Some standardization of labeling is needed

[dougdagrump]

AND MAKE IT EASIER FOR THE CONSUMER !!!!!!!!!!
Sounds like heresy to me (a manufacturers point of view).
But speaking as a consumer it would be extremely helpful even if it were only in a few specific areas as mentioned in an earlier post.

[jkerklo]

Frank may have hit on one of the most important criterion, and I haven't even seen it included in reviews: operation on track and switches.

I would assume that the designers of the trains would test their designs on a variety of track systems and switches, but forum discussions suggest I am overly optimistic.

It could be a tricky parameter to state clearly, but something that says it has at least been tested on a track system or switch would be useful.

Minimum curve diameter is often stated for larger engines, but I have never seen a rating for rolling stock or a full train with engine and rolling stock.

John Kerklo
TCA 94-38455
www.Three-Rail.com

[IRONROOSTER]

At least start with scale. Then add the others. Minimum radius would be nice also. For the cars as well as the locos.
Enjoy
Paul

[Frank in Steam]

& if this happened does it mean that the couplers would have to stay closed and be at a consistent height, not to mention locomotives operating through switches and not stalling et al ?

[eZAK]

That would actually require the importers to test their own product! [:O][(-D]

That'll never happen![xx(]

[jkerklo]

Not sure train manufacturers would benefit; they probably don't like the magazine reviews either. If specs are given, they have to be met, consistantly, and this might be a difficulty.

Might be something for one of the smaller manufacturers to do; some of the Williams trains look like they would show well. Then larger companies would have to follow.

I like the idea, but don't see it happening.

John Kerklo
TCA 94-38455
www.Three-Rail.com

[FJ and G]

in the toy train industry.

Some examples:

1. Scale of the trains should be given
2. Authenticity of the train should be labeled
3. Something as simple as running characteristics should be included, for instance:

Tractive effort, or horsepower, or drawbar pull; perhaps in pounds and ounces. You shouldn't need to wait for the CTT and OGR reviews to come out to get performance and other characteristics. Why keep this a secret? OK, I know the answer--so that toy train magazines have something to review!

dav