BigJim wrote:...Would avoid this continual confusion with Classic Toy Trains.wj, How many times has someone suggested this same thing or asked for some kind of change? One wonders if Kalmbach actually cares?
...Would avoid this continual confusion with Classic Toy Trains.
True, I suspect it's too late now however - enough people read Classic Trains and they would be afraid of losing some casual (non-subscriber) readers who buy at the LHS or magazine store. Still, would be nice if they had figured out at the time that the name was too close to their already-in-existence Classic Toy Trains.
On an unrelated sidenote: You'd think a name wouldn't matter that much, but it's funny how much it can. In the fifties one of the U.S.'s top orchestras was the Minneapolis Symphony Orchestra, in the sixties when they changed their name to the Minnesota Symphony Orchestra their status dropped, they quit being invited to international music festivals, their recordings suffered etc. Not sure even now they're quite back to where they had been. People had a hard time accepting this was the same musicians under a different name.
.
I always wish Kalmbach had picked up the "Vintage Rails" magazine title when Pentrex quit publishing it (IIRC subscribers to VR had their subscription transferred over to Classic Trains). Would avoid this continual confusion with Classic Toy Trains.
You're Welcome, it's a VERY common mistake. Good Luck and enjoy your new treasure.
Doug
May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter