Trains.com

What could you not "Live without"? Tmcc. sound, smoke, other?

2280 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
What could you not "Live without"? Tmcc. sound, smoke, other?
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 10:08 AM
FOr me, it is the sound that got me hooked again, and i would do anything to keep that. I rarly run smoke, and i could live without tmcc if i had to. But sound, nope, have to have it. How about you? WHat is your "Must Have"?
Bill
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 10:15 AM
I would say DCS. I know it is not in your subject line, but if DCS were not available, it would have been TMCC, I have both (I'm a techno-freak, reason for going with the latest craze, DCS).

Secondly would be sound. For my second engine purchase, it was a 3 rail with horn from MTH. Bought new, kept it about a week, and peddled it on Ebay. It was fine for what it was, but since my first engine was command control with all the bells and whistles, it just didn't float my boat, nor that of my boys.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Fremont, CA, USA
  • 213 posts
Posted by macdannyk1 on Monday, June 14, 2004 11:17 AM
Motors. And wheels. Lights are nice. Reverse unit. Couplers.
Everything else is luxury (smoke, electrocouplers, command control, etc.)
[:D]
Dan Member and Webmaster, Golden State TTOS
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
  • 8,059 posts
Posted by cnw1995 on Monday, June 14, 2004 11:22 AM
Well, I just have a train (with a headlight), transformer and track - no prototypical sound, little smoke, no command system, nothing really scale. I guess I could not live without the smell of ozone and that classic 'electrical train' roar of the train on the track.

Doug Murphy 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...' Henry V.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Frankfort, Kentucky
  • 1,758 posts
Posted by ben10ben on Monday, June 14, 2004 11:26 AM
For me, it's the smoke. I love the smell of it, whether coming from pellets or liquid.

During periods of train inactivity, I often find myself putting a strech of track above my desk, and running a diesel with a fan-driven smoke unit just for the smoke.
Ben TCA 09-63474
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 12:22 PM
I love the smoke too. DCS is for the birds.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, June 14, 2004 12:31 PM
TMCC and remote couplers, the rest is meaningless.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 1:02 PM
Ditto, what Rod said!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 1:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Big_Boy_4005

TMCC and remote couplers, the rest is meaningless.


Elliot, I can get my couplers to UNcouple, but how do you get them to COUPLE?

For me it's sound---even if the sound isn't "in scale." See my other thread[:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 1:13 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Sandy Jorgenson

I love the smoke too. DCS is for the birds.


I don't understand DCS, so I went with TMCC. I BARELY understand that.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Boca Raton, FL
  • 406 posts
Posted by willpick on Monday, June 14, 2004 1:21 PM
Sound would be #1. command control(DCS, TMCC, DCC-take your pick) #2. Smoke(in diesels[V]) #3. All the rest are not that necessary(for me at least[:)]) of course, these are the addons, not the basic equipment![:D][:D]






















A Day Without Trains is a Day Wasted

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Posted by FJ and G on Monday, June 14, 2004 1:25 PM
nice topic. I gave this a lot of thought and for me, it would have to be running the trains at slow speeds, esp. starts and stops, either thru DCS or the newer engines which are able to crawl slower than the PW models.

why?

Three reasons.

1. Makes the layout appear much larger if it takes longer
2. Fast speeds make me dizzy and puke
3. I enjoy switching moves and a jackrabbit locomotive doesn't handle well with switching

dav
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 3:15 PM
of course (quite simply)... my trains
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Holland
  • 1,404 posts
Posted by daan on Monday, June 14, 2004 3:24 PM
Besides the trains I can do without the multiple train thing. I also am addicted to the smoke-smell, and would love to have sound[:P][:P] (which I havn't yet).
I had my h0 engines running with an early multiple train system, which allowed 5 engines, but I had collisions all the time because my eyes normally only can see one direction at a time..
I also appriciate slow speeds and found that the old ac motors usually are capable of running smooth at low speeds..
Daan. I'm Dutch, but only by country...
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Yukon OK
  • 385 posts
Posted by okiechoochoo on Monday, June 14, 2004 5:24 PM
Smoke, since I run only postwar I don't care about all this high tech garbage

All Lionel all the time.

Okiechoochoo

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Sahuarita, AZ
  • 76 posts
Posted by phatkat64 on Monday, June 14, 2004 5:50 PM
Fan driven smoke units.

Fill my room with train smoke!!!!![:D]

Carmine, CEO, CE, and Chief Bottle Washer - the Pacific Belt RR, in HO scale

Founded by myself, 1975!

How are we going to get new recruits, when we ourselves are being priced out of the hobby!! Take your trains out of the box and play with them! That's why they were made! 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 16, 2004 10:18 AM
In order of importance to me:
(1) the head light with the (2)smoke behind it, the (3)whistler, and then the (4)noise from all the wheels.
Angelo
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 16, 2004 1:08 PM
I could be happy with just Postwar Lionel; the sounds, the smell, and all the action.

But for modern trains, I like the sounds the most. I don't care about the rest. Even then, I don't care to hear electronic sounds all the time.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month