Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Amtrak 2013 Operating Results
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="dakotafred"]</p> <p>Yawn.</p> <p>If these LD trains were running around empty, I'd agree to ax 'em. The LD trains I have ridden -- mainly in the fall, which is to say in the off season -- have been well patronized. Given that -- and that, to my mind, passenger trains are so intimately connected with our national development and even identity -- I could care less about the cost/benefit per mile or their paltry half-billion (out of a 3-plus trillion budget) contribution to our spending.</p> <p>I wish you green-eyeshade types would be more zealous in getting after "waste" in other areas. But you Obama voters approve of much of that -- which makes your moral position no better than mine. [/quote]</p> <p>The average load factor for the long distance trains in FY13 was 62.9 per cent. The average load factor for the Empire Builder, which I presume is the train that you ride most frequently, which assumes further that you live in one of the Dakotas, was 60 per cent.</p> <p>The problem for the long distance trains, as noted, is not the load factor. It is that Amtrak cannot charge enough to generate sufficient revenues to cover the cost of the long distance trains.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy