Trains.com

O Scale layout

8376 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 5 posts
O Scale layout
Posted by COTrainFan on Friday, October 3, 2014 5:19 PM

Hi all. I am getting ready to dive into model trains as a hobby, something I have always wanted to do. My goal is to build a C & O model with a Allegheny 2-6-6-6 as well as some other late model C & O steam engines. Any and all feedback is welcome. My main questions are what would be the minimum recommendation for area and if if a 16' x 12' foot area would be sufficient. Also any input on favored manufacture or retailers to acquire trains and modelling items. Thanks in advance.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Parma Heights Ohio
  • 3,442 posts
Posted by Penny Trains on Friday, October 3, 2014 7:02 PM

Welcome aboard!  Big Smile

With an engine that size, curvature will be your biggest issue.  Most O scale articulateds need O72 minimum.  Of course, the larger the turning radius, the more realistic your trains will look.    So it's not all bad.  An O72 curve will take up a 6 foot circle for starters.  O84 would probably look better and minimize the possibility of the pilot sideswiping cars, signals, structures, etc. as it articulates.  16 by 12 will be enough to give you a running track for an allegheny but few sidings it could negotiate.

However, 16 by 12 is more than enough real estate to build a decent O gauge layout using O31 curves.  If you limit the allegheny to a dedicated running track, you could use all manner of smaller engines to service industries, yards, etc. inside that giant oval.  Then you swing the cars up onto the main for the big power to pick up.  Also, you could use drawbridges, lift out bridges or just duck-under to access the inner lines.  Make a donut with arms inside the hole.  Sort of like an underlined M.

Becky

Trains, trains, wonderful trains.  The more you get, the more you toot!  Big Smile

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Posted by rtraincollector on Friday, October 3, 2014 8:40 PM

Go on with what Becky has saying the main question is what type of track are you planning to use there is plenty different type out there. the original O, O-27, Fastrack , MTH Realtrack , Gargraves (which I like) and others. 

I know most do a O-72 and I think some do a O-84 but gargraves does O-72, O-80,O-96,O-106,O-113,O-120, O-128 and even O-138 which would fit in your 12 foot wide area for your articulated steam engine. I have a 8' x 16' layout and I use O-72 on my outside loop. befor you decide on a track though I would also look at things like switches and try and figure how much track you will need. I personnally do not care for Lionel Fastrack or MTH Realtrack as both have a hollow base and can add to the noise you will already have. Lots to think about before moving forward installing insulation under track so it doesn't make so much noise, I'm sure you probably thought of all this or most of it but just giving you some things to think about. 

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Friday, October 3, 2014 9:31 PM

Good advice from Becky and rrtraincollector.  All I can add is buy the best you can afford, it's hard to go wrong that way.

And as far as building a layout, just do it.  It takes on a life of it's own.  I'd also say get the trains up and running as soon as you can, you'll feel better about it.  The scenicking and other fill-ins can come later.  You see, in my mind, the layout is the stage and the trains are the actors.  Good actors can give a great performance on a bare stage, but a fully dressed stage is nothing without the actors.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Friday, October 3, 2014 10:03 PM
Hi COTrainfan, I'm glad that you at least came here, that other forum that I mentioned would also be a wealth of good info for you as well. 12x16 I can only DREAM about having that much room for a permanent layout, you can do a lot in that space. Those HO guys in the MR, gen discus forum tried to convince you of how little is available in "O" well here is some for you to think about. Lionel. 6-38081 JLC 2-6-6-6 Top of the line Special Edition Scale size TMCC. 6-28011 2-6-6-6 Scale size TMCC. I thought that Lionel also offered the Allegheny in the Semi-scale "Lionmaster" line, but I couldn't find it, so I may be wrong about this one. MTH. Scale size 2-6-6-6. 20-3504-1 PS3 shpd 7/14. 20-3505-1 PS3 Shpd 7/14. 20-3115-1 PS2. 20-3017 Conventional control 1996, 1 dealer shows available. Semi-scale size. 30-1612-1 Imperial version schld deliv 11/14. 30-1504-1 Imperial version. 30-1505-1 Imperial Version. 30-1218-1 PS2. 30-1116-0. 30-1116-1. Just to give you an Idea of other locomotives available in C&O "O" gauge , these are all Lionel, I didn't feel like spending the rest of the night researching MTH as well, but they should also have an Excellent selection of C&O Steam locomotives. 6-11400 H-7 2-8-8-2 Scale size, Legacy control/features. 6-38058 H-7 2-8-8-2 JLC version TMCC. 6-11299 2-6-6-2 Scale/Legacy. 6-11321 2-6-6-2 Scale/Legacy. 6-28075 2-6-6-2 Scale/TMCC. 6-11303 2-10-4 Scale/Legacy. 6-11304 2-10-4 Scale/Legacy. 6-28079 2-10-4 Scale/TMCC. 6-11452 2-8-4 Scale/Legacy. 6-38076 2-8-4 Scale/TMCC. 6-11255 2-8-2 Scale/Legacy. 6-11108 4-6-2 "The George Washington" Scale/TMCC. 6-11128 4-6-2 Scale/TMCC. 6-11156 4-6-0 Scale/Legacy. 6-28081 0-8-0 Scale/TMCC. 6-11109 0-8-0 Scale/Conventional. 6-28674 0-6-0T Scale/Conv. Lionel also offered a scale size Stream-Lined 4-6-4 "Yellow Belly", but I couldn't find the # to quote. I have the Union Pacific version of the JLC H-7 2-8-8-2, it is an Absolutely Beautiful locomotive, it is tied with Lionels Southern Pacific AC-9 as my FAVORITE locomotive in my collection. The H-7 is another that you should look at, it just might sway you away from the H-8 Allegheny. I Hope that this gives you a bit more to think about, when you decide between "The King of Scales" ("O") and "Horribly Ordinary" (HO), whichever scale you choose, I HOPE that you Enjoy the Hobby of Model Railroading. BTW, I think that you confused them over at the MR Gen Discussion form, when you said that you wanted to build a "Model Set". The table,track and scenery are typically referred to as a "Layout". I think that many were thinking you meant you wanted to "Build" the model locomotive. Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Friday, October 3, 2014 10:16 PM
I am SORRY about the MESS that my above post appears, I TRIED to organize it, breaking paragraphs, and double spacing the lists. For whatever reason, sometimes the forum compresses all text into one UGLY, Difficult to read paragraph. If someone knows what I can do differently to avoid this issue, I would be Extremely Grateful, Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    July 2014
  • 184 posts
Posted by Plate Rail on Saturday, October 4, 2014 12:00 AM

Welcome to the forum, CO.  What has already been said is good advice.   I'd like to add a few details pertaining to layout design. 

  The noisy aspect of track with integral roadbed is a valid annoyance.  It might seem a minor issue now but just wait until you're up and running trains.  The sophisticated sound systems these new engines have can only be fully appreciated when running is quiet.  Even solid rail and insulated roadbed can set up more noise than one would like so planning everything you can to keep things quiet pays off later.

The unrealistic look of large engines negotiating curves is a personal pet peeve of mine.  As mentioned before you'll  be needing large turning circles anyway for articulated engines but designing for maximum size curves at the expense of maximum trackage is probably a prudent way to go.  Large numbered switches helps with smooth operation too.  Integrating smaller spurs that utilize tighter radius switches where only switchers live can fill open real estate along side your mainlines. 

If at all possible, plan to have your minimum sized curves within mountains or behind scenery so that the awkward look of articulated engine overhang is hidden. Ideally, use easements into curves so that the transition into the turns can be taken at speed gracefully.   The sweeping aspect of a parabolic curve is far more realistic than a strict radius.

If I've read you correctly in the type of layout you're planning then hopefully some of these hints help.  Also, if you do follow some of my suggestions then using Atlas of Gar Graves flexible track  will go a long way in fascilitating those goals.

Bruce

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:34 PM

I have a different point of view about running big trains.  I enjoy the challenge of operating stuff on O27 that was never meant to be there.  I have adapted a Rail King Big Boy, a 773 Hudson, Superliners, 15-inch 2500-type cars, 16-wheel flatcars, and a Trainmaster to O27.  An around-the-walls layout tends to lessen the visual effect of the overhang, as you generally see the trains from the inside of the curves.  I also use spiral curves, as mentioned above.  In addition to giving the illusion that the curves are gentler than they really are, they let you put track closer to the wall by easing the big models away from the layout edge before they encounter the sharpest part of the curve.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Parma Heights Ohio
  • 3,442 posts
Posted by Penny Trains on Saturday, October 4, 2014 7:24 PM

Challenger, try using the "Ordered" or "Unordered" list functions.  They should override any condensing and compressing the program does automatically.

Becky

Trains, trains, wonderful trains.  The more you get, the more you toot!  Big Smile

  • Member since
    February 2014
  • 77 posts
Posted by Rob412 on Monday, October 6, 2014 7:54 AM
Hi CO
One thing I would check is what control system you prefer (if not conventional). While lionel uses Legacy control MTH uses PS3 which are not compatible. You don't want to install a lionel control system only to find out your new MTH engines don't work with it. If you run conventional you can run both but you wouldn't have all the bells and whistles (literally). I would see which mfg has the most of what your looking for and start out with them. You could always add the other control system later if you choose.
  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 993 posts
Posted by lion88roar on Monday, October 6, 2014 8:39 AM

Try to clear up a bit of mis-information here.

1. You CAN control a PS2/PS3 MTH engine with a Legacy Controller - you will NOT get the 'full PS3 experience' as you would if you had the MTH DCS components and controller. You CAN control a Lionel TMCC or Legacy engine using the MTC DCS system, you just won't get the 'full Legacy experience'. You CAN have both MTH DCS and Lionel Legacy systems connected to the same layout.

2. Track Noise - we've been through this a 1,000,000 times on this forum. Track noise depends on a myriad of items. What is used for the subroad base? Are you using ceiling tiles or sound stop or another form of sound deadening material under your track? Do NOT screw the track to the plywood under layment - secure it to the ceiling tile, sound stop, foam board, etc. The screws transfer the vibration to the plywood which acts like a drum. Is your rolling stock hollow? Covered Hoppers and open well boxcars will result in louder road noise than hoppers or boxcars filled with batting (filler used for making fluffy pillows), or passenger cars. It is actually the rolling stock that is responsible for the greatest volume regarding track noise.

If you are planning on running the Legacy Control System (LCS), FasTrack is the BEST track system to use. It will allow you to get up and running quickly and the new switches come with LCS built-in making very easy to add them to the control system.

https://brentsandsusanspicutures.shutterfly.com/

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Monday, October 6, 2014 10:20 PM

Everyone has their opinions, and it is important that opinion being identified as that and not fact, especially for the benefit of the inexperienced.

I sure do not want to overwhelm anyone and try to make the basic question more difficult than it needs be.  But I have to add....

Before you start cutting wood I would suggest making a simple list of "Goals".  What would you like your layout to do.  I suggest listing everything you can think of, then start making choices and prioritize.  For example for some of us, not having a "duck under" can be critical.  Or, wanting to reverse directions of trains.  Running multiple trains at the same time, in opposite directions.  What is the minimum radius your existing equipment requires.  What time of operation you want back and forth, continuous, etc.

The most intense and biggest arguments that occur is based upon MTH or Lionel.  And is justifiably so!  In my OPINION I prefer MTH.  That being said I have MTH, DCS, Lionel TMCC and Legacy.  The majority of my time is with DCS, because I like all the features it offers.  (My layout is powered by Lionel Xfmrs however).  The best thing you can do is to go to a hobby store and try to compare apples to apples.  Train sets of similar prices.

Regarding compatibility

If you want to run Conventional Mode, they are all compatible.  Just get some track, a transformer, and go.

Now if you want to take advantage of the command control capabilities more caution needs to be executed.

MTH DCS will work with MTH PS2 and PS3 equipped engines.  IT WILL NOT WORK WITH MTH PS1.  The DCS system WILL operate Lionels TMCC and Legacy engines.  The features that DCS wil NOT control are a relatively few.  (Scrolling Whistle, Vibrating Hand Remote, and maybe a few others that I can't think of)  The DCS will control all accessories and switch operations.  Regardless of manufacturers.  Both MTH and Lionel have control units that have to be bought to control the switches and accessories.  (MTH's AIU $89-99, controls 10 acc and 10 switches.  Lionel's SCC $99-119, controls 4 acc and 4 switches, OR 6 switches.

 Lionel TMCC or Legacy, will not CONTROL MTH engines, (other than in conventional mode, NO command control what so ever.

Track - Fastrack is very popular.  However, try looking at Gargraves or Ross.  Ross offers a very large assortment of switchtes and (Opinion) are more realistic looking and less expensive.  The additional switch assortment is very beneficial in smaller areas especially the 11 degree.  Ross can be hooked up to Legacy or DCS control very easy.

Equipment - OPINION  I have some of the "top of the line" MTH and Lionel engines, I feel the "bang for the buck" is better with MTH.  AGAIN OPINION !!!   (I have a MTH Rail King Big Boy PS2, and a Lionel Scale Big Boy Legacy.            $1,000 difference in price.

You are setting out on a great adventure, you CAN'T go wrong !  AND YOUR opinion is the one that matters.  ENJOY !!!!!
"

Don

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • 15 posts
Posted by fyrefyter on Friday, October 10, 2014 2:56 PM

I would like to recommend using Atlas track for realistic appearance, Gargraves is also a great track to use with Ross switches. Don't cram too many accessories into your layout,leave spaces for sidings and scenery. Ebay is a great place to buy track for your layout. Mike

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Saturday, October 11, 2014 1:38 AM

The track layout needs to be located on benchwork and/or modules placed around the wall.

 

The outside curve sections can be O-84. The inside curve sections can be O-72.

 

All of the switches should be O-72. A few spurs and sidings can be placed along the straight tracks.

 

 

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Saturday, October 11, 2014 1:42 AM

A Lionel TMCC Base with a Track Power Controller/TPC electronics module will allow you control Proto.Sounds locomotives from MTH in conventional mode, as a basic command control feature.

 

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Lake Worth FL
  • 4,014 posts
Posted by phillyreading on Sunday, October 12, 2014 3:51 PM
The only thing about ebay is that you must be familiar with the track you want to buy. I had a friend buy some track from an ebay seller and he got a mixture of track; a couple pieces of Lionel Fastrack, some 031 track and some old Marx track. A better place to buy is on the O Gauge Railroad forum under the for sale listings, it's free to use.
Interested in southest Pennsylvania railroads; Reading & Northern, Reading Company, Reading Lines, Philadelphia & Reading.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Monday, October 13, 2014 11:15 AM

Andrew Falconer

A Lionel TMCC Base with a Track Power Controller/TPC electronics module will allow you control Proto.Sounds locomotives from MTH in conventional mode, as a basic command control feature.

 

I am certain you can run MTH in conventional mode without a TMCC Base and TPC unit.  All you need is a transformer.  (What we do at Christmas around the tree.)

Don

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Posted by rtraincollector on Monday, October 13, 2014 1:04 PM

Me if they don't show pics of every thing I don't buy but Marx curves where O31 anyway and suggesting O guage railroad forum could be considered advertising for them personally I don't like that forum to snobby for me. and I normally didn't post just read so it wasn't aimed at me. 

I find Ebay 95% or better a decent deal

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Jelloway Creek, OH - Elv. 1100
  • 7,578 posts
Posted by Buckeye Riveter on Monday, October 13, 2014 1:17 PM

Back to that noise issue.............I use rubber ballast from Scenic Express and it really cuts the noise.  Zzz

Celebrating 18 years on the CTT Forum. Smile, Wink & Grin

Buckeye Riveter......... OTTS Charter Member, a Roseyville Raider and a member of the CTT Forum since 2004..

Jelloway Creek, OH - ELV 1,100 - Home of the Baltimore, Ohio & Wabash RR

TCA 09-64284

KRM
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: North Bluff above Marseilles IL
  • 6,506 posts
Posted by KRM on Monday, October 13, 2014 1:19 PM

RT, I have some Marx track and it is O27 and O34 what they called wide radius but it is all at O27 profile. I have one half curve of the O34 on my layout. Did Marx make O profile O31 too??? Huh?  If so I have never seen that not to say they did not make something I have not seen.

Joined 1-21-2011    TCA 13-68614

Kev, From The North Bluff Above Marseilles IL. Whistling

 

KRM
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: North Bluff above Marseilles IL
  • 6,506 posts
Posted by KRM on Monday, October 13, 2014 1:21 PM

Buckeye Riveter

Back to that noise issue.............I use rubber ballast from Scenic Express and it really cuts the noise.  Zzz

Buckeye do you have part numbers for that? do you have to cut it to size for the different radius curves?

Joined 1-21-2011    TCA 13-68614

Kev, From The North Bluff Above Marseilles IL. Whistling

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Posted by rtraincollector on Monday, October 13, 2014 3:38 PM

Kevin your probably right I probably had a brain melt down and was thinking of some other brand but still bottom line their is a lot of great track at very good deals on EBay  if you look 

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

KRM
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: North Bluff above Marseilles IL
  • 6,506 posts
Posted by KRM on Monday, October 13, 2014 3:44 PM

I was just asking RT, I have never seen anything but what I posted as far as Marx track but I don't know the whole history of this stuff.  And your right I have got some very good deals on the bay for track but like they say you got to know what your looking at. Wink

Joined 1-21-2011    TCA 13-68614

Kev, From The North Bluff Above Marseilles IL. Whistling

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month