Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Should Amtrak venture into high priority freight?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="zugmann"]</p> <p>From what I recall, the freight railroads weren't too pleased with giving priorty routing to those 40-car long Amtrak "passenger" trains that were comprised of 38 freight cars. [/quote]</p> <p>I remember riding the Three Rivers from Chicago to Pittsburgh. The time I rode it the train had two coaches, a cafe/lounge car and a sleeper. Although I don't remember how many head-end cars it had, it seemed like there were 15 to 20 of them. </p> <p>Successful commercial enterprises know their core mission (business purpose) and competencies. They keep their focus on them. Many failed businesses lose sight of their mission and their core competencies. Frequently they spread themselves too thin.</p> <p>Outside of the NEC, as well as several corridors, Amtrak has not been a successful commercial enterprise. It has lost more than $30 billion, before adjustment for inflation, since its birth. A major reason is because it has been forced for political reasons to focus its energies too broadly. Getting into any kind of package or freight service would dissipate its focus even more than is the case now. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy