Trains.com

Loyal to Steam

2633 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 306 posts
Loyal to Steam
Posted by SPer on Thursday, July 18, 2013 11:45 AM

Why did Norfolk and Western stayed with steam and Santa Fe did not

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:31 PM

N&W operated in coal mine territory, minimal shipping costs to get 'company fuel' in position.  Water was plentiful in the area.  N&W had very few 'long haul' routes thus running steam, district to district fit their operating plan.

ATSF operated through a lot of desert area and getting water in position for steam was a continuing costly problem.  ATSF was granted a large number of the original EMD FT diesels by the War Production Board and were able to realize the operating efficiencies from these locomotives during the war - after the war they moved with haste to fully realize the efficiencies of the diesels.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 399 posts
Posted by seppburgh2 on Friday, July 19, 2013 5:51 PM

Don't remember if this is from Trains or Classic Trains.  Thaw Wall Street view of the time was major RR running steam  mid to late 50's were living in the pre-historic era and treated the stock accordingly. The NW had a hard deadline due to stock swaps and the purchase of the Virginia to be out of steam business with a specific stock price.  Steam was going to be drag on the market price.  That my two cents and maybe a faulty memory.

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Friday, July 19, 2013 6:17 PM

No doubt having a stable of modern steam designed and constructed by the railroad contributed to late steam operations, SP during this period also commisioned a study on the diesel and concluded it had sufficient modern steam to postpone freight dieselization until the early sixties, the introduction of the F3 and later SD series rendered the issue moot.

Dave  

SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, July 20, 2013 11:51 AM

Balt, I have the impression that the N&W did not have to treat the water before using it in the boilers, but the AT&SF had great trouble, not only with finding water but with the alkali in what it did find.; am I right?

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, July 20, 2013 1:57 PM

I think two factors led the N&W to stay with steam for as long as it did.

1.The N&W had a fleet of modern steam locomotives.

2. And more importantly, since so much of their traffic was coal, the N&W was closely allied to (and dependent upon) the coal mining industry.

Mark

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,020 posts
Posted by BigJim on Sunday, July 21, 2013 5:54 AM

The N&W treated their water like everyone else.

.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:39 AM

A third factor was very modern and efficient steam locomotive servicing facilities.  And a fourth was very heads-up and efficient utilization of the modern steam power.  

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, August 29, 2013 4:38 PM

BTW both railroads dieselized, ATSF just started earlier and completed dieselization earlier. N&W wasn't a very large railroad, so once they decided to go diesel, they converted pretty quickly.

Stix
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, August 30, 2013 6:20 AM

Possibly too fast.   Saunders wanted to make a name for himself after less than steller results at PRR.  But maybe not.   At least they had the very good sence to standardize and not buy from everyone just to dieselize even faster.   They did dieselize intelligently.   First the connection to the PRR Harrisburg line to end the use of the old 4-8-0's, with modern power still on  main-line.   With that experience then proceeding to the main line.

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter