Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
NS Consortium Bilevels
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="CMStPnP"]It would be interesting to find out exactly what they did to make the design fail the test. Though I don't think we will ever know. Europeans and Japanese both have a far different design philiosophy than we do when it comes to passenger carrying equipment[/quote]</p> <p>It disturbes me much more that N-S tried for over a year to find a correction to the problem.</p> <p>I don't think it has to do with the different design philosophy regarding passenger rail equipment. N-S is used to handle design of CEM element for a long time. And they know stiffness requirements too. The difference is they are lower in Japan than the USA.</p> <p>Sometimes you can run into problems if the owner defines too many design limits.</p> <p>As Siemens stated they were not able to keep the PRIIA weight limit for the Brightline car and question if it is possible for the single-level PRIIA cars.</p> <p>The difference of just 2,000 lbs as posted above between a Siemens European car and the PRIIA single-level coach weight limit seems too low. In the past it was between 10,000 and 20,000 lbs.</p> <p>Perhaps similar happened with the bi-level cars.<br />Regards, Volker</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy