While checking out the "Layout Challenge of the Week", I see Perry, who occasionally treats us to some photos in Sunday Photo Fun is one the featured layouts. This is just one of the most beautifully sceniced layouts I have seen, and it appears to be all tubular track.
You can build a super detailed layout and still use the track system must of us grew up with, as evidenced below:
Different strokes for different folks. I agree, Perry has a fabulous layout! Frank, I also am envious of your layout and like seeing your progress pictures (I hope you make your deadline). However, for me, I think real depth is added to a layout when solid rail w/ties is used.
It is interesting that you pointed this out, because when I looked at the layout challenge one of my first thoughts was, "Boy, this guy really knows how to put a cool layout together, it would be even better if he had used a more realistic track system..."
Regards,
John O
I'm totally tubular as well. It's been reliable for 100 years so why change. If you add ties and ballast it can certainly look really nice.
Mike S.
Different strokes for different folks (which accounts for why there are so many different track systems out there now).
However, that is one gorgeous layout by any measure, and the scenery and detailing would stand out no matter what track system or type was used.
"OK fine, for sure, for sure"
"Like, oh my god. That is totally TUBULAR"
pbjwilson wrote: "OK fine, for sure, for sure""Like, oh my god. That is totally TUBULAR"
I think Frank was a train nut too.
underworld
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month