railfan23... I did find one fault thought (not sure if it is Atlas or CTT though) Anyone notice the Atlas ad on the inside cover? Look at the Union Pacific set.
Obviously, you haven't read the entire thread. Check out the first page of this thread.
Picked mine up on the newstand yesterday. Looks like a great issue. I did find one fault thought (not sure if it is Atlas or CTT though) Anyone notice the Atlas ad on the inside cover? Look at the Union Pacific set.
STILL WAITING......
I am the monster in your head...And I thought you'd learn by now, It seems you haven't yet.I am the venom in your skin --- Breaking Benjamin
brianel027I wonder if the engine had been a NYC unit with the spelling "Now York Contral" if that would qualify as a paint application mistake?
Bob Keller
The photo with the review of the MTH Premiere Line Tropicana set was better than a cartoon! What a hoot! One color paint job, one color decoration paint mask, and it's still wrong! Premiere line, no less.
I couldn't believe it... unbelievable, and a top-of-line MTH set. Though I guess I wouldn't be laughing if I had this set on order... I'd be rather annoyed. MARX Train did more logo accurate work on their dime-store train sets. So much for the argument of spending more more for accuracy or for defending the necessity of pre-ordering.
And I loved Bob's overly way too-kind comment "I had to think about it for a minute. Was too much paint applied, or was it an error in the design?"
I didn't have to think about it... I've done way too much repainting to know that was no error in paint application. I checked my PC references and found a photo of the real 4493 and it's not a prototypical rendering of an actual mistake either. This one is a huge goof, pure and simple.
I remember a previous review of a Penn Central loco someplace where the reviewer said something like "the decoration is good, but then how hard is it to screw up a single color paint job and a single color paint mask?" I guess now we know. I suppose this one might be chalked up to another "advantage" of having your factor across the Pacific Ocean instead of across the parking lot.
Being a fan of the Penn Central, I guess I notice this sort of thing unlike the "one office wag."
I wonder if the engine had been a NYC unit with the spelling "Now York Contral" if that would qualify as a paint application mistake?
I suppose if you are a fan of one of the predecessor railroads, you might consider this justice rendered. I would imagine that anyone who has ordered this set is a Penn Central fan and therefore might just be very annoyed with this goof, especially on a top-line set. But heck, I'd be annoyed if this mistake had been made on a lower end locomotive that I would want.
THIS is one of the reasons I will not pre-order anything. What's the use of pre-ordering something that turns out to be wrong?
brianel, Agent 027
"Praise the Lord. I may not have everything I desire, but the Lord has come through for what I need."
Wow!!! Look what is on page 45!!! Two Buckeyes on the same page.
Actually, it's three Buckeyes if you count me.
O-H-I-O indeed!
Thanks for reading CTT,
Terry
"Kooljock - DO NOT change that layout of yours..."
Hey Fife! I'm just thinking about sharpening up some of the scenery. Nothing drastic. Just some nicer lawns for the houses, and maybe some neater streets up on the mountain.
Jon
Glad you noticed Buckeye!!!!!!
Doug Murphy 'We few, we happy few, we band of brothers...' Henry V.
Kooljock - DO NOT change that layout of yours...
Congratulations to WES and DAVE for their RealTrax and Fastrack alternative plans.
O-H !!
I-O !!
Celebrating 18 years on the CTT Forum.
Buckeye Riveter......... OTTS Charter Member, a Roseyville Raider and a member of the CTT Forum since 2004..
Jelloway Creek, OH - ELV 1,100 - Home of the Baltimore, Ohio & Wabash RR
TCA 09-64284
Checked the emil today - STILL waiting....
A great issue as usual. The PONY&NJ layout article was superb. It made me want to push Lionel to build a TWO TRACK BASCULE BRIDGE though!
The update on the layout series makes me want to rip up some roads and go with the road material they used.
I also want to try some of that Noch grass mat material.
It's been awhile since I've done updates to my scenery, but this issue makes me want to give it a try!
Oh, and I've heard great things about the February issue....
I saw this thread and then looked at the stack of mail that I had and lo and behold, it was there! I really like the toy train style layouts and I thought that the idea of the fastrack as an alternative was a great idea.
Founding member of the All Aboard Fastrackers! See us at: www.allaboardfastrackers.com
Received my CTT today. Looks good. Already read the letters to the editor and after meeting Carl, I know tongue in cheek when I read it. Do you guys at CTT always have that much fun???
I also thought this issue was great. Since I'm a 1:43 car nut, I appreciated the quality of the cars used on "the Port of NY &NJ" layout, as well as the scenics in general.
No hard feelings here Dennis,I just read his reply and pushed the delete button. I didn't want to write an article, just show him some pictures.
"IT's GOOD TO BE THE KING",by Mel Brooks
Charter Member- Tardis Train Crew (TTC) - Detroit3railers- Detroit Historical society Glancy Modular trains- Charter member BTTS
Got mine yesterday. Great job again guys. Have read upto the Underground. Really enjoy the expanded photo section. Looking forward to the rest. For those AF Royal Blue fans, the back has a nice article. I can't see how a 1950s style layout would not have a place in CTT? Perhaps if we put in a few requests?
Dennis
TCA#09-63805
I think the new issue is outstanding! Great Job Guys! T.Y.
Inside front cover, the train at the top of the page has reverse print. other three are correct.
I haven't received my December issue yet. I look forward to the December issue.
A reader on the OGR forum stated:
"I just received my December 2009 copy of CTT and in the front cover is an ad for the new 2009 Industrial Rail Train sets. It was printed with a reversed copy reading cificaP noinU Looks like it was photographed in a mirror."
Then another reader reported:
"My copy has Union Pacific printed correctly. In fact, all print on that page is correct."
Was a correction made during the printing process?
Earl
Ok arrived today.Looked but not read.
Sorry Chief none of my pics. in there. Mr Carp says my RR with 1950s scenery style is not Classic TT material. Kindy strange huh.
Got mine. I think even ol' Earl will be happy this time 'round. Love the old snapshots.
SJ, Birdie says you have some photos in there. ????? Have not had time to look at mine.
God bless TCA 05-58541 Benefactor Member of the NRA, Member of the American Legion, Retired Boss Hog of Roseyville , KC&D Qualified
Excellant article on the real deal Tropicana Juice Train and the review of the MTH rendition.
Bill T.
Not yet. Me thinks mine is always on the bottom of the PO pile.
Good morning all,
Received mine yesterday as well. I scanned some of the articles, and really enjoyed the photo section. There are some impressive looking layouts in the issue as well. Glad to see the page count back up to 100, and some nice ads from Lionel, Bachmann and Atlas O.
Keep on training,
Mike C. from Indiana
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month