ATLANTIC CENTRAL Euclid Well the latest news is that Trump is looking for a way to sue China for the damages caused by their coronavirus. Free model trains and half price on everything at Walmart for the next 50 years...... Sounds good to me.
Euclid Well the latest news is that Trump is looking for a way to sue China for the damages caused by their coronavirus.
Well the latest news is that Trump is looking for a way to sue China for the damages caused by their coronavirus.
Free model trains and half price on everything at Walmart for the next 50 years......
Sounds good to me.
Yeah, but remember the old saying, "You get what you pay for!"
Covid-19 Immunity ????
https://time.com/5810454/coronavirus-immunity-reinfection/
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
So it wasn't so much a re-infection as it was a rush to judgement that the original cure was complete?
Flintlock76 ATLANTIC CENTRAL Euclid Well the latest news is that Trump is looking for a way to sue China for the damages caused by their coronavirus. Free model trains and half price on everything at Walmart for the next 50 years...... Sounds good to me. Yeah, but remember the old saying, "You get what you pay for!"
Agreed, sarcasm is hard to put into print........
Sheldon
[/quote]
243129 daveklepper I will cease posting Israel's progress in controling the virus unless someone requests me to do so. Who "requested"?
daveklepper I will cease posting Israel's progress in controling the virus unless someone requests me to do so.
Who "requested"?
The people who did read my posts on other threads who obviously realize the request not to post anything was meant in jest.
Should you wish to carry this or any other personal argument further:
daveklepper@yahoo.com
But not on this website!
FYI, there are more than the three folks who have asked you to stop publicly who would prefer that you stop these long, marginally-related to the thread posts.
Perhaps you could post them on the "Some Israeli News" thread you started?
Maybe you would benefit from reading sites like Bend the Arc, the Jewish Voice for Peace, Never Again Action, J Street or The World Union for Progressive Judaism.
You style yourself as a conservative. AFAIK, many conservatives here strongly oppose the use of eminent domain to take property and evict the owner and use it for other uses. Yet you support a government where you reside that repeatedly has done that to Palestinians in East Jerusalem, long the Israeli version of The Wall and various other locations. These actions often include the use of bulldozers to destroy their homes and olive orchards.
daveklepperThe people who did read my posts on other threads who obviously realize the request not to post anything was meant in jest.
Why can't you be a "cool guy" like me, and do what I did with the "Sweden's Curve" post?
Copy a relevant paragraph or two that supports your position, and then provide a link to the rest of the story for those who remain interested to continue reading.
You're treating this place like it is your personal blog. Other relevant posts are being overshadowed by the din of your "contributions"
And no, when I requested that you turn off the Pro-Israel propaganda channel, I wasn't jesting.
I was not responding to you. I was responfing to McFarlane
I will not respond to your inaccurate accusation of pro-Israel Propaganda here.
If you wish to discuss my defense of my right to live where I am without the problem of terror you may contact me at daveklepper@yahoo.com. I will not reply further here.
Those who wish me well and have fhe kind of medical knowledge that helped withi the cured vs. recovered issue can help with another problem.
When an institution, be it a hospital, country, whatever. announces both that they have a 100% reovery rate from the Cononavirus and at the same time announce a number of deaths, one is of course cuious az just what they are talking about. The answer, of course, is that all those who died had pre-existing medical problens. So the death was not brought on by the Cononavirus alone.
But don't most people have some illness in their history? What are the criteria for attributing a death to pre-existing medical problems?
In comparing various treatments, what is the criterion for this factor. It should be applied universaly. Is it?
I'm glad to report that limited light rail service and bus service, removed Wednesday evening, will be restored to Jerusalem Sunday morning.
As a general comment, I read the website of organizations with whom I disagree with, and on occasion have posted information received from them as information. This applies to all areas of life that are important to me. And I do not make the mistake of answering a poster without reading all that he or she has written.
If anyone has information from a website, information that I may have overlooked (even in my inspection of the website) contradicting something that I believe to be fact, please do contact me at daveklepper@yahoo.com witih both my statement and what you consider a fact from a website. Thanks
Two posts later you are expounding on Israel.
daveklepperDefense Ministry uses Israeli start-up to streamline coronavirus fight 'We hope that by conducting due diligence on the credibility of suppliers, and speeding up the supply chain, hospitals will be better prepared to cope with the coronavirus' By JERUSALEM POST STAFF APRIL 10, 2020 09:40
Two posts after the one above you again expound ad nauseam re Israel.
daveklepperIsrael's Health Ministry signed an agreement with the Weizmann Institute of Science on Friday to use its advanced laboratories to perform coronavirus tests. According to the ministry, testing will start immediately and screen about 1,000 people per day.The news comes as the number of coronavirus patients in Israel surged past 10,000 on Friday morning leaving 93 people dead and the government lifted some of the restrictions on most of the country.
My question is who requested that info? I saw no request between "I will cease posting Israel's progress in controling the virus unless someone requests me to do so." and"Israel's Health Ministry signed an agreement".
After due deliberation, I decided that Flintlock and of course the Moderator due have the power to ask me not to post long but fact-filled posts instead of just URLS or URLS and a short paragraph. I think a najority of readers still would rather have the information on the thread and not have pull up other websites. We had the same argument on the L-Sandy-Recovery thread on the Tranit Forum.
Dave - I don't need to see entire articles posted in the TRAIN'S forum. A summary and a link will do.
I still want to hear from Flintlock on this question, since this is his thread.
When I get a summary and a URL on a topic that interests me, half the time I get:
Page cannot be displayed
You have used up your three free articles, please subscribe on-line
Page timed out
No such address
If Flintlock asks me to conform to your wish I will do so.
You probably have an excellent server and your own state-of-the-art computer. I do not. Do all other readers? And just how could I possibly summarize the preceding posting of mine without omitting information? Just state that Israel is testing verious treatments? Don't readers wish to know which treatments, from where, and how are they tested?
I assture you that this tijme and for the future, I did erase political stuff and photos.
daveklepperI still want to hear from Flintlock on this question, since this is his thread. When I get a summary and a URL on a topic that interests me, half the time I get: Page cannot be displayed You have used up your three free articles, please subscribe on-line Page timed out No such address If Flintlock asks me to conform to your wish I will do so. You probably have an excellent server and your own state-of-the-art computer. I do not. Do all other readers? And just how could I possibly summarize the preceding posting of mine without omitting information? Just state that Israel is testing verious treatments? Don't readers wish to know which treatments, from where, and how are they tested? I assture you that this tijme and for the future, I did erase political stuff and photos.
Without posting just a summary and a link - I can just about assure you, nobody is wadeing through the length of the posts. If 'you' can't develop a sentance or two summary about the article, I have my doubts that you waded through it either.
The link gives the readers the opportunity to pursue the info - If they want to.
That isn't true. For one thing, I must look for material that violates the guidelines.
But I will try to do better to strike out anything not essential to the information that is important, as follows
243129daveklepper I will cease posting Israel's progress in controling the virus unless someone requests me to do so.
Mr. Klepper:
What part of this am I not getting?
In the earlier posting, I did think about deleting the Obama statement for both possibly being political and also not really necessary for the main message. Buit since I've been wrongly accused of being a right-wing conservative, I though I'd better leave it in or removing it might be thought of as proving the lie qs a truth.
And answering Jim Wrinn's blog:
Jim:
Not Amtrak but Metro North and the State of New York --- One Boss. Cuomo
Vanderbilt Avenue reserved fir the purpose
Street Level High Platforms at GCT Riverdale also a boarding point
Commuter-car doors wide enough to ma Add Quote to your Post neuver stretchers
Hospitals available Tarrytown, Ossining, Peelskill, Beacon. Poughkeepsie, Hudson. Albany and on to Buffalo
Can you give Cuomo a call eight now?
David K: I'm sure an MIT grad learned how to succinctly summarize an article. These days most accomplish this with bullet points or numbers for the main points, followed by a phrase. Of course that requires the poster to read the article using critical thinking.
Alternatively you could cut and past the introductory paragraph of the article, which, if well-written, would be a summary.
Dave,
I read the first part of the article you posted. You had chosen to omit that first part when you quoted the article. I find that omitted content to be quite interesting and do not see a problem if you do choose to post it. The following are my thoughts about that first part of the link:
The first part of the article proposes a suggestion for addressing and solving the virus problem by the use of universal testing and contact tracing, apparently on continuing basis of monitoring everyone in the country.
This suggested solution has not been implemented or tried by those suggesting it, but they imply that the current Administration is negligent for not implementing it. Yet there is no indication that the Administration has ruled it out. That implication in the article is that the Administration is not doing the right thing and is doing the wrong thing by wanting to restart the economy.
But the suggestion of widespread testing and contact tracing does not preclude the option of restarting the economy. They are not mutually exclusive as the article implies. Certainly we cannot move ahead and complete the system for national testing and contact tracing prior to restarting the economy. That would leave the economy shut down for years while massive work of developing the new system of testing and tracing is implemented. I would like to see the price tag for the suggested new system of testing/tracing. It may be that our economy is simply incapable of servicing the debt on the funding needed for such a revolutionary and comprehensive federal system.
The link to the article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/04/10/contact-tracing-coronavirus-strategy/
daveklepper Part of what? McFarlane posted that I should cease immediately posting because nobody was reading anything I wrote anyway, and I redponded with the quote you used. I then realized he was pulling my leg, and that was proved by the immediate response of several viewers to a posting on another thread. I explained this already in a previous posting, but some posters keep quoting this response. Part of what? The posting for which I gave a URL? The first half.
Now I have to reply, was I posting in the other thread in which you refer to? Possibly not, but when I do post in a thread I'm specifically talking in that thread and that thread only. If I have to be specific and state I'm surprised you're still posting in the COVID-19 thread because I doubt anyone is reading your posts anymore I will, but I was not pulling your leg. This is my last post in this thread because I'm completely sick of COVID-19 news. I no longer care about it, it's just wasting my time...I've already been put on a rotating schedule because no one can/wants to travel. Sweden has it right, even with all the deaths the only reason their economy will falter is because oft he remainder of the world shutting down.
BaltACDcan just about assure you, nobody is wadeing through the length of the posts. If 'you' can't develop a sentance or two summary about the article, I have my doubts that you waded through it either.
I've wondered the same thing. In one of his marathon posts last week, the same subject was reported three times, just with slightly different wording, making me wonder if he had copied and pasted from three separate sources into one post. Without bothering to proof his own post.
On top of all that If I had 6+ different people here all asking me "don't do that anymore" I don't think I would feel justified blaming them for being the ones who were argumentative
daveklepper I still want to hear from Flintlock on this question, since this is his thread. When I get a summary and a URL on a topic that interests me, half the time I get: Page cannot be displayed You have used up your three free articles, please subscribe on-line
When I get a summary and a URL on a topic that interests me, half the time I get: Page cannot be displayed You have used up your three free articles, please subscribe on-line
So you are copying stories from behind a paywall, and pasting them here?
Coincidently enough, we already have Flintlocks position on the reposting of copied, longwinded dissertations right here:
http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/740/t/281586.aspx?page=1
Scroll down to his reply to me on the very subject.
Convicted OneSo you are copying stories from behind a paywall, and pasting them here?
I think what he is saying is that he doesn't like reading someone's post with just a link to an article, and then trying to access the link, can't get the article. I think he wants to avoid that.
I believe we can give a very learned and intelligent man a pass here on his posts. If someone doesn't want to read through them, they can just click past them.
York1 John
York1I think he wants to avoid that.
If they are copied from another published source, I'd er on the side of caution and suspect it was protected material. Which you can get away with extracting small relevant chunks from under the "fair use" doctrine, and then providing a link to the full protected article. Which is all we are trying to get him to do.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.