Trains.com

Smoke Pellets or Smoke Fluid?

4379 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 7 posts
Posted by kgkane78 on Monday, October 22, 2012 12:34 PM

Thanks everyone for the feedback.  Sounds like fluid should work fine (and be easier to get ahold of), unless someone has a strong preference for the pellets.

This was helpful!  So thanks again for all the info.

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Virginia
  • 544 posts
Posted by TRAINCAT on Sunday, October 21, 2012 4:28 PM

Smoke fluid won't leave that thick white gunk in your smoke unit that eventually has to be dug out. I use Mega steam in all my engines now. You don't need that conversion unit.

Roger

  • Member since
    April 2010
  • From: Detroit, MI
  • 301 posts
Posted by SantaFe158 on Monday, October 15, 2012 8:13 PM

I use fluid most of the time in my postwar steamers.  Seems to work better for me.  I also use pellets for fun occasionally, but fluid is cheaper to burn.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Orig: Tyler Texas. Lived in seven countries, now live in Sundown, Louisiana
  • 25,640 posts
Posted by jeffrey-wimberly on Monday, October 15, 2012 5:46 PM

My brother in law prefers the smoke pellets for his old Lionel steamer. I think it's a 2-6-2. He brings it out once in a blue moon.

Running Bear, Sundown, Louisiana
          Joined June, 2004

Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running Bear
Space Mouse for president!
15 year veteran fire fighter
Collector of Apple //e's
Running Bear Enterprises
History Channel Club life member.
beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam


  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 1,786 posts
Posted by cwburfle on Monday, October 15, 2012 4:21 PM

Its all a matter of personal preference.
I prefer the pellets because I'd rather put a small amount of dust into the air of my train room, as opposed to a small amount of oil.  Plus, I prefer the ordor of the pellets.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 15, 2012 3:24 PM

There won't be any residue with fluid.  I actually prefer fluid over pellets.  Don't waste the time or money on the liquid conversion kit.

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 7 posts
Smoke Pellets or Smoke Fluid?
Posted by kgkane78 on Monday, October 15, 2012 3:18 PM

Hi all...  I recently got a nice Lionel 2037 engine and whistling tender on eBay.  The seller had the engine professionally repainted, so the engine is in great condition.  It has a smoke unit that the seller said is in working order, but I haven't tested it just yet because I am still trying to figure out what material to use.

From my research, it looks like this engine originally used the smoke pellets, which I know I can still get from the companies that reproduce them.  However, I have seen some other engines that have what looks like dried smoke pellet material all over the smoke stack, which seems to be pretty common if the pellet is not 100% consumed while running the train.  In my research, I also discovered that I can use smoke fluid instead either in the original smoke unit or by converting the unit to liquid with one of Lionel's kits.

Will I end up with the same kind of residue on my engine if I use smoke fluid or is the fluid an ultimately cleaner option than the pellets?

-K

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month