Trains.com

? concerning N&W Y-6 rebuilding

2547 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 318 posts
? concerning N&W Y-6 rebuilding
Posted by VAPEURCHAPELON on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:01 PM

Sorry if this came up earlier, but I couldn't find any info on this by using the search bar.

I have read that for the N&W test runs of 1952 which compared steam engines to diesel, N&W Y-6b #2197 has been upgraded slightly. That included a booster or intercepting valve which increased dbhp and tractive effort. The same source states that by shopping all the other Y-6 engines they got that valve, too. My question is if that is correct, and if so, what were then the remaining differences between Y-6, Y-6a and Y-6b engines. To me it seems that N&W then had a large fleet of almost identical - also in power - 2-8-8-2s where different nomenclature appears senseless. Can someone help?

Many Thanks.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,020 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:56 PM

My question is if that is correct, and if so, what were then the remaining differences between Y-6, Y-6a and Y-6b engines. To me it seems that N&W then had a large fleet of almost identical - also in power - 2-8-8-2s where different nomenclature appears senseless. Can someone help?

vapeur,

The Y5 thru Y6b classes were modified with the external reducing/booster valve and the addition of lead in the front engine frame. Afterwards for the most part they were all the same, at least as far as tonnage ratings on each district. With some number changes, these classes were then all in the 2100 series with the exception of the last Y6b #2200. They were then known in the N&W Employee Timetables as "Improved". To the men they were "twenty one hundreds". There was no such Y6c as one author would lead you to believe.

.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:14 PM
N&W was the last railroad in the US to take steam development seriously. But, even the most advanced steam power in the US was toast once they were unable to obtain compressors, feedwater heaters and other outside supplied appliances. Then, too the EMD GP9 and Alco RS11 were just good enough to make it all a matter of time for steam in North America.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 318 posts
Posted by VAPEURCHAPELON on Wednesday, May 30, 2007 7:19 PM

Jim,

thank you very much for your detailed answer. That is I was interested in. Sorry for the delay, but I was away a week and offline.

Thanks again 

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:14 PM
The only visible diference that I'm aware of between the Y-6b and previous engines is that the Y-6b had a Worthington SA FW heater ahead of the stack and one air pump on either side along w/ a VERY slight forward tilt of the smokestack, while the earlier engines had a straight smokestack w/ a Worthington BL F/W heater on the left side and 2 airpumps on the right
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,020 posts
Posted by BigJim on Friday, June 1, 2007 3:58 AM
All of the Y's that had the multi-valve front end throttle had the slanted stack.

.

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter