Trains.com

Marking on side of railroad track

13211 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:56 PM

archiemjm

The piece of rail is associated with a gold/silver mine mill site.  The rail could be for a small tram that was used to transport small loads of ore. It was unlikely the rail would have been used for a train due to the location of the mill.  Would that then explain the 96 lbs rail?

Thanks for your information!

 

 

It could, but then again despite all our suppositions that  "3  96"  might just mean the rail was made in March of 1896.

I guess we'll never know.  Maybe there's some things we aren't MEANT to know. :) 

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,020 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, January 13, 2016 11:42 AM

Excuse me?

.

  • Member since
    January 2016
  • 2 posts
Posted by archiemjm on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 6:15 PM

The piece of rail is associated with a gold/silver mine mill site.  The rail could be for a small tram that was used to transport small loads of ore. It was unlikely the rail would have been used for a train due to the location of the mill.  Would that then explain the 96 lbs rail?

Thanks for your information!

 

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,020 posts
Posted by BigJim on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 6:03 PM

Firelock76
If I remember right, U-rail goes back to at least the 1840's.  That one old hunka iron you got there!

YAHTZEE!!!

.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 5:30 PM

Don't bother to delete, but if you ever figure out how to do it let me know.

If I remember right, U-rail goes back to at least the 1840's.  That one old hunka iron you got there!

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,020 posts
Posted by BigJim on Monday, January 11, 2016 8:37 PM

Don't know what happened. I didn't delete the photos! Anyway, they're back. Now how do I delete this post?

.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Monday, January 11, 2016 5:16 PM

Thanks for that photo post Big Jim!  It's fascinating to see the evolution of rail, from the U-rail to the present day.

By the way, I saw youuuuuuuuu reflected in the display glass!  Almost (but not quite) blew your cover!

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,020 posts
Posted by BigJim on Monday, January 11, 2016 11:18 AM

Here is the rail size display from the VMT of what was used on the N&W Ry.

.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,020 posts
Posted by BigJim on Monday, January 11, 2016 2:32 AM

Firelock76
I can't account for 96 pound rail, seems like an oddball size. 

I think you will be surprised at what size rail was made. I'll try to get down to VMT today and take a picture! Until then, here is a photo of a piece of 60 lb. rail given to me that came from the Virginia & Tennessee Ry.

BTW, that photo from the OP, I couldn't tell what that was other than some concrete. You got a better photo?

.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, January 10, 2016 5:18 PM

According to Robert Selph Henry's book "this Fascinating Railroad Business" (1943) by the time the book was published rail markings looked like this:

11228  RE  OH TENNESSEE 1939 /////

Decipher the above...

11228 = 112 pounds to the yard of No. 28 section

RE = American Railway Engineering Association Design

OH = Open hearth steel

Tennessee =  Birmingham District Mills of the Tennessee Coal and Iron Company

1939 ///// = Fifth month of the year 1939.

On the other side of the rail would be seen something like this...

63345  E  17

Which translates as this rail was rolled fifth from the top rolled from Ingot No. 17 poured from heat No. 63345 of the mill who's name is on the other side.

If the rail was manufactured under a controlled cooling process there's be a CC marking and if the ends were hardened by heat treatment there'd be a additional marking of CH.

The seven rail mills in Mr. Henry's time were at Pittsburgh, Bethlehem, Buffalo, Indiana Harbor, Gary, Bimingham, and Pueblo.

Anyway, that's how it was by the 1940's.   At that time 112 pound to the yard was the most commonly laid rail, 131 pound was used on the heavy duty lines.  The Pennsylvania Railroad had the heaviest, 152 pound rail in the heaviest duty sections.

As an aside, up to several years ago the rails in front of the Ashland, VA train station, former RF&P now CSX, had 1940 manufacture dates!  Pretty cool to see!

I can't account for 96 pound rail, seems like an oddball size.  Possibly it was custom made?  Maybe for an interurban or trolley line?

 

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Sunday, January 10, 2016 2:17 AM

I would assume that "8 96" likely means it was rolled in the 8th month (August) of 1896.  The rail weight would follow the date but is not visible in the picture.  Checking my photos of late 19th century rail in Canada reveals a variety of ways were used to indicate the month in that time frame.

John

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Saturday, January 9, 2016 6:35 PM

timz

Anybody heard of 96-pound rail?

 

I was thinking the same thing.  I think the mill name and date stamp are usually together, with the weight and section type in a different place.  I'm familiar with AREA 85, 90, 100 and 115 lb sections.  If the rail hadn't been renewed since the 1940s, a date of 1896 is not at all crazy.

I have found a listing for ASCE 95 lb sections dating to 1940.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Saturday, January 9, 2016 4:38 PM

Anybody heard of 96-pound rail?

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 573 posts
Posted by pajrr on Friday, January 8, 2016 6:26 PM

Hi, Scranton certainly did make railroad rail. The first steel "T" rail (modern rail that you see today) was produced there starting in 1874. On your piece of rail there would be Scranton, and a year that the rail was made. The 96" would be the weight of the rail. Rail was made in 39' lengths. The weight is the weight of the rail PER YARD. The result is that your rail weighs 96 pounds x 13 yards (39') = 1,248 pounds. In modern times, welded (a.k.a. ribbon) rail is rolled in 1/4 mile lengths and welded into 1 mile long rails on site. Modern heavy duty mainlime rail is normally 132 lb. A 1 mile length of 132 lb rail weighs 232,320 lbs. (132lb x 1760 yards) The heavier the rail the bigger the load it can carry. In early times 90lb would have been considered heavy. Today, that is about the lightest rail you will find in regular service. I have an abandoned railyard near my house. It was an Erie Railroad facility. The rails in the weeds are 80lb made in 1912.

  • Member since
    January 2016
  • 2 posts
Marking on side of railroad track
Posted by archiemjm on Friday, January 8, 2016 3:59 PM

Hello, 

I looking for some help to figure out what some markings mean on the side of a railroad track. I recently found a few track segments while out on a survey.  It looks as if the it says "S...NTON      3     96" The letters between  the "S" and "T" could be C, R, A, but it’s too corroded to tell with any great certainty.  Did Scranton, PA ever produce railroad track.  Do you guys have any other idea as to what these marking refer to? Information about a manufacture or date would be most helpful.  The rail should date from 1890-1940's.  Click on the link to see the markings

photostream

Any information is helpful!

Thanks, 

MJM

 

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter