Trains.com

Steam Locomotives of the Great Northern Railway

3040 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, January 4, 2018 12:52 PM

I'm more familiar with GN's east end, but I would assume it was similar in the west. GN's line between the Twin Cities and Duluth/Superior had a decent amount of traffic, but not enough to normally warrant the largest GN engines. They used Pacifics for passenger, Mikes for freight...and starting in the 1940's, A-B sets of FTs for both.

Stix
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 306 posts
Posted by SPer on Wednesday, January 3, 2018 12:40 PM

I thought large GN steam locomtives run the entire system

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, January 2, 2018 2:59 PM

I guess short answer would be "they didn't need to"? I don't think it was not having enough clearance or anything, they just didn't need their biggest passenger and freight engines to haul the trains running between Seattle and Portland.

Stix
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, December 29, 2017 9:49 PM

Yes, steam was traded for electric at Wenatchee and Skykomish on either side of Cascade Tunnnel.  The electrified division covered both the tunnel and the long grades leading up to it.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, December 29, 2017 3:44 PM

SPer

Didn't Great Northern large steam locomotives such as Mallets,Northerns and Mountains, travel through the Cascade Tunnel to get to Seattle and Portland.

 

GN's Cascade Tunnel was electrified in 1909 and re-electrified in 1927 shortly before the new, longer Cascade Tunnel was completed.  At 7.79 miles, I doubt steam was allowed except as dead-in-train.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Friday, December 29, 2017 3:42 PM

To Seattle yes, to Portland no. The only way GN proper got into Portland was via the Seattle Sub from Seattle.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 306 posts
Posted by SPer on Friday, December 29, 2017 3:33 PM

Didn't Great Northern large steam locomotives such as Mallets,Northerns and Mountains, travel through the Cascade Tunnel to get to Seattle and Portland.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Thursday, December 28, 2017 10:36 PM

My guess is grades. GN steam would have been operated only between Seattle and Portland, and the Seattle Subdivision between these points has a 1% ruling grade. The bigger power was better used in the mountains.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, December 28, 2017 10:01 PM

The GN did operate between Portland and Seattle, over NP tracks. I do not know how many freights the GN operated nto Portland, but there was the pool passenger service, with the UP using the NP track part way, but using the Union Station (along with the Milwaukee) in Seattle, whereas the NP and GN trains used the King Street Station there.

Johnny

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Thursday, December 28, 2017 9:43 PM

Wouldn't their Portland section trains been handeled by the SP&S ?

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 306 posts
Steam Locomotives of the Great Northern Railway
Posted by SPer on Thursday, December 28, 2017 6:20 PM

I bought a book the Steam Locomotives of the Great Northern Railway and i found out that none of the GN 4-8-4s or Mallets went to Portland, Oregon in the steam era. I don't know why GN kept them out of the Rose City for a reason. so what's the reason.

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter