Trains.com

SP Overnights: Coast Line operations in the 1950s

1052 views
2 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Plymouth, UK
  • 169 posts
SP Overnights: Coast Line operations in the 1950s
Posted by Brian M on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 4:02 PM

I'd be very grateful for any information on operations specifically with the designated all-black boxcars.  I have learned that the Overnight was apparently switched from the caboose end of the train during its run in both directions. I originally thought that it was a straight-through train between San Francisco and Los Angeles with no intermediary stops, drop-offs or pick-ups, but it seems that this did happen.

If true, can anyone tell me how this was done - did the train get added to on the journey (and cars dropped off)?  Where, and how many at each station?  Whilst the train size was no doubt quite long at times, Thompson & Signor's "Southern Pacific's Coast Line Pictorial" shows a 12-boxcar train, with rider coach and caboose behind MT 4362 on page 285. A good example of a short main-line train with big power.

Thanks in advance of any replies.

Brian M

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:24 PM
I seriously doubt that #373/374 did any en route switching in the steam era.   I know that it didn't in the TOFC era (when I worked for the SP)
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Plymouth, UK
  • 169 posts
Posted by Brian M on Thursday, March 1, 2007 2:29 AM

Hello , Jim.

From Signor's "Southern Pacific's Coast Line", page 150: "The cars were painted entirely black with the usual SP medallion... and the word "Overnight" on the arrow... the Coast Merchandise trains were blocked in reverse of standard freight trains, which had the first and subsequent setouts blocked behind the engine.  the CM trains were blocked with the first setouts ahead of the caboose because the road engine was not cut off on the entire 471 mile run.  All switching en route was performed by waiting switch engines which worked from the rear end of the trains". 

It therefore seems clear, from John Signor, that en-route switching DID happen.

Brian 

 

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter