Trains.com

Union Pacific 2-8-4s and 4-6-4s

1803 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 306 posts
Union Pacific 2-8-4s and 4-6-4s
Posted by SPer on Monday, May 21, 2012 12:45 PM

I looked at photos of Lionel Union Pacific Berkshires and Hudsons. Did UP owned Hudsons and Berkshires in real life

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, May 21, 2012 4:47 PM

U.P. didn't own any Berkshires or Hudsons. California neighbor Santa Fe did have some Hudsons, which pulled Budd streamlined cars like the 1950's Lionel train set I recall from the 1957 catalogue.

Stix
  • Member since
    March 2012
  • From: San Diego
  • 247 posts
Posted by overlandflyer on Tuesday, May 22, 2012 12:00 AM

wjstix

.... California neighbor Santa Fe did have some Hudsons, ...

Santa Fe was also the only western railroad to purchase new Berkshire-type locomotives.  in 1927, 15 Baldwin built 2-8-4's became Santa Fe Class 4101.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:58 AM

overlandflyer

 wjstix:

.... California neighbor Santa Fe did have some Hudsons, ...

 

Santa Fe was also the only western railroad to purchase new Berkshire-type locomotives.  in 1927, 15 Baldwin built 2-8-4's became Santa Fe Class 4101.

.....and so, the question is, why not?

Why didn't the western railroads purchase Berkshires or Baldwins?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,207 posts
Posted by stebbycentral on Wednesday, June 6, 2012 7:11 PM

Though the UP may not have had Hudson's, connecting line the Chicago & Northwestern did.  The E-4 class Hudson was a streamlined locomotive assigned to passenger service between Chicago and Omaha.

At one time a model of this locomotive was available from MTH.  Some proably still show up on auction sites.

I have figured out what is wrong with my brain!  On the left side nothing works right, and on the right side there is nothing left!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 1,340 posts
Posted by Seayakbill on Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:25 AM

Why didn't the western railroads purchase Berkshires or Baldwins?

Rich

 

The Northern's and big articulated's were the locomotives of choice for the major Western RR's to climb the Cascades and Rockies. The Union Pacific, Northern Pacific, Southern Pacific, Great Northern and the Spokane Portland & Seattle all had a wide assortment of articulated steamers.

Bill T.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, June 7, 2012 3:00 PM

Also, by the time the 2-8-4 came along, ATSF already had quite a few "Santa Fe" type 2-10-2 engines. Later when they needed more power, they went for larger engines like 2-10-4 "Texas" types.

Stix
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Thursday, June 14, 2012 11:36 PM

The UP did not have any Berkshires(or Hudsons). The SP did have ten Berks, bought from the Boston & Maine. So at least a few Berks did make it out West.

Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month