pulled the trigger on the Dinosaur set I ordered for the grandson last week.
It answered a lot of the questions I had. The set is not to be delivered till early December if I am so lucky so I can't tell you anymore at this time.
Cut and paste this link to see the Lionel Video.
http://www.legacystation.com/lionel-lionchief-remote-control-set-instructional-video
100% agree
Thats why I will not buy
Can anyone shed some light on the application of Lion Chief & Lion Chief +, my primary concern is why are they not forward compatible to the TMCC or Legacy formats. I can see the need of having an entry level remote capability. But, wouldn't it be desirable that it be upgradable to the TMCC or Legacy? Secondly, why would you want specific controllers for each engine?
Another factor especially with the Lion Chief +, if I saw an engine or road name I liked, I would opt out just because of having to add another control system, and remote.
Don't understand ??!!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month