BaltACD Jones1945 Speaking of workplace relationship, a trainwreck happened in Springer, New Mexico, Sep 1956 comes to my mind. A Santa Fe Chief run head-on into a mail train. If I remember correctly, I read somewhere that the engineer on the Chief had a beef with the engineer on the mail train. Although it had nothing to do with the accident, it is noted by the related authorities during the investigation. https://dotlibrary.specialcollection.net/Document?db=DOT-RAILROAD&query=(select+3647)
Jones1945 Speaking of workplace relationship, a trainwreck happened in Springer, New Mexico, Sep 1956 comes to my mind. A Santa Fe Chief run head-on into a mail train. If I remember correctly, I read somewhere that the engineer on the Chief had a beef with the engineer on the mail train. Although it had nothing to do with the accident, it is noted by the related authorities during the investigation.
https://dotlibrary.specialcollection.net/Document?db=DOT-RAILROAD&query=(select+3647)
Thanks for the link, Balt. According to the record provided by the link above, the engine of the mail train was ATSF 30C/30B:
RailPictures.Net
The engine of the Chief was ATSF 41
Jones 3D Modeling Club https://www.youtube.com/Jones3DModelingClub
Overmod Flintlock76 You know Mr. Jones, that story about the engineers reminds me of one from military history. What about Theobald and Buckner Jr. in the Aleutians?
Flintlock76 You know Mr. Jones, that story about the engineers reminds me of one from military history.
What about Theobald and Buckner Jr. in the Aleutians?
Hmm, never heard of that one.
However, LtCommander Bulkeley in his book "They Were Expendable" mentions two US Army brigadier generals in the Phillipines during the Japanese invasion who'd hated each other since West Point and still couldn't put their differences aside, even in the face of the Japanese onslaught. He didn't give their names, wisely so. Makes you wonder.
OK, I just looked up Theobald and Buckner. Looks like a classic personality clash between someone who wants to go out, kick-butt, and win (General Buckner) and another one who's more concerned with not losing than he is about winning (Admiral Theobald.) Oh brother. I won't bore everyone with the whole story.
Jones1945Speaking of workplace relationship, a trainwreck happened in Springer, New Mexico, Sep 1956 comes to my mind. A Santa Fe Chief run head-on into a mail train. If I remember correctly, I read somewhere that the engineer on the Chief had a beef with the engineer on the mail train. Although it had nothing to do with the accident, it is noted by the related authorities during the investigation.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Flintlock76You know Mr. Jones, that story about the engineers reminds me of one from military history.
Jones1945 Flintlock76 Wow, what is that thing? It accelerated like a scalded cat, and then some! Rough road indeed! Reminds me of a story... A railroad track maintanance foreman was riding in the cab when the engineer turned to him and said, "You know, it takes a lot of nerve to sit up here and run one of these things!" "Really?" said the foreman. "It takes a lot more nerve for me to sit up here and ride with you!" "How so?" " I know what you're ridin' on!" Love your story, Wayne. Such a humorous way to teach that arrogant engineer a lesson, reminds him of the spirit of cooperation in railroading. The maintenance foreman ensures the train track is safe for every single train to run on it, the engineer ensures the train arrives at the destination safe and on time; everyone is equally important. Their salaries would be different though, but a person who is humble and helpful would bring him good things that money can't buy. Speaking of workplace relationship, a trainwreck happened in Springer, New Mexico, Sep 1956 comes to my mind. A Santa Fe Chief run head-on into a mail train. If I remember correctly, I read somewhere that the engineer on the Chief had a beef with the engineer on the mail train. Although it had nothing to do with the accident, it is noted by the related authorities during the investigation.
Flintlock76 Wow, what is that thing? It accelerated like a scalded cat, and then some! Rough road indeed! Reminds me of a story... A railroad track maintanance foreman was riding in the cab when the engineer turned to him and said, "You know, it takes a lot of nerve to sit up here and run one of these things!" "Really?" said the foreman. "It takes a lot more nerve for me to sit up here and ride with you!" "How so?" " I know what you're ridin' on!"
Wow, what is that thing? It accelerated like a scalded cat, and then some!
Rough road indeed! Reminds me of a story...
A railroad track maintanance foreman was riding in the cab when the engineer turned to him and said, "You know, it takes a lot of nerve to sit up here and run one of these things!"
"Really?" said the foreman. "It takes a lot more nerve for me to sit up here and ride with you!"
"How so?"
" I know what you're ridin' on!"
Love your story, Wayne. Such a humorous way to teach that arrogant engineer a lesson, reminds him of the spirit of cooperation in railroading. The maintenance foreman ensures the train track is safe for every single train to run on it, the engineer ensures the train arrives at the destination safe and on time; everyone is equally important. Their salaries would be different though, but a person who is humble and helpful would bring him good things that money can't buy.
Speaking of workplace relationship, a trainwreck happened in Springer, New Mexico, Sep 1956 comes to my mind. A Santa Fe Chief run head-on into a mail train. If I remember correctly, I read somewhere that the engineer on the Chief had a beef with the engineer on the mail train. Although it had nothing to do with the accident, it is noted by the related authorities during the investigation.
You know Mr. Jones, that story about the engineers reminds me of one from military history.
Seems there were two Russian generals in the czarist era who hated each other from their service academy days, even going so far as to have a fist fight on a train station platform during the Russo-Japanese War. Not proper behavior for generals, although I'm sure the troops got a kick out of it.
THEN they were teamed up at the start of World War One and told to attack into East Prussia. They still couldn't get along and co-operate, and Von Hindenburg smashed them both!
Overmod The W-1 design has outside frames, and those leaf springs are functional suspension. Unlike the Roosen motor locomotive, which has outside motors and 'end drive' similar to quill drive on one end of each axle (the motors alternating by side), the W-1 motors are mounted centrally, between the drivers, with cylinders acting vertically past both the front and back sides of the axle. Note the 55:19 gear ratio, which gives the equivalent of about 92 strokes per revolution per engine, but will force the engine to move at high cyclic rpm during any drifting. Interesting to contemplate the high-speed-slipping potential of this engine in service. They have very little shock attenuation visible in their gear drive, and I can't imagine that maintaining the steam, exhaust, lube and control connections in that area, even with the skirts providing a partial low-pressure area (or with a full belly pan from pilot to ashpan), would have been a pleasant ongoing experience. If only Emerson had lived a couple of years longer, or the war not intervened... MEANWHILE does anyone here have data on the actual layout, design, or operation of the B&O's short flirtation with front-end stokers around the time we became involved in WWII? Supposedly over 70 locomotives were so equipped ... yet I can't find any real technical discussion of either the approach or its implementation. I have my suspicions on what happened, but I'd like to know more actual historical fact...
The W-1 design has outside frames, and those leaf springs are functional suspension.
Unlike the Roosen motor locomotive, which has outside motors and 'end drive' similar to quill drive on one end of each axle (the motors alternating by side), the W-1 motors are mounted centrally, between the drivers, with cylinders acting vertically past both the front and back sides of the axle.
Note the 55:19 gear ratio, which gives the equivalent of about 92 strokes per revolution per engine, but will force the engine to move at high cyclic rpm during any drifting. Interesting to contemplate the high-speed-slipping potential of this engine in service.
They have very little shock attenuation visible in their gear drive, and I can't imagine that maintaining the steam, exhaust, lube and control connections in that area, even with the skirts providing a partial low-pressure area (or with a full belly pan from pilot to ashpan), would have been a pleasant ongoing experience. If only Emerson had lived a couple of years longer, or the war not intervened...
MEANWHILE does anyone here have data on the actual layout, design, or operation of the B&O's short flirtation with front-end stokers around the time we became involved in WWII? Supposedly over 70 locomotives were so equipped ... yet I can't find any real technical discussion of either the approach or its implementation. I have my suspicions on what happened, but I'd like to know more actual historical fact...
Thanks, Overmod. That means the untouched up drawing I posted was actually showing the unfinalized W-1 without much detail of the Besler steam engine and the outside frame.
Four pairs of heavy steam motors like this mounted on the driving wheel axles without adequate shock-absorbing device, all of them would be bouncing with the axles when the driving wheels hitting the seams between the rail, switches ..... probably only works "better" on seamless rail I guess?
Miningman https://ia801408.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/32/items/shortbando1937/shortbando1937_jp2.zip&file=shortbando1937_jp2/shortbando1937_0057.jp2&scale=4&rotate=90
https://ia801408.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/32/items/shortbando1937/shortbando1937_jp2.zip&file=shortbando1937_jp2/shortbando1937_0057.jp2&scale=4&rotate=90
Thanks a lot for these useful links, Vince. Those are some very high-quality photos of B&O's 4-4-4, 4-6-4 and 4-4-4-4!
https://collections.digitalmaryland.org/digital/collection/mdbo/search
First time ever looking at this untouched up conceptual drawing of The B&O Class W-1 Besler Type 4-2-2-2-2-4 (click to enlarge)! In other touched-up versions, there are four B&O logos on the journal box of the drivers on the streamlined shrouding, and the four individual “Besler” steam engine inside the skirt was interpreted as a leaf springs due to the shape of the Besler steam engine. In this "original" drawing, all Besler steam engines were covered by the skirt and visible from outside through the grills.
A Europe example, DRB Class 19.10
That mention of the "Railroad Wonder Trip" reminded me of something.
I've got a superb DVD called "Northeastern Steam 1935-1937" where an NYC "Wonder Trip" is shown, also a few other rail enthusiasts trips as well, PRR, NH, and others. Restored footage and well done.
56 minutes long, it's available from Anchor Videos, http://www.train-video.com
Here's the direct link, http://www.train-video.com/rvp202d.html
I recommend it highly!
I've met the seller at a number of train shows, nice guy!
Miningman
The is the first I have EVER heard of this 16 cylinder steam project.
My father, being 14 at the time of the Fair of the Iron Horse, purchased a set of 'stereo slides' and the appropriate viewer that was sold about the event. I have the set and it is mostly complete (a slide ot two may be missing). The location where I closed out my career was on the property where the Fair of the Iron Horse was held.
https://collections.digitalmaryland.org/digital/collection/bomu/search/searchterm/george%20h%20emerson
https://archive.org/details/shortbando1937/page/n5
MiningmanNot to be outdone by Pennsy, the New York Central organizes a big railfan trip.
Wouldn't 'ya know. I happen to have the brochure from that trip (no, sadly, I wasn't in attendance).
NYC_Alco by Edmund, on Flickr
NYC_Alco_0003 by Edmund, on Flickr
NYC_Alco_0004 by Edmund, on Flickr
NYC_Alco_0005 by Edmund, on Flickr
NYC_Alco_0006 by Edmund, on Flickr
NYC_Alco_0007 by Edmund, on Flickr
NYC_Alco_0008 by Edmund, on Flickr
NYC_Alco_0009 by Edmund, on Flickr
A wonderful time was had by all—
As far as I can discern this is the only recognizable remaining structure still standing from the Alco complex:
Alco_site5 by Edmund, on Flickr
I have highlighted the same building in this aeroplane view:
Alco_remains by Edmund, on Flickr
A casino and brewery have recently been added to the site.
Cheers, Ed
Not to be outdone by Pennsy, the New York Central organizes a big railfan trip.
Beats them to the punch by a month.
Fascinating.. good find!
Some more of the story of that Model L (built 1941) including a picture of it in yellow (!) with Conrail lettering (!!)
https://yngfire.com/index.php?threads/pennsylvania-rr-fd-altoona-pa-1895-1985.12642/
Says they ran their Ahrens-Fox all the way to 1965!
Wow! A Mack pumper!
Even the PRR's Altoona Works Fire Department had pure class!
Miningman A railfan dream.
I have a flyer from the Great Altoona Tour from the Chicago side:
PRR_tour_cover by Edmund, on Flickr
PRR_tour_inside by Edmund, on Flickr
PRR_tour_back by Edmund, on Flickr
Another Altoona Treat!
RR_views_0035 by Edmund, on Flickr
RR_views_0034 by Edmund, on Flickr
It's all about the steam baby, all about the steam.
MiningmanA railfan dream.
And not a word about the pending electrification all the way to Harrisburg, and the DD2 being tested to optimize performance on it, or any of the pending thought even at that time to extend it over the mountains to Pittsburgh, prioritized as late as 1943...
Agent: They hated you in Mechanicsville (D&H).
Burns: But they loved me in Altoona.
Burns and Allen learned their craft the hard way on the vaudeville circuit, bombing in some places and wowing them in others.
A railfan dream.
From Mike:
George Burns in Altoona
Oh wow, "The Freight Wreck At Altoona!"
That old song's been part of a private joke between myself and Lady Firestorm since we read "Scalded To Death By The Steam," that history and anthology of classic train wreck songs. Man, there used to be a LOT of them!
Joke goes like this...
"The Wreck Of The Old Number One."
"The Wreck Of The Old Number Two."
"The Wreck Of The Old Number Three."
"The Wreck Of The Old Number Four." AND...
"The Freight Wreck At Altoona!"
Spoken in a apropriately grim voice.
Mike strikes again! Thanks Mike, and thanks Vince for passing it on!
Seems kind of up-beat for a wreck song though, doesn't it?
Altoona Train Wreck and Marion Try Slaughter
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter