Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Supremes to Hear Amtrak Timekeeping
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="oltmannd"]</p> <p>[quote user="Sam1"]Ah, but is that railroad compensated fully - fully allocated costs - for hoisting Amtrak's trains and giving them priority?[/quote]</p> <p>No, but it's irrelevant to the deal they have with Amtrak to host the train.[/quote]</p> <p>Every contract, no matter how well it is written, contains ambiguities. If I am being compensated fully for the service that I am providing you, I am going to bias my interpretation of the ambiguities for our mutual benefit. If I am not being compensated fairly, I am going to call them in my favor. And many times, given the psychology, I won't even know that I am doing it.</p> <p>Come to think about it, I like the idea of slowing the long distance trains to 59 mph. Outside of a few die hard riders, few people take them seriously. If it would improve the time keeping, as per the Railway Age article, most of the people that I have seen on the long distance trains, including the guy I see in the mirror, would not care. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy