Trains.com

Excursion Train Locomotives.

1001 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Excursion Train Locomotives.
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 5, 2006 5:44 PM
When watching DVD'S on steam excursion trains. I see diesel locomotives as a second locomotive. Why is this done? Is the power of the diesel needed to pull the train? Or is the diesel a backup in case the steam locomotive breaks down?                                                                  dlm
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Saturday, August 5, 2006 6:46 PM
A number of reasons come to mind:

(1) To satisfy insurance requirements
(2) Additional power when needed
(3) Dynamic brake capability
(4) The ability to allow drifting to conserve
fuel and water.
(5) Provide the host road an oppertunity
to fly the flag
(6) Provide protection power if needed

The day of diesel backup is here to stay, several large excursion steamers past and present were/are equipped with MU controls to place control under a common crew..

Dave
SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 5, 2006 8:50 PM

Thanks Dave,

   Those are valid reasons.  But I think seeing the diesel sort ruins the picture of the steam era operated trains.                                                                                               dlm

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Saturday, August 5, 2006 9:03 PM
 dlm wrote:

Thanks Dave,

   Those are valid reasons.  But I think seeing the diesel sort ruins the picture of the steam era operated trains.                                                                                               dlm

Another point, is that no major carrier will allow steam excursions, except UP (when they are in the mood and it's either 844 or 3985- both OK) and CP (2816 only). This will not change anytime soon, or perhaps ,ever.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: West end of Chicago's Famous Racetrack
  • 2,239 posts
Posted by Poppa_Zit on Sunday, August 6, 2006 2:34 AM
 PBenham wrote:
 dlm wrote:

Thanks Dave,

   Those are valid reasons.  But I think seeing the diesel sort ruins the picture of the steam era operated trains.                                                                                               dlm

Another point, is that no major carrier will allow steam excursions, except UP (when they are in the mood and it's either 844 or 3985- both OK) and CP (2816 only). This will not change anytime soon, or perhaps ,ever.

That's not true. Milwaukee Road 261 runs on BNSF track -- albeit as an Amtrak special -- at least once or twice a year, often down the Mississippi River and through Illinois. And just a few weeks ago, it ran all over Wisconsin on CP trackage that Amtrak has rights on.

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. They are not entitled, however, to their own facts." No we can't. Charter Member J-CASS (Jaded Cynical Ascerbic Sarcastic Skeptics) Notary Sojac & Retired Foo Fighter "Where there's foo, there's fire."
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 5:26 PM
Union Pacific has a long standing Verbotten policy to foreign steam, the only exception is when the 4449 in AFT service required repairs at the Omaha Shops. Even under these circumstances, a pilot locomotive was supplied, none other then Northern 844(4) which was also in the shops and released at the same time, double headed to Council Bluffs Ia.


Dave
SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Guelph, Ont.
  • 1,476 posts
Posted by BR60103 on Friday, August 11, 2006 10:33 PM
One other use for diesels is to provide hotel power (lights, air conditioning) especially if they are using more modern coaches.

--David

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Sunday, August 13, 2006 6:46 AM
The classic example is Clinchfield 1, which was so small that it could only two or three cars on its own.  CRR took two of its F7B's and painted them to match the excursion coaches to provide the necessary horsepower to handle 10-15 car trains. It also fitted the steam locomotive with a modified hostler control to control the diesels.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter