Trains.com

Lionel Railscope

8489 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2018
  • 1 posts
Posted by bnsf11 on Saturday, May 26, 2018 12:53 PM

lionel just relesed a cabbose with cameras in there 2018 cataloge 

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, June 7, 2004 6:13 AM
Book says the thing is worth $250, but I'm not sure that too many people would be willing to pay that much. I wouldn't these days, but back when they were new and all the rage I did. As I recall, the process of "tuning" the track was a real pain, and even then the picture was often fuzzy.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Frankfort, Kentucky
  • 1,758 posts
Posted by ben10ben on Sunday, June 6, 2004 10:20 PM
Robert,
Thanks for the info on TMCC. I have been considering buying a Railscope engine, and have been concerned about this very thing.

I know that my command base is almost always plugged into the same circuit as my T.V., and usually sitting within a foot of the cable line. If I have my T.V. on when I turn on the command base, there is a slight drop in T.V. reception. I understand that the same thing happens if you are listening to an A.M. radio and running TMCC. I would also guess that the effect would be more pronounced if the signal were travelling through the same lines as the T.V. signal, and not just in close vicinity to it.
Ben TCA 09-63474
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: West coast, USA
  • 356 posts
Posted by rlplionel on Sunday, June 6, 2004 10:05 PM
Here's a picture of my Railscope locomotive:

http://home.surewest.net/rlplionel/Photo15.htm

The red boxcar behind the locomotive carries a battery pack that holds 6 AA alkaline batteries that power the Railscope camera. The two wires running out the top of the boxcar lead to the camera hook up beneath the locomotive. I've found the key to getting a clear Railscope picture is to keep the track clean. Dirty track causes "squiggles" in the TV picture, making it hard on the eyes to look at. And Big Boy is correct, TMCC messes up the Railscope picture. I run my Railscope locomotive on a dedicated non-TMCC loop of track.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
Posted by spankybird on Sunday, June 6, 2004 2:30 PM
Elliot, that why I played with the one at the hobby shop, $250.00 for a camera car is not where I would put my money. And it's still there.
tom

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Sunday, June 6, 2004 12:53 PM
Technologicly speaking the RailScope is a "dead dog". There is a good chance that the signal on the rails would conflict with TMCC. RailScope may actually have helped lead to TMCC. With airborne signal color cameras with sound available for under $50, it doesn't strike me as a very marketable product, as anyone can now go out and buy a camera and mount it on a car or engine themselves fairly easily. How well did the
K-line cars sell at the $250 price level?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 6, 2004 11:57 AM
Railscope used he tracks for carrying the video signal instead of broadcasting the way X-10 does. Liontech did demo an updated version of RailScope now called LionVision on the Horde layout that was dragged around on the Horde tour. The system appears to have been a variant of X-10 with the addiiton of stereo mic pickups as well as the color camera. The system was discussed by Gary Moreau during the original run of Trains Unlimited episode "Toy Trains". System was never released as a Lionel product and the widespread availability of X-10 technology allowed for people to achieve some of the same goals.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Frankfort, Kentucky
  • 1,758 posts
Posted by ben10ben on Sunday, June 6, 2004 11:45 AM
I think that the electronics were pretty unreliable, too. A couple of years ago, my local shop wanted to set one up as a display. He got it working, and it worked great for about 10 minutes, and then just quit. He wasn't able to get it to work again.

The camera did run off of battery power.

Lionel also made a Railscope upgrade kit, which contained a camera and a receiver. These can be had today for about $50 still sealed. A couple of years ago, Stout auctions sold 400 for a little over $500, a lot which the same dealer mentioned earlier regrets not bidding on.
Ben TCA 09-63474
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 6, 2004 11:39 AM

And that is why LIONEL wont reissue railscope anytime soon.

At the time when railscope was made it was difficult to find miniature cameras at a resonable price. that was why railscope was unique.

Now with x10 and others and the manufacture by KLine, Lionel will not do it again.

Alan
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 6, 2004 11:30 AM
Well, Lionel has this nasty habit of just letting things fade away, not improving them. Then, just like the M-10000, they'll re-issue it some years later for a fortune rather than do improvements all along and sell it for a decent price. I can see it in the 2010 catalog now: "RAILSCOPE!!! You remember it??!! YES!! NOW IN FULL-COLOR!! Now, it's even in an F-3 for better looking video! ONLY $2,200!!!!"
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Over the Rainbow!
  • 760 posts
Posted by eZAK on Sunday, June 6, 2004 10:25 AM
I made my own cam car by placing a cam into a engine.

I was just wondering why Lionel hasn't improved upon this.
It seems to me that a cam in an engine opposed to one on a flatbed would be a much better sell.

Has anyone seen an original for sale lately?
What are they going for?
Relax, Don't Worry, Have a Home Brew!</font id="size2"> Pat Zak</font id="size3">
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
Posted by spankybird on Sunday, June 6, 2004 8:06 AM
HI Pat,

I believe the K-Line car runs off track power and is in Color. I don’t have one, but was playing with one at the hobby store.

tom

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Over the Rainbow!
  • 760 posts
Lionel Railscope
Posted by eZAK on Saturday, June 5, 2004 11:33 PM
What ever happened to this?

With all the home-made and recent issue cam cars out there it made me wonder.

I know it ate batteries and was only B/W, But you would think it would have been improved aponed by now.

Has anyone ever kitbashed one to run off track power and in color?
Relax, Don't Worry, Have a Home Brew!</font id="size2"> Pat Zak</font id="size3">

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month