Trains.com

RESTRICTION ON DOME CAR USE

3183 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Sunday, July 9, 2006 7:06 AM
For comparison, the clearance on a bi-level gallery coach is 15' 10".
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, July 9, 2006 3:13 AM
Wires can sag on very hot days.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Friday, July 7, 2006 4:21 PM
Since the catenary PRR installed in Washington Union was (And I assume still is) above the top of the butterfly sheds. The Washington Terminal Railroad's last supplement to the Penn Central's Cheasapeake region time table showed the catenary to be 19'6" above the rail head. The height of the catenary on the approaches was 18', which should not have been a problem for riders in the B&O's domes. It is not a problem for Superliners, so what gives, here?
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Friday, July 7, 2006 8:05 AM
Dome Clearances.
SP 3/4 domes 15'2"
GN,AT&SF. CB&Q Budd Full Domes 15'6"
B&O P/S Domes 15'3"
C&O Budd Short 15'53/4"
Milw Full Domes 15'7"
Amtrak Superliners 16'2"
CB&Q pattern Dome 16'2"
Budd short domes 15'10"
Ultradomes 17'4" - 18'1"

Hope that helps.

TTFN Al
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 6, 2006 9:12 PM
I rode a train in 1968 and the dome car was empty and I was told not to go up due to concern about the caternary being to close. It was the B&O/C&O track to the west of Washington DC. Phil
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 163 posts
Posted by agentatascadero on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 4:51 PM
I've never seen vertical clearance numbers for the various types of domes, but I'm sure we all would like to see how they compare. I would think the Budd short domes are the tallest, and the ex-C&O(Pullman? ACF?) domes the lowest, with everything else in between.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, May 29, 2006 3:26 PM
The SP domes were lower than the standard domes.
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Monday, May 29, 2006 1:31 AM
The East wasn't the only place w/ clearance problems. The equipment list for the City of San Francisco in the 50s shows domes from Chicago to Ogden. I believe the SP ran dome taverns on the COSF from Ogden to Oakland, but they were Sacto Shops built and, I believe, lower than most.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 7:15 AM
Clearances were the issue. Except for B&O and Wabash, and a few other railroads later with second-hand domes, nobody ran domes east of the Mississippi River because of tight clearances, especially at GCT and Penn Station. At any rate, it was a tight fit at Washington Union Station, which may be why the dome was off-limits through the Capitol Hill tunnel.

Even today, those tight clearances are still an issue. Only the Capitol Limited, Auto-Train, Sunset Limited and City of New Orleans are assigned Superliners in the area east of the Mississippi River.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
RESTRICTION ON DOME CAR USE
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:26 AM
WAS IT JUST CLEARANCE PROBLEMS OR WAS IT THE DIFFERENCE IN APPLIED VOLTAGE TO THE CATERNARY THAT RESTRICTED DOME CARE USE FROM THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR BUT ALLOWED THEIR USE UNDER GN AND MILW ELECTRIFICATIONS.? I REMEMBER NOT BEING ALLOWED INTO A DOME ON AMTRAK'S CAPITOL LIMITED WHILE THE TRAIN WAS IN WASHTON UNION STATION,

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter