Trains.com

2332 GG1 height

1114 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • 35 posts
Posted by Konga Man on Monday, January 23, 2012 3:22 AM

lionelsoni

It doesn't look right for a running locomotive to have both pantographs down.  But a raised pantograph is also unrealistically high and may snag on something on your layout, like a 313 bascule bridge.  You might want to snub your pantograph at a realistic-looking intermediate height as I did, with a little piece of wire.

Good points; I appreciate the insight.

BTW, I also liked your archived tip about wiring the lights to the brushes.  I'd forgotten all about that one.Thumbs Up

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Sunday, January 22, 2012 4:24 PM

It doesn't look right for a running locomotive to have both pantographs down.  But a raised pantograph is also unrealistically high and may snag on something on your layout, like a 313 bascule bridge.  You might want to snub your pantograph at a realistic-looking intermediate height as I did, with a little piece of wire.

By the way, under ordinary circumstances, the PRR's practice was to run with the rear pantograph up.  That way, if that pantograph crashed, the front one was sure to be out of the way, undamaged, and available as a spare.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    January 2011
  • 35 posts
Posted by Konga Man on Sunday, January 22, 2012 9:08 AM

bfskinner
I get:

Lowered: 4 inches

Raised: 5  1/2 inches

In the raised posirtion I tilted the "wiper" so as to reach an overall maximum possible height.

I hope others will reply as I wouldn't risk my loco on these measurements, even though I tried my best.. To put it another way, I'd would certainly allow a full 6 inches clearance above the rails.

Not to worry.  I'll put a little Crisco on the bottom of the bridge. Stick out tongue

Thanks for the help.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 928 posts
Posted by bfskinner on Sunday, January 22, 2012 8:41 AM

I get:

Lowered: 4 inches

Raised: 5  1/2 inches

In the raised posirtion I tilted the "wiper" so as to reach an overall maximum possible height.

I hope others will reply as I wouldn't risk my loco on these measurements, even though I tried my best.. To put it another way, I'd would certainly allow a full 6 inches clearance above the rails.

 

 

 

 

bf
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • 35 posts
2332 GG1 height
Posted by Konga Man on Sunday, January 22, 2012 3:54 AM

I'm adding an upper level to a layout which will (at times) be running a 2332 on the lower level.  Can anyone tell me the height of the 2332 from top of the rail to the top of a) a lowered and b) an extended pantograph?  I'd measure mine but it's not here. ;)

Thanks.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month