Trains.com

Balancing Armatures?

859 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Southern MD
  • 315 posts
Posted by USNRol on Friday, November 23, 2007 9:56 AM
 EIS2 wrote:

I seriously doubt if you could tell any difference in the vibration levels in the motor.  Any weight imbalance in the armature will not have much effect because the moment arm is so short.  Additionally, the motor RPM is not high enough to make a small imbalance noticeable. 

Earl

Agree...and also any imbalances are likely to very insignificant relative to the total mass of the motor. 

Roland

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Kaukauna WI
  • 2,115 posts
Posted by 3railguy on Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:13 PM

I think the weight of O gauge engines along with the mass in the power truck or frame in the case of steam abosorbs any vibration. Plus like others say, we generally don't run our trains at 200 smph. I can see where balancing would save wear on bronze sleeve motor bearings such as those used in spur gear motors.

John Long Give me Magnetraction or give me Death.
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • 621 posts
Posted by dsmith on Thursday, November 22, 2007 8:42 PM
I used to race 1/24th scale slotcars and regularly had the armatures balanced and the commutators trued.  Also, the magnets were shimmed to get the stationary magnetic field as close to the amature as possible.  This was important for racing engines that run at incredilbly high speed.  For model trains though, they run at slow speeds even when they are going fast.  I have no practical experience but I would really doubt that there would be any detectable difference if model train engine armatures were balanced.  However it might be possible for a model train engine motor to run a little more smoothly if commutators were trued on a lathe with a diamond cutter.  This would allow the brushes to make more consistent contact with the commutator.  This is also a guess on my part.  And getting the stationary magnetic field closer to the armature seems impossible to me.  I just love postwar engines for what they are.....a good running and very repairable old technology.

  David from Dearborn  

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: 28 Sager Place Irvington, NJ 07111
  • 265 posts
Posted by LS1Heli on Thursday, November 22, 2007 12:57 PM
I agree. Plus how can a postwar engine get any smoother?
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Rolesville, NC
  • 15,416 posts
Posted by ChiefEagles on Thursday, November 22, 2007 1:11 AM
Sign - Ditto [#ditto]

 God bless TCA 05-58541   Benefactor Member of the NRA,  Member of the American Legion,   Retired Boss Hog of Roseyville Laugh,   KC&D QualifiedCowboy       

              

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 815 posts
Posted by EIS2 on Thursday, November 22, 2007 12:50 AM

I seriously doubt if you could tell any difference in the vibration levels in the motor.  Any weight imbalance in the armature will not have much effect because the moment arm is so short.  Additionally, the motor RPM is not high enough to make a small imbalance noticeable. 

Earl

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Bawlmer Hon
  • 314 posts
Balancing Armatures?
Posted by choochin3 on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 11:23 PM

Hi Guys,

A friend of mine races HO scale slot cars,and he has his motor armatures balanced.

Have any of you tried this on say a postwar steam engine?

I was thinking of trying to do this on some of my older engines.

Maybe I'll get smoother operation with this.

 

Carl T.

I'm out Choochin!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month