Trains.com

Railscope or not?

929 views
2 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: West coast, USA
  • 356 posts
Posted by rlplionel on Friday, December 13, 2013 4:55 PM

I've used the same Railscope locomotive on my layout for the past 15+ years, and my overall experience with it has been positive. The picture is transmitted to a small black and white television near the transformer control, so I can easily view the train's progress along the track. The picture is fairly clear, with some squiggly lines showing up if I run the engine too fast.

To power the camera I use a 9VBRTV, obtained from Dallee Electronics, instead of batteries. The only drawback to using the 9VBRTV is that the picture fades within a few seconds of turning off track power.

Robert

http://robertstrains.com/

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,233 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 1:44 PM

On simple layouts, it works as intended.  BUT, it is B&W w/o sound, and unless you use one of the several work-arounds, the camera/transmitter has a voracious appetite for the rather expensive 9v batteries.

The technology has come a LONG way...  check out ChooChooCam.

Rob

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: St. Paul, Minnesota
  • 2,116 posts
Railscope or not?
Posted by Boyd on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 1:12 PM

I think they came out in 1989. If you have had a Lionel Railscope engine what has your experience been using one? I have read that you can buy and mount your own Color live video system, but where would a person buy that equipment?

Modeling the "Fargo Area Rapid Transit" in O scale 3 rail.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month